Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? the MFMU Network APEX study

William A. Grobman, Jennifer L. Bailit, Madeline Murguia Rice, Ronald J. Wapner, Michael W. Varner, John M. Thorp, Kenneth J. Leveno, Steve N. Caritis, Jay D. Iams, Alan T. Tita, George Saade, Yoram Sorokin, Dwight J. Rouse, Jorge E. Tolosa, J. Peter Van Dorsten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes are related to differences in care. Study Design The Assessment of Perinatal EXcellence cohort comprises 115,502 women and their neonates who were born in 25 hospitals in the United States between March 2008 and February 2011. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to quantify the amount of variation in postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, severe perineal laceration, and a composite adverse neonatal outcome among hospitals that is explained by differences in patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and obstetric care provided. Results The study included 115,502 women. For most outcomes, 20-40% of hospital differences in outcomes were related to differences in patient populations. After adjusting for patient-, provider-, and hospital-level factors, multiple care processes were associated with the predefined adverse outcomes; however, these care processes did not explain significant variation in the frequency of adverse outcomes among hospitals. Ultimately, 50-100% of the interhospital variation in outcomes was unexplained. Conclusion Hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes could not be explained by differences in frequency of types of care provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume211
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Obstetrics
Peripartum Period
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Lacerations
Logistic Models
Newborn Infant
Infection
Population

Keywords

  • obstetrics
  • quality care
  • quality measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? the MFMU Network APEX study. / Grobman, William A.; Bailit, Jennifer L.; Rice, Madeline Murguia; Wapner, Ronald J.; Varner, Michael W.; Thorp, John M.; Leveno, Kenneth J.; Caritis, Steve N.; Iams, Jay D.; Tita, Alan T.; Saade, George; Sorokin, Yoram; Rouse, Dwight J.; Tolosa, Jorge E.; Van Dorsten, J. Peter.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 211, No. 2, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grobman, WA, Bailit, JL, Rice, MM, Wapner, RJ, Varner, MW, Thorp, JM, Leveno, KJ, Caritis, SN, Iams, JD, Tita, AT, Saade, G, Sorokin, Y, Rouse, DJ, Tolosa, JE & Van Dorsten, JP 2014, 'Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? the MFMU Network APEX study', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 211, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.017
Grobman, William A. ; Bailit, Jennifer L. ; Rice, Madeline Murguia ; Wapner, Ronald J. ; Varner, Michael W. ; Thorp, John M. ; Leveno, Kenneth J. ; Caritis, Steve N. ; Iams, Jay D. ; Tita, Alan T. ; Saade, George ; Sorokin, Yoram ; Rouse, Dwight J. ; Tolosa, Jorge E. ; Van Dorsten, J. Peter. / Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? the MFMU Network APEX study. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014 ; Vol. 211, No. 2.
@article{84e7d9e37fe04341bdcd6b271b9c0529,
title = "Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? the MFMU Network APEX study",
abstract = "Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes are related to differences in care. Study Design The Assessment of Perinatal EXcellence cohort comprises 115,502 women and their neonates who were born in 25 hospitals in the United States between March 2008 and February 2011. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to quantify the amount of variation in postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, severe perineal laceration, and a composite adverse neonatal outcome among hospitals that is explained by differences in patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and obstetric care provided. Results The study included 115,502 women. For most outcomes, 20-40{\%} of hospital differences in outcomes were related to differences in patient populations. After adjusting for patient-, provider-, and hospital-level factors, multiple care processes were associated with the predefined adverse outcomes; however, these care processes did not explain significant variation in the frequency of adverse outcomes among hospitals. Ultimately, 50-100{\%} of the interhospital variation in outcomes was unexplained. Conclusion Hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes could not be explained by differences in frequency of types of care provided.",
keywords = "obstetrics, quality care, quality measures",
author = "Grobman, {William A.} and Bailit, {Jennifer L.} and Rice, {Madeline Murguia} and Wapner, {Ronald J.} and Varner, {Michael W.} and Thorp, {John M.} and Leveno, {Kenneth J.} and Caritis, {Steve N.} and Iams, {Jay D.} and Tita, {Alan T.} and George Saade and Yoram Sorokin and Rouse, {Dwight J.} and Tolosa, {Jorge E.} and {Van Dorsten}, {J. Peter}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? the MFMU Network APEX study

AU - Grobman, William A.

AU - Bailit, Jennifer L.

AU - Rice, Madeline Murguia

AU - Wapner, Ronald J.

AU - Varner, Michael W.

AU - Thorp, John M.

AU - Leveno, Kenneth J.

AU - Caritis, Steve N.

AU - Iams, Jay D.

AU - Tita, Alan T.

AU - Saade, George

AU - Sorokin, Yoram

AU - Rouse, Dwight J.

AU - Tolosa, Jorge E.

AU - Van Dorsten, J. Peter

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes are related to differences in care. Study Design The Assessment of Perinatal EXcellence cohort comprises 115,502 women and their neonates who were born in 25 hospitals in the United States between March 2008 and February 2011. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to quantify the amount of variation in postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, severe perineal laceration, and a composite adverse neonatal outcome among hospitals that is explained by differences in patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and obstetric care provided. Results The study included 115,502 women. For most outcomes, 20-40% of hospital differences in outcomes were related to differences in patient populations. After adjusting for patient-, provider-, and hospital-level factors, multiple care processes were associated with the predefined adverse outcomes; however, these care processes did not explain significant variation in the frequency of adverse outcomes among hospitals. Ultimately, 50-100% of the interhospital variation in outcomes was unexplained. Conclusion Hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes could not be explained by differences in frequency of types of care provided.

AB - Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes are related to differences in care. Study Design The Assessment of Perinatal EXcellence cohort comprises 115,502 women and their neonates who were born in 25 hospitals in the United States between March 2008 and February 2011. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to quantify the amount of variation in postpartum hemorrhage, peripartum infection, severe perineal laceration, and a composite adverse neonatal outcome among hospitals that is explained by differences in patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and obstetric care provided. Results The study included 115,502 women. For most outcomes, 20-40% of hospital differences in outcomes were related to differences in patient populations. After adjusting for patient-, provider-, and hospital-level factors, multiple care processes were associated with the predefined adverse outcomes; however, these care processes did not explain significant variation in the frequency of adverse outcomes among hospitals. Ultimately, 50-100% of the interhospital variation in outcomes was unexplained. Conclusion Hospital differences in the frequency of adverse obstetric outcomes could not be explained by differences in frequency of types of care provided.

KW - obstetrics

KW - quality care

KW - quality measures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905108646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905108646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.017

M3 - Article

VL - 211

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 2

ER -