Clarifying Conflict of Interest

Howard Brody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As the debate over how to manage or discourage physicians' financial conflicts of interest with the drug and medical device industries has become more heated, critics have questioned or dismissed the concept of "conflict of interest" itself. A satisfactory definition relates conflict of interest to concerns about maintaining social trust and distinguishes between breaches of ethical duty and temptations to breach duty. Numerous objections to such a definition have been offered, none of which prevails on further analysis. Those concerned about conflicts of interest have contributed to misunderstandings, however, by failing to demonstrate when social arrangements leading to temptations to breach duties are in themselves morally blameworthy. Clarifying "conflict of interest" is important if we are eventually going to develop productive modes of engagement between medicine and for-profit industry that avoid the serious ethical pitfalls now in evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-28
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Conflict of Interest
Industry
Medicine
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Keywords

  • biomedical research
  • conflict of interest
  • pharmaceutical industry
  • professional ethics
  • regulatory issues

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Clarifying Conflict of Interest. / Brody, Howard.

In: American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 23-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brody, Howard. / Clarifying Conflict of Interest. In: American Journal of Bioethics. 2011 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 23-28.
@article{69cfa2bb98224da18f88ecebb8452133,
title = "Clarifying Conflict of Interest",
abstract = "As the debate over how to manage or discourage physicians' financial conflicts of interest with the drug and medical device industries has become more heated, critics have questioned or dismissed the concept of {"}conflict of interest{"} itself. A satisfactory definition relates conflict of interest to concerns about maintaining social trust and distinguishes between breaches of ethical duty and temptations to breach duty. Numerous objections to such a definition have been offered, none of which prevails on further analysis. Those concerned about conflicts of interest have contributed to misunderstandings, however, by failing to demonstrate when social arrangements leading to temptations to breach duties are in themselves morally blameworthy. Clarifying {"}conflict of interest{"} is important if we are eventually going to develop productive modes of engagement between medicine and for-profit industry that avoid the serious ethical pitfalls now in evidence.",
keywords = "biomedical research, conflict of interest, pharmaceutical industry, professional ethics, regulatory issues",
author = "Howard Brody",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15265161.2010.534530",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "23--28",
journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "1526-5161",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clarifying Conflict of Interest

AU - Brody, Howard

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - As the debate over how to manage or discourage physicians' financial conflicts of interest with the drug and medical device industries has become more heated, critics have questioned or dismissed the concept of "conflict of interest" itself. A satisfactory definition relates conflict of interest to concerns about maintaining social trust and distinguishes between breaches of ethical duty and temptations to breach duty. Numerous objections to such a definition have been offered, none of which prevails on further analysis. Those concerned about conflicts of interest have contributed to misunderstandings, however, by failing to demonstrate when social arrangements leading to temptations to breach duties are in themselves morally blameworthy. Clarifying "conflict of interest" is important if we are eventually going to develop productive modes of engagement between medicine and for-profit industry that avoid the serious ethical pitfalls now in evidence.

AB - As the debate over how to manage or discourage physicians' financial conflicts of interest with the drug and medical device industries has become more heated, critics have questioned or dismissed the concept of "conflict of interest" itself. A satisfactory definition relates conflict of interest to concerns about maintaining social trust and distinguishes between breaches of ethical duty and temptations to breach duty. Numerous objections to such a definition have been offered, none of which prevails on further analysis. Those concerned about conflicts of interest have contributed to misunderstandings, however, by failing to demonstrate when social arrangements leading to temptations to breach duties are in themselves morally blameworthy. Clarifying "conflict of interest" is important if we are eventually going to develop productive modes of engagement between medicine and for-profit industry that avoid the serious ethical pitfalls now in evidence.

KW - biomedical research

KW - conflict of interest

KW - pharmaceutical industry

KW - professional ethics

KW - regulatory issues

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952478751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952478751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15265161.2010.534530

DO - 10.1080/15265161.2010.534530

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 1

ER -