Caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device implantation

Michael Koeckert, Patrick Vining, Alex Reyentovich, Stuart D. Katz, Abelardo DeAnda, Stefanie Philipson, Leora B. Balsam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To determine the relationship between caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Background The absence of a caregiver is a relative contraindication to durable LVAD support. Methods Forty-three patients that underwent primary LVAD implantation were divided into three groups: those with caregivers that retained their roles for the duration of LVAD support (CG group), those with caregivers that resigned their roles (CG-QUIT group), and those implanted without an assigned caregiver (No-CG group). Group-specific characteristics and post-implant outcomes were compared. Results In the CG-QUIT group, caregivers did not live in the same home (0.0% vs. 80.6% of CG group) and none were spouses (0.0% vs. 64.5% for CG group). Thirty-day readmission rate was highest in the CG-QUIT group (83.3% vs. 25.8% in CG group and 16.7% in No-CG group). Conclusions Caregiver relationships were more likely to be maintained for the duration of LVAD support when the caregiver was a spouse and resided in the same home as the patient. Carefully selected patients implanted without a designated caregiver had comparable outcomes to those who retained their original caregiver.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-78
Number of pages5
JournalHeart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Heart-Assist Devices
Caregivers
Spouses

Keywords

  • Caregiver
  • Heart failure
  • Left ventricular assist device
  • Mechanical circulatory support
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device implantation. / Koeckert, Michael; Vining, Patrick; Reyentovich, Alex; Katz, Stuart D.; DeAnda, Abelardo; Philipson, Stefanie; Balsam, Leora B.

In: Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care, Vol. 46, No. 2, 01.03.2017, p. 74-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Koeckert, Michael ; Vining, Patrick ; Reyentovich, Alex ; Katz, Stuart D. ; DeAnda, Abelardo ; Philipson, Stefanie ; Balsam, Leora B. / Caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device implantation. In: Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care. 2017 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 74-78.
@article{41d3619ea94349ddb8a20e63f24502cf,
title = "Caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device implantation",
abstract = "Objectives To determine the relationship between caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Background The absence of a caregiver is a relative contraindication to durable LVAD support. Methods Forty-three patients that underwent primary LVAD implantation were divided into three groups: those with caregivers that retained their roles for the duration of LVAD support (CG group), those with caregivers that resigned their roles (CG-QUIT group), and those implanted without an assigned caregiver (No-CG group). Group-specific characteristics and post-implant outcomes were compared. Results In the CG-QUIT group, caregivers did not live in the same home (0.0{\%} vs. 80.6{\%} of CG group) and none were spouses (0.0{\%} vs. 64.5{\%} for CG group). Thirty-day readmission rate was highest in the CG-QUIT group (83.3{\%} vs. 25.8{\%} in CG group and 16.7{\%} in No-CG group). Conclusions Caregiver relationships were more likely to be maintained for the duration of LVAD support when the caregiver was a spouse and resided in the same home as the patient. Carefully selected patients implanted without a designated caregiver had comparable outcomes to those who retained their original caregiver.",
keywords = "Caregiver, Heart failure, Left ventricular assist device, Mechanical circulatory support, Outcomes",
author = "Michael Koeckert and Patrick Vining and Alex Reyentovich and Katz, {Stuart D.} and Abelardo DeAnda and Stefanie Philipson and Balsam, {Leora B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "74--78",
journal = "Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care",
issn = "0147-9563",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device implantation

AU - Koeckert, Michael

AU - Vining, Patrick

AU - Reyentovich, Alex

AU - Katz, Stuart D.

AU - DeAnda, Abelardo

AU - Philipson, Stefanie

AU - Balsam, Leora B.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objectives To determine the relationship between caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Background The absence of a caregiver is a relative contraindication to durable LVAD support. Methods Forty-three patients that underwent primary LVAD implantation were divided into three groups: those with caregivers that retained their roles for the duration of LVAD support (CG group), those with caregivers that resigned their roles (CG-QUIT group), and those implanted without an assigned caregiver (No-CG group). Group-specific characteristics and post-implant outcomes were compared. Results In the CG-QUIT group, caregivers did not live in the same home (0.0% vs. 80.6% of CG group) and none were spouses (0.0% vs. 64.5% for CG group). Thirty-day readmission rate was highest in the CG-QUIT group (83.3% vs. 25.8% in CG group and 16.7% in No-CG group). Conclusions Caregiver relationships were more likely to be maintained for the duration of LVAD support when the caregiver was a spouse and resided in the same home as the patient. Carefully selected patients implanted without a designated caregiver had comparable outcomes to those who retained their original caregiver.

AB - Objectives To determine the relationship between caregiver status and outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Background The absence of a caregiver is a relative contraindication to durable LVAD support. Methods Forty-three patients that underwent primary LVAD implantation were divided into three groups: those with caregivers that retained their roles for the duration of LVAD support (CG group), those with caregivers that resigned their roles (CG-QUIT group), and those implanted without an assigned caregiver (No-CG group). Group-specific characteristics and post-implant outcomes were compared. Results In the CG-QUIT group, caregivers did not live in the same home (0.0% vs. 80.6% of CG group) and none were spouses (0.0% vs. 64.5% for CG group). Thirty-day readmission rate was highest in the CG-QUIT group (83.3% vs. 25.8% in CG group and 16.7% in No-CG group). Conclusions Caregiver relationships were more likely to be maintained for the duration of LVAD support when the caregiver was a spouse and resided in the same home as the patient. Carefully selected patients implanted without a designated caregiver had comparable outcomes to those who retained their original caregiver.

KW - Caregiver

KW - Heart failure

KW - Left ventricular assist device

KW - Mechanical circulatory support

KW - Outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008419320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008419320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.12.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 28057337

AN - SCOPUS:85008419320

VL - 46

SP - 74

EP - 78

JO - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

JF - Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

SN - 0147-9563

IS - 2

ER -