Can patient reported outcomes help identify the optimal outcome in palliative surgery?

Brian Badgwell, Eduardo Bruera, Vicki Klimberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an open-ended questionnaire captures severe symptoms in cancer patients undergoing palliative surgical consultation that a structured, validated quality-of-life assessment does not capture. Methods We prospectively used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and an open-ended questionnaire to assess the symptoms of patients with incurable malignancies who underwent palliative surgical consultation at our institution between January 2011 and September 2012. Results Of the 69 patients enrolled, the most common indications for consultation were bowel obstruction (54%), jaundice (13%), wound problems (10%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (7%). Of the severe symptoms patients reported, 76% were identified with the FACT-G alone, 22% were identified with the open-ended questionnaire alone, and 2% were duplicate responses captured with both the FACT-G and open-ended questionnaire. The open-ended questionnaire captured 68 instances of severe symptoms in 47 patients that the FACT-G did not capture; of these symptoms, 52 were considered to be highly relevant to surgery and potential outcome measures. Conclusions An open-ended questionnaire can identify severe symptoms that a global quality of life survey cannot capture and could be used in conjunction with a global survey to reassess symptoms after palliative surgical consultation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:145-150.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-150
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Oncology
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Palliative Care
Referral and Consultation
Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Therapeutics
Jaundice
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Hemorrhage
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • advanced cancer
  • palliative surgery
  • patient reported outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Can patient reported outcomes help identify the optimal outcome in palliative surgery? / Badgwell, Brian; Bruera, Eduardo; Klimberg, Vicki.

In: Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 109, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 145-150.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{21322c4d76644169a3f03a3e74814beb,
title = "Can patient reported outcomes help identify the optimal outcome in palliative surgery?",
abstract = "Background The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an open-ended questionnaire captures severe symptoms in cancer patients undergoing palliative surgical consultation that a structured, validated quality-of-life assessment does not capture. Methods We prospectively used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and an open-ended questionnaire to assess the symptoms of patients with incurable malignancies who underwent palliative surgical consultation at our institution between January 2011 and September 2012. Results Of the 69 patients enrolled, the most common indications for consultation were bowel obstruction (54{\%}), jaundice (13{\%}), wound problems (10{\%}), and gastrointestinal bleeding (7{\%}). Of the severe symptoms patients reported, 76{\%} were identified with the FACT-G alone, 22{\%} were identified with the open-ended questionnaire alone, and 2{\%} were duplicate responses captured with both the FACT-G and open-ended questionnaire. The open-ended questionnaire captured 68 instances of severe symptoms in 47 patients that the FACT-G did not capture; of these symptoms, 52 were considered to be highly relevant to surgery and potential outcome measures. Conclusions An open-ended questionnaire can identify severe symptoms that a global quality of life survey cannot capture and could be used in conjunction with a global survey to reassess symptoms after palliative surgical consultation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:145-150.",
keywords = "advanced cancer, palliative surgery, patient reported outcomes",
author = "Brian Badgwell and Eduardo Bruera and Vicki Klimberg",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/jso.23466",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "145--150",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0022-4790",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can patient reported outcomes help identify the optimal outcome in palliative surgery?

AU - Badgwell, Brian

AU - Bruera, Eduardo

AU - Klimberg, Vicki

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Background The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an open-ended questionnaire captures severe symptoms in cancer patients undergoing palliative surgical consultation that a structured, validated quality-of-life assessment does not capture. Methods We prospectively used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and an open-ended questionnaire to assess the symptoms of patients with incurable malignancies who underwent palliative surgical consultation at our institution between January 2011 and September 2012. Results Of the 69 patients enrolled, the most common indications for consultation were bowel obstruction (54%), jaundice (13%), wound problems (10%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (7%). Of the severe symptoms patients reported, 76% were identified with the FACT-G alone, 22% were identified with the open-ended questionnaire alone, and 2% were duplicate responses captured with both the FACT-G and open-ended questionnaire. The open-ended questionnaire captured 68 instances of severe symptoms in 47 patients that the FACT-G did not capture; of these symptoms, 52 were considered to be highly relevant to surgery and potential outcome measures. Conclusions An open-ended questionnaire can identify severe symptoms that a global quality of life survey cannot capture and could be used in conjunction with a global survey to reassess symptoms after palliative surgical consultation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:145-150.

AB - Background The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether an open-ended questionnaire captures severe symptoms in cancer patients undergoing palliative surgical consultation that a structured, validated quality-of-life assessment does not capture. Methods We prospectively used the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) and an open-ended questionnaire to assess the symptoms of patients with incurable malignancies who underwent palliative surgical consultation at our institution between January 2011 and September 2012. Results Of the 69 patients enrolled, the most common indications for consultation were bowel obstruction (54%), jaundice (13%), wound problems (10%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (7%). Of the severe symptoms patients reported, 76% were identified with the FACT-G alone, 22% were identified with the open-ended questionnaire alone, and 2% were duplicate responses captured with both the FACT-G and open-ended questionnaire. The open-ended questionnaire captured 68 instances of severe symptoms in 47 patients that the FACT-G did not capture; of these symptoms, 52 were considered to be highly relevant to surgery and potential outcome measures. Conclusions An open-ended questionnaire can identify severe symptoms that a global quality of life survey cannot capture and could be used in conjunction with a global survey to reassess symptoms after palliative surgical consultation. J. Surg. Oncol. 2014 109:145-150.

KW - advanced cancer

KW - palliative surgery

KW - patient reported outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892922377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892922377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jso.23466

DO - 10.1002/jso.23466

M3 - Article

C2 - 24132785

AN - SCOPUS:84892922377

VL - 109

SP - 145

EP - 150

JO - Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0022-4790

IS - 2

ER -