Cardiopulmonary effects of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

  • Brian R. Katz
  • , Katherine E. Menson
  • , Norman Medina
  • , Shannon D. O'Connor
  • , David A. Kaminsky
  • , Charles G. Irvin
  • , Sulamunn R.M. Coleman
  • , Michael J. DeSarno
  • , Stephen T. Higgins
  • , Diann E. Gaalema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

E-cigarettes have been proposed as a harm-reduction strategy to reduce combustible cigarette use. Comparing the cardiopulmonary effects of vaping to smoking is necessary before recommending their use, especially for people at high risk from continued smoking, like those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Differences in the cardiopulmonary effects of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes for people with COPD who smoke were examined. Twenty-one individuals ≥40 years old diagnosed with COPD who smoked (≥5 cigarettes/day for ≥1 year) underwent two consecutive randomly ordered 2-week phases: a cigarette phase (usual-brand cigarettes) and a nicotine-containing e-cigarette phase (combustible cigarette abstinence with 3% and/or 5% nicotine tobacco-flavored JUUL available). Participants earned monetary incentives during the e-cigarette phase for cigarette abstinence, which was biochemically verified with daily carbon monoxide breath testing conducted remotely via phone (readings ≤6 parts per million). Pulmonary (spirometry, oscillometry, COPD Assessment Test, Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD) and cardiac (heart rate, blood pressure) measures were completed at baseline, daily (remotely) throughout phases (spirometry, heart rate, and blood pressure only), and after each phase. Changes across assessments were analyzed using mixed-model repeated measures analyses of variance. Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance at 19 Hz significantly improved during the e-cigarette phase, with the latter restricted to those who substantially abstained from combustible cigarettes (≥10 negative breath carbon monoxide samples) during this phase. The lack of significant adverse cardiopulmonary outcomes following e-cigarette use is promising. However, evaluating longer durations of e-cigarette substitution is warranted to determine their safety as a replacement for combustible cigarettes in patients with COPD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved) E-cigarettes could be a harm-reduction strategy to reduce combustible cigarette smoking, but adverse consequences on cardiopulmonary health—especially in populations with established pulmonary disease—must be evaluated before recommending their use. No cardiopulmonary measures worsened after 2 weeks of exclusive e-cigarette use, compared to 2 weeks of exclusive cigarette use. Diastolic blood pressure and airway resistance improved after e-cigarette use. E-cigarettes may be a safe alternative to combustible cigarettes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalExperimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • cardiopulmonary function
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • e-cigarettes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiopulmonary effects of combustible cigarettes and e-cigarettes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this