TY - JOUR
T1 - Cardiopulmonary effects of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
AU - Katz, Brian R.
AU - Menson, Katherine E.
AU - Medina, Norman
AU - O'Connor, Shannon D.
AU - Kaminsky, David A.
AU - Irvin, Charles G.
AU - Coleman, Sulamunn R.M.
AU - DeSarno, Michael J.
AU - Higgins, Stephen T.
AU - Gaalema, Diann E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Psychological Association
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - E-cigarettes have been proposed as a harm-reduction strategy to reduce combustible cigarette use. Comparing the cardiopulmonary effects of vaping to smoking is necessary before recommending their use, especially for people at high risk from continued smoking, like those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Differences in the cardiopulmonary effects of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes for people with COPD who smoke were examined. Twenty-one individuals ≥40 years old diagnosed with COPD who smoked (≥5 cigarettes/day for ≥1 year) underwent two consecutive randomly ordered 2-week phases: a cigarette phase (usual-brand cigarettes) and a nicotine-containing e-cigarette phase (combustible cigarette abstinence with 3% and/or 5% nicotine tobacco-flavored JUUL available). Participants earned monetary incentives during the e-cigarette phase for cigarette abstinence, which was biochemically verified with daily carbon monoxide breath testing conducted remotely via phone (readings ≤6 parts per million). Pulmonary (spirometry, oscillometry, COPD Assessment Test, Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD) and cardiac (heart rate, blood pressure) measures were completed at baseline, daily (remotely) throughout phases (spirometry, heart rate, and blood pressure only), and after each phase. Changes across assessments were analyzed using mixed-model repeated measures analyses of variance. Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance at 19 Hz significantly improved during the e-cigarette phase, with the latter restricted to those who substantially abstained from combustible cigarettes (≥10 negative breath carbon monoxide samples) during this phase. The lack of significant adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes following e-cigarette use is promising. However, evaluating longer durations of e-cigarette substitution is warranted to determine their safety as a replacement for combustible cigarettes in patients with COPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) E-cigarettes could be a harm-reduction strategy to reduce combustible cigarette smoking, but adverse consequences on cardiopulmonary health—especially in populations with established pulmonary disease—must be evaluated before recommending their use. No cardiopulmonary measures worsened after 2 weeks of exclusive e-cigarette use, compared to 2 weeks of exclusive cigarette use. Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance improved after e-cigarette use. E-cigarettes may be a safe alternative to combustible cigarettes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.
AB - E-cigarettes have been proposed as a harm-reduction strategy to reduce combustible cigarette use. Comparing the cardiopulmonary effects of vaping to smoking is necessary before recommending their use, especially for people at high risk from continued smoking, like those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Differences in the cardiopulmonary effects of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes for people with COPD who smoke were examined. Twenty-one individuals ≥40 years old diagnosed with COPD who smoked (≥5 cigarettes/day for ≥1 year) underwent two consecutive randomly ordered 2-week phases: a cigarette phase (usual-brand cigarettes) and a nicotine-containing e-cigarette phase (combustible cigarette abstinence with 3% and/or 5% nicotine tobacco-flavored JUUL available). Participants earned monetary incentives during the e-cigarette phase for cigarette abstinence, which was biochemically verified with daily carbon monoxide breath testing conducted remotely via phone (readings ≤6 parts per million). Pulmonary (spirometry, oscillometry, COPD Assessment Test, Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD) and cardiac (heart rate, blood pressure) measures were completed at baseline, daily (remotely) throughout phases (spirometry, heart rate, and blood pressure only), and after each phase. Changes across assessments were analyzed using mixed-model repeated measures analyses of variance. Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance at 19 Hz significantly improved during the e-cigarette phase, with the latter restricted to those who substantially abstained from combustible cigarettes (≥10 negative breath carbon monoxide samples) during this phase. The lack of significant adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes following e-cigarette use is promising. However, evaluating longer durations of e-cigarette substitution is warranted to determine their safety as a replacement for combustible cigarettes in patients with COPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) E-cigarettes could be a harm-reduction strategy to reduce combustible cigarette smoking, but adverse consequences on cardiopulmonary health—especially in populations with established pulmonary disease—must be evaluated before recommending their use. No cardiopulmonary measures worsened after 2 weeks of exclusive e-cigarette use, compared to 2 weeks of exclusive cigarette use. Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance improved after e-cigarette use. E-cigarettes may be a safe alternative to combustible cigarettes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.
KW - cardiopulmonary function
KW - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
KW - e-cigarettes
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026150182
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026150182#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1037/pha0000814
DO - 10.1037/pha0000814
M3 - Article
C2 - 41343367
AN - SCOPUS:105026150182
SN - 1064-1297
JO - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
JF - Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
ER -