Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital

D. E. Soper, C. G. Mayhall, J. W. Froggatt, M. E. Baker, H. Hopwood, T. Nesbitt, J. Thorp, Gary Hankins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine (1) whether risk factors for intraamniotic infection were similar in women delivered of preterm infants versus term infants and (2) whether infection control techniques could decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever on a labor and delivery unit. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5409 consecutive patients (group 1) admitted to the Medical College of Virginia's labor and delivery unit were followed up prospectively to determine the development of intraamniotic infection. Demographic and intrapartum data were collected by use of a standard data form by infection control practitioners. An additional 2549 consecutive patients (group 2) were followed up after institution of infection-control measures. RESULTS: Intraamniotic infection occurred in 416 of 5399 (7.7%) women (group 1) admitted to the labor and delivery suite. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with rupture of membranes ≤12 hours compared with <12 hours were 5.81 (95% confidence interval 512 to 6.59) and 2.49 (95% confidence interval 1.77 to 3.50), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients with internal monitors having intraamniotic infection compared with patients in whom internal monitors were not used were 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.4) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 2.04), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with more than four vaginal examinations compared with four or fewer vaginal examinations was 3.07 (95% confidence interval 2.53-3.73) and 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.27), respectively. Intrapartum fever occurred in 475 (8.8%) women in group 1 and in 252 (9.8%) women in group 2 (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors (duration of ruptured membranes, use of internal monitoring, number of vaginal examinations) were similar in both term and preterm women with intraamniotic infection. Infection control measures failed to decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever in our patient population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)304-310
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume175
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urban Hospitals
Infection Control
Teaching Hospitals
Confidence Intervals
Gynecological Examination
Infection
Fever
Odds Ratio
Infection Control Practitioners
Membranes
Incidence
Premature Infants
Rupture
Demography
Population

Keywords

  • Chorioamnionitis
  • fetal monitoring
  • infection control
  • intraamniotic infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Soper, D. E., Mayhall, C. G., Froggatt, J. W., Baker, M. E., Hopwood, H., Nesbitt, T., ... Hankins, G. (1996). Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175(2), 304-310.

Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. / Soper, D. E.; Mayhall, C. G.; Froggatt, J. W.; Baker, M. E.; Hopwood, H.; Nesbitt, T.; Thorp, J.; Hankins, Gary.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 175, No. 2, 1996, p. 304-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Soper, DE, Mayhall, CG, Froggatt, JW, Baker, ME, Hopwood, H, Nesbitt, T, Thorp, J & Hankins, G 1996, 'Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 304-310.
Soper DE, Mayhall CG, Froggatt JW, Baker ME, Hopwood H, Nesbitt T et al. Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996;175(2):304-310.
Soper, D. E. ; Mayhall, C. G. ; Froggatt, J. W. ; Baker, M. E. ; Hopwood, H. ; Nesbitt, T. ; Thorp, J. ; Hankins, Gary. / Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996 ; Vol. 175, No. 2. pp. 304-310.
@article{89541ee83d5640b4bd7e3cbf070b1f2a,
title = "Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine (1) whether risk factors for intraamniotic infection were similar in women delivered of preterm infants versus term infants and (2) whether infection control techniques could decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever on a labor and delivery unit. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5409 consecutive patients (group 1) admitted to the Medical College of Virginia's labor and delivery unit were followed up prospectively to determine the development of intraamniotic infection. Demographic and intrapartum data were collected by use of a standard data form by infection control practitioners. An additional 2549 consecutive patients (group 2) were followed up after institution of infection-control measures. RESULTS: Intraamniotic infection occurred in 416 of 5399 (7.7{\%}) women (group 1) admitted to the labor and delivery suite. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with rupture of membranes ≤12 hours compared with <12 hours were 5.81 (95{\%} confidence interval 512 to 6.59) and 2.49 (95{\%} confidence interval 1.77 to 3.50), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients with internal monitors having intraamniotic infection compared with patients in whom internal monitors were not used were 2.01 (95{\%} confidence interval 1.7 to 2.4) and 1.42 (95{\%} confidence interval 0.99 to 2.04), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with more than four vaginal examinations compared with four or fewer vaginal examinations was 3.07 (95{\%} confidence interval 2.53-3.73) and 1.59 (95{\%} confidence interval 1.11-2.27), respectively. Intrapartum fever occurred in 475 (8.8{\%}) women in group 1 and in 252 (9.8{\%}) women in group 2 (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors (duration of ruptured membranes, use of internal monitoring, number of vaginal examinations) were similar in both term and preterm women with intraamniotic infection. Infection control measures failed to decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever in our patient population.",
keywords = "Chorioamnionitis, fetal monitoring, infection control, intraamniotic infection",
author = "Soper, {D. E.} and Mayhall, {C. G.} and Froggatt, {J. W.} and Baker, {M. E.} and H. Hopwood and T. Nesbitt and J. Thorp and Gary Hankins",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "175",
pages = "304--310",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characterization and control of intraamniotic infection in an urban teaching hospital

