Can small institutes address some problems facing biomedical researchers?

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

At a time of historically low National Institutes of Health funding rates and many problems with the conduct of research (unfunded mandates, disgruntled reviewers, and rampant paranoia), there is a concern that biomedical research as a profession is waning in the United States (see "Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws" by Alberts and colleagues in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). However, it is wonderful to discover something new and to tackle tough puzzles. If we could focus more of our effort on discussing scientific problems and doing research, then we could be more productive and perhaps happier. One potential solution is to focus efforts on small thematic institutes in the university structure that can provide a stimulating and supportive environment for innovation and exploration. With an open-lab concept, there are economies of scale that can diminish paperwork and costs, while providing greater access to state-of-the-art equipment. Merging multiple disciplines around a common theme can catalyze innovation, and this enables individuals to develop new concepts without giving up the credit they deserve, because it is usually clear who did the work. Small institutes do not solve larger systemic problems but rather enable collective efforts to address the noisome aspects of the system and foster an innovative community effort to address scientific problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3267-3269
Number of pages3
JournalMolecular Biology of the Cell
Volume25
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biomedical Research
Research Personnel
Paranoid Disorders
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research
Costs and Cost Analysis
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Can small institutes address some problems facing biomedical researchers? / Sheetz, Michael.

In: Molecular Biology of the Cell, Vol. 25, No. 21, 01.11.2014, p. 3267-3269.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

@article{c5203fd19c7f4176a67d6cd71ac2cd3f,
title = "Can small institutes address some problems facing biomedical researchers?",
abstract = "At a time of historically low National Institutes of Health funding rates and many problems with the conduct of research (unfunded mandates, disgruntled reviewers, and rampant paranoia), there is a concern that biomedical research as a profession is waning in the United States (see {"}Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws{"} by Alberts and colleagues in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). However, it is wonderful to discover something new and to tackle tough puzzles. If we could focus more of our effort on discussing scientific problems and doing research, then we could be more productive and perhaps happier. One potential solution is to focus efforts on small thematic institutes in the university structure that can provide a stimulating and supportive environment for innovation and exploration. With an open-lab concept, there are economies of scale that can diminish paperwork and costs, while providing greater access to state-of-the-art equipment. Merging multiple disciplines around a common theme can catalyze innovation, and this enables individuals to develop new concepts without giving up the credit they deserve, because it is usually clear who did the work. Small institutes do not solve larger systemic problems but rather enable collective efforts to address the noisome aspects of the system and foster an innovative community effort to address scientific problems.",
author = "Michael Sheetz",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1091/mbc.E14-05-1017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "3267--3269",
journal = "Molecular Biology of the Cell",
issn = "1059-1524",
publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
number = "21",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can small institutes address some problems facing biomedical researchers?

AU - Sheetz, Michael

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - At a time of historically low National Institutes of Health funding rates and many problems with the conduct of research (unfunded mandates, disgruntled reviewers, and rampant paranoia), there is a concern that biomedical research as a profession is waning in the United States (see "Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws" by Alberts and colleagues in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). However, it is wonderful to discover something new and to tackle tough puzzles. If we could focus more of our effort on discussing scientific problems and doing research, then we could be more productive and perhaps happier. One potential solution is to focus efforts on small thematic institutes in the university structure that can provide a stimulating and supportive environment for innovation and exploration. With an open-lab concept, there are economies of scale that can diminish paperwork and costs, while providing greater access to state-of-the-art equipment. Merging multiple disciplines around a common theme can catalyze innovation, and this enables individuals to develop new concepts without giving up the credit they deserve, because it is usually clear who did the work. Small institutes do not solve larger systemic problems but rather enable collective efforts to address the noisome aspects of the system and foster an innovative community effort to address scientific problems.

AB - At a time of historically low National Institutes of Health funding rates and many problems with the conduct of research (unfunded mandates, disgruntled reviewers, and rampant paranoia), there is a concern that biomedical research as a profession is waning in the United States (see "Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws" by Alberts and colleagues in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). However, it is wonderful to discover something new and to tackle tough puzzles. If we could focus more of our effort on discussing scientific problems and doing research, then we could be more productive and perhaps happier. One potential solution is to focus efforts on small thematic institutes in the university structure that can provide a stimulating and supportive environment for innovation and exploration. With an open-lab concept, there are economies of scale that can diminish paperwork and costs, while providing greater access to state-of-the-art equipment. Merging multiple disciplines around a common theme can catalyze innovation, and this enables individuals to develop new concepts without giving up the credit they deserve, because it is usually clear who did the work. Small institutes do not solve larger systemic problems but rather enable collective efforts to address the noisome aspects of the system and foster an innovative community effort to address scientific problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908638722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908638722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1091/mbc.E14-05-1017

DO - 10.1091/mbc.E14-05-1017

M3 - Short survey

VL - 25

SP - 3267

EP - 3269

JO - Molecular Biology of the Cell

JF - Molecular Biology of the Cell

SN - 1059-1524

IS - 21

ER -