Cervical facet dislocation: Management following delayed diagnosis

A. Kahn, R. Leggon, Ronald Lindsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the influence of early versus late initial presentation of patients with cervical spine facet dislocation on presentation, neurologic deficit, and the success of closed reduction. Thirty-four patients were studied, and approximately 35% presented at least 72 hours following their injury. Compared with patients who presented early, this late group demonstrated less neurologic deficit, and closed reduction was less likely to be successful. These findings suggest that a distinction should exist in the management algorithm between early versus late presentation of cervical facet dislocation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1089-1091
Number of pages3
JournalOrthopedics
Volume21
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Delayed Diagnosis
Neurologic Manifestations
Spine
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Cervical facet dislocation : Management following delayed diagnosis. / Kahn, A.; Leggon, R.; Lindsey, Ronald.

In: Orthopedics, Vol. 21, No. 10, 1998, p. 1089-1091.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kahn, A, Leggon, R & Lindsey, R 1998, 'Cervical facet dislocation: Management following delayed diagnosis', Orthopedics, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1089-1091.
Kahn, A. ; Leggon, R. ; Lindsey, Ronald. / Cervical facet dislocation : Management following delayed diagnosis. In: Orthopedics. 1998 ; Vol. 21, No. 10. pp. 1089-1091.
@article{0463c21e80154ece81a4fc1869bb0384,
title = "Cervical facet dislocation: Management following delayed diagnosis",
abstract = "This study examined the influence of early versus late initial presentation of patients with cervical spine facet dislocation on presentation, neurologic deficit, and the success of closed reduction. Thirty-four patients were studied, and approximately 35{\%} presented at least 72 hours following their injury. Compared with patients who presented early, this late group demonstrated less neurologic deficit, and closed reduction was less likely to be successful. These findings suggest that a distinction should exist in the management algorithm between early versus late presentation of cervical facet dislocation.",
author = "A. Kahn and R. Leggon and Ronald Lindsey",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1089--1091",
journal = "Orthopedics",
issn = "0147-7447",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cervical facet dislocation

T2 - Management following delayed diagnosis

AU - Kahn, A.

AU - Leggon, R.

AU - Lindsey, Ronald

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - This study examined the influence of early versus late initial presentation of patients with cervical spine facet dislocation on presentation, neurologic deficit, and the success of closed reduction. Thirty-four patients were studied, and approximately 35% presented at least 72 hours following their injury. Compared with patients who presented early, this late group demonstrated less neurologic deficit, and closed reduction was less likely to be successful. These findings suggest that a distinction should exist in the management algorithm between early versus late presentation of cervical facet dislocation.

AB - This study examined the influence of early versus late initial presentation of patients with cervical spine facet dislocation on presentation, neurologic deficit, and the success of closed reduction. Thirty-four patients were studied, and approximately 35% presented at least 72 hours following their injury. Compared with patients who presented early, this late group demonstrated less neurologic deficit, and closed reduction was less likely to be successful. These findings suggest that a distinction should exist in the management algorithm between early versus late presentation of cervical facet dislocation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031718998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031718998&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9801232

AN - SCOPUS:0031718998

VL - 21

SP - 1089

EP - 1091

JO - Orthopedics

JF - Orthopedics

SN - 0147-7447

IS - 10

ER -