Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome after Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery

Conor P. Delaney, Ravi P. Kiran, Anthony J. Senagore, Karen Brady, Victor W. Fazio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

219 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Comparison of outcome and costs after laparoscopic and open colectomy. Summary Background Data: Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy report conflicting results with regard to clinical outcome and costs. Methods: Laparoscopic colectomy patients from a prospective database were matched for age, gender, and disease-related grouping to patients who underwent the same operation by the open approach over the same period (2000 to 2001). Data for the latter group was gathered by retrospective analysis and the 2 groups were compared for outcome and direct costs. Results: Laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 150) were compared with the same number of open colectomy patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = 0.09), body mass index (P = 0.17), diagnosis (P = 0.12), complications (P = 0.14), and rate of readmission within 30 days (P = 0.44) were similar for both groups. Operating room costs were significantly higher after laparoscopic colectomy (P <0.0001), but length of hospital stay was significantly lower (P <0.0001). This resulted in significantly lower total costs (P = 0.0007) owing to lower pharmacy (P <0.0001), laboratory (P <0.0001), and ward nursing costs (P = 0.0004). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy results in significantly lower direct costs compared with open colectomy for carefully matched patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-72
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume238
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Colectomy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Operating Rooms
Body Mass Index
Nursing
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome after Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery. / Delaney, Conor P.; Kiran, Ravi P.; Senagore, Anthony J.; Brady, Karen; Fazio, Victor W.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 238, No. 1, 07.2003, p. 67-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delaney, Conor P. ; Kiran, Ravi P. ; Senagore, Anthony J. ; Brady, Karen ; Fazio, Victor W. / Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome after Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery. In: Annals of Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 238, No. 1. pp. 67-72.
@article{24ce50816ba444c598dd03da0821cddb,
title = "Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome after Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery",
abstract = "Objective: Comparison of outcome and costs after laparoscopic and open colectomy. Summary Background Data: Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy report conflicting results with regard to clinical outcome and costs. Methods: Laparoscopic colectomy patients from a prospective database were matched for age, gender, and disease-related grouping to patients who underwent the same operation by the open approach over the same period (2000 to 2001). Data for the latter group was gathered by retrospective analysis and the 2 groups were compared for outcome and direct costs. Results: Laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 150) were compared with the same number of open colectomy patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = 0.09), body mass index (P = 0.17), diagnosis (P = 0.12), complications (P = 0.14), and rate of readmission within 30 days (P = 0.44) were similar for both groups. Operating room costs were significantly higher after laparoscopic colectomy (P <0.0001), but length of hospital stay was significantly lower (P <0.0001). This resulted in significantly lower total costs (P = 0.0007) owing to lower pharmacy (P <0.0001), laboratory (P <0.0001), and ward nursing costs (P = 0.0004). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy results in significantly lower direct costs compared with open colectomy for carefully matched patients.",
author = "Delaney, {Conor P.} and Kiran, {Ravi P.} and Senagore, {Anthony J.} and Karen Brady and Fazio, {Victor W.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "238",
pages = "67--72",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case-Matched Comparison of Clinical and Financial Outcome after Laparoscopic or Open Colorectal Surgery

AU - Delaney, Conor P.

AU - Kiran, Ravi P.

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

AU - Brady, Karen

AU - Fazio, Victor W.

PY - 2003/7

Y1 - 2003/7

N2 - Objective: Comparison of outcome and costs after laparoscopic and open colectomy. Summary Background Data: Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy report conflicting results with regard to clinical outcome and costs. Methods: Laparoscopic colectomy patients from a prospective database were matched for age, gender, and disease-related grouping to patients who underwent the same operation by the open approach over the same period (2000 to 2001). Data for the latter group was gathered by retrospective analysis and the 2 groups were compared for outcome and direct costs. Results: Laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 150) were compared with the same number of open colectomy patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = 0.09), body mass index (P = 0.17), diagnosis (P = 0.12), complications (P = 0.14), and rate of readmission within 30 days (P = 0.44) were similar for both groups. Operating room costs were significantly higher after laparoscopic colectomy (P <0.0001), but length of hospital stay was significantly lower (P <0.0001). This resulted in significantly lower total costs (P = 0.0007) owing to lower pharmacy (P <0.0001), laboratory (P <0.0001), and ward nursing costs (P = 0.0004). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy results in significantly lower direct costs compared with open colectomy for carefully matched patients.

AB - Objective: Comparison of outcome and costs after laparoscopic and open colectomy. Summary Background Data: Previous studies comparing laparoscopic and open colectomy report conflicting results with regard to clinical outcome and costs. Methods: Laparoscopic colectomy patients from a prospective database were matched for age, gender, and disease-related grouping to patients who underwent the same operation by the open approach over the same period (2000 to 2001). Data for the latter group was gathered by retrospective analysis and the 2 groups were compared for outcome and direct costs. Results: Laparoscopic colectomy patients (n = 150) were compared with the same number of open colectomy patients. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P = 0.09), body mass index (P = 0.17), diagnosis (P = 0.12), complications (P = 0.14), and rate of readmission within 30 days (P = 0.44) were similar for both groups. Operating room costs were significantly higher after laparoscopic colectomy (P <0.0001), but length of hospital stay was significantly lower (P <0.0001). This resulted in significantly lower total costs (P = 0.0007) owing to lower pharmacy (P <0.0001), laboratory (P <0.0001), and ward nursing costs (P = 0.0004). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy results in significantly lower direct costs compared with open colectomy for carefully matched patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0041880718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0041880718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009

DO - 10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009

M3 - Article

C2 - 12832967

AN - SCOPUS:0041880718

VL - 238

SP - 67

EP - 72

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 1

ER -