Caregiver acceptance of a patient navigation program to increase human papillomavirus vaccination in pediatric clinics

a qualitative program evaluation

Jacqueline Hirth, Abbey Berenson, Leslie E. Cofie, Lena Matsushita, Yong Fang Kuo, Richard Rupp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the acceptability of a multi-component patient navigator (PN) intervention program designed to decrease barriers to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among caregivers of adolescents. We sought to understand the most important components of the program from the caregivers’ perspective and to evaluate remaining barriers to vaccination. Method: Caregivers of children 9–17 years old (N = 102) participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews with questions informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. These interviews assessed experiences with a PN program which offered HPV vaccination, scheduling, and reminders in pediatric clinics. We included randomly selected 46 program participant transcripts and 11 decliner transcripts. A thematic approach was used to analyze transcripts for themes related to acceptability of HPV vaccination, important program components, and any problems encountered. Results: Major themes included: reasons for making HPV vaccination decision, helpful program components and suggestions for improvement, and remaining barriers to vaccination. Those who declined vaccination stated that their child was too young or not ready to think about sex, or they did not have enough information to make a decision. However, they felt that PNs were respectful of their decision. Program participants felt that vaccination was an important way to prevent cancer. Program participants had often not been aware of the vaccine and felt that having it explained was very helpful. Conclusion: This program evaluation found that caregivers of pediatric patients, even those who declined the HPV vaccine, appreciated the program and felt it provided important information about the vaccine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHuman Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Patient Navigation
Program Evaluation
Caregivers
Vaccination
Pediatrics
Vaccines
Interviews
Papillomavirus Vaccines

Keywords

  • cancer prevention
  • HPV vaccine acceptance
  • HPV vaccine decliners
  • patient navigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Pharmacology

Cite this

@article{1edd94afa1934b2fbfbecafa63ed87a6,
title = "Caregiver acceptance of a patient navigation program to increase human papillomavirus vaccination in pediatric clinics: a qualitative program evaluation",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the acceptability of a multi-component patient navigator (PN) intervention program designed to decrease barriers to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among caregivers of adolescents. We sought to understand the most important components of the program from the caregivers’ perspective and to evaluate remaining barriers to vaccination. Method: Caregivers of children 9–17 years old (N = 102) participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews with questions informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. These interviews assessed experiences with a PN program which offered HPV vaccination, scheduling, and reminders in pediatric clinics. We included randomly selected 46 program participant transcripts and 11 decliner transcripts. A thematic approach was used to analyze transcripts for themes related to acceptability of HPV vaccination, important program components, and any problems encountered. Results: Major themes included: reasons for making HPV vaccination decision, helpful program components and suggestions for improvement, and remaining barriers to vaccination. Those who declined vaccination stated that their child was too young or not ready to think about sex, or they did not have enough information to make a decision. However, they felt that PNs were respectful of their decision. Program participants felt that vaccination was an important way to prevent cancer. Program participants had often not been aware of the vaccine and felt that having it explained was very helpful. Conclusion: This program evaluation found that caregivers of pediatric patients, even those who declined the HPV vaccine, appreciated the program and felt it provided important information about the vaccine.",
keywords = "cancer prevention, HPV vaccine acceptance, HPV vaccine decliners, patient navigation",
author = "Jacqueline Hirth and Abbey Berenson and Cofie, {Leslie E.} and Lena Matsushita and Kuo, {Yong Fang} and Richard Rupp",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/21645515.2019.1587276",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics",
issn = "2164-5515",
publisher = "Landes Bioscience",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caregiver acceptance of a patient navigation program to increase human papillomavirus vaccination in pediatric clinics

T2 - a qualitative program evaluation

AU - Hirth, Jacqueline

AU - Berenson, Abbey

AU - Cofie, Leslie E.

AU - Matsushita, Lena

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

AU - Rupp, Richard

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the acceptability of a multi-component patient navigator (PN) intervention program designed to decrease barriers to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among caregivers of adolescents. We sought to understand the most important components of the program from the caregivers’ perspective and to evaluate remaining barriers to vaccination. Method: Caregivers of children 9–17 years old (N = 102) participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews with questions informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. These interviews assessed experiences with a PN program which offered HPV vaccination, scheduling, and reminders in pediatric clinics. We included randomly selected 46 program participant transcripts and 11 decliner transcripts. A thematic approach was used to analyze transcripts for themes related to acceptability of HPV vaccination, important program components, and any problems encountered. Results: Major themes included: reasons for making HPV vaccination decision, helpful program components and suggestions for improvement, and remaining barriers to vaccination. Those who declined vaccination stated that their child was too young or not ready to think about sex, or they did not have enough information to make a decision. However, they felt that PNs were respectful of their decision. Program participants felt that vaccination was an important way to prevent cancer. Program participants had often not been aware of the vaccine and felt that having it explained was very helpful. Conclusion: This program evaluation found that caregivers of pediatric patients, even those who declined the HPV vaccine, appreciated the program and felt it provided important information about the vaccine.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the acceptability of a multi-component patient navigator (PN) intervention program designed to decrease barriers to human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among caregivers of adolescents. We sought to understand the most important components of the program from the caregivers’ perspective and to evaluate remaining barriers to vaccination. Method: Caregivers of children 9–17 years old (N = 102) participated in qualitative semi-structured interviews with questions informed by the Theory of Planned Behavior. These interviews assessed experiences with a PN program which offered HPV vaccination, scheduling, and reminders in pediatric clinics. We included randomly selected 46 program participant transcripts and 11 decliner transcripts. A thematic approach was used to analyze transcripts for themes related to acceptability of HPV vaccination, important program components, and any problems encountered. Results: Major themes included: reasons for making HPV vaccination decision, helpful program components and suggestions for improvement, and remaining barriers to vaccination. Those who declined vaccination stated that their child was too young or not ready to think about sex, or they did not have enough information to make a decision. However, they felt that PNs were respectful of their decision. Program participants felt that vaccination was an important way to prevent cancer. Program participants had often not been aware of the vaccine and felt that having it explained was very helpful. Conclusion: This program evaluation found that caregivers of pediatric patients, even those who declined the HPV vaccine, appreciated the program and felt it provided important information about the vaccine.

KW - cancer prevention

KW - HPV vaccine acceptance

KW - HPV vaccine decliners

KW - patient navigation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063893170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063893170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21645515.2019.1587276

DO - 10.1080/21645515.2019.1587276

M3 - Article

JO - Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics

JF - Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics

SN - 2164-5515

ER -