AU - Soper, D. E.

AU - Mayhall, C. G.

AU - Froggatt, J. W.

AU - Baker, M. E.

AU - Hopwood, H.

AU - Nesbitt, T.

AU - Thorp, J.

AU - Hankins, Gary

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine (1) whether risk factors for intraamniotic infection were similar in women delivered of preterm infants versus term infants and (2) whether infection control techniques could decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever on a labor and delivery unit. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5409 consecutive patients (group 1) admitted to the Medical College of Virginia's labor and delivery unit were followed up prospectively to determine the development of intraamniotic infection. Demographic and intrapartum data were collected by use of a standard data form by infection control practitioners. An additional 2549 consecutive patients (group 2) were followed up after institution of infection-control measures. RESULTS: Intraamniotic infection occurred in 416 of 5399 (7.7%) women (group 1) admitted to the labor and delivery suite. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with rupture of membranes ≤12 hours compared with <12 hours were 5.81 (95% confidence interval 512 to 6.59) and 2.49 (95% confidence interval 1.77 to 3.50), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients with internal monitors having intraamniotic infection compared with patients in whom internal monitors were not used were 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.4) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 2.04), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with more than four vaginal examinations compared with four or fewer vaginal examinations was 3.07 (95% confidence interval 2.53-3.73) and 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.27), respectively. Intrapartum fever occurred in 475 (8.8%) women in group 1 and in 252 (9.8%) women in group 2 (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors (duration of ruptured membranes, use of internal monitoring, number of vaginal examinations) were similar in both term and preterm women with intraamniotic infection. Infection control measures failed to decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever in our patient population.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to determine (1) whether risk factors for intraamniotic infection were similar in women delivered of preterm infants versus term infants and (2) whether infection control techniques could decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever on a labor and delivery unit. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 5409 consecutive patients (group 1) admitted to the Medical College of Virginia's labor and delivery unit were followed up prospectively to determine the development of intraamniotic infection. Demographic and intrapartum data were collected by use of a standard data form by infection control practitioners. An additional 2549 consecutive patients (group 2) were followed up after institution of infection-control measures. RESULTS: Intraamniotic infection occurred in 416 of 5399 (7.7%) women (group 1) admitted to the labor and delivery suite. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with rupture of membranes ≤12 hours compared with <12 hours were 5.81 (95% confidence interval 512 to 6.59) and 2.49 (95% confidence interval 1.77 to 3.50), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients with internal monitors having intraamniotic infection compared with patients in whom internal monitors were not used were 2.01 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.4) and 1.42 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 2.04), respectively. Odds ratios for term and preterm patients having intraamniotic infection with more than four vaginal examinations compared with four or fewer vaginal examinations was 3.07 (95% confidence interval 2.53-3.73) and 1.59 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.27), respectively. Intrapartum fever occurred in 475 (8.8%) women in group 1 and in 252 (9.8%) women in group 2 (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors (duration of ruptured membranes, use of internal monitoring, number of vaginal examinations) were similar in both term and preterm women with intraamniotic infection. Infection control measures failed to decrease the incidence of intrapartum fever in our patient population.

KW - Chorioamnionitis

KW - fetal monitoring

KW - infection control

KW - intraamniotic infection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029823341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029823341&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8765246

AN - SCOPUS:0029823341

VL - 175

SP - 304

EP - 310

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 2

ER -