Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: A review and anatomical study

R. Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas, John B. Slappey, Mohammadali Mohajel Shoja, W. Jerry Oakes, E. George Salter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Discrepancies abound in the literature regarding the anatomy and incidence of the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami. The present study was performed to elucidate further the detailed anatomy of these structures and to review their clinical relevance. Thirty-adult cadavers were used for this study. The mean age for this group was 72 years. C1 and C2 spinal nerves were identified in 100% of the specimens examined. In 46.6% of specimens, C1 dorsal rootlets were identified and of these, 28.5% had an associated dorsal root ganglion. In 50% of specimens, the spinal accessory nerve joined with dorsal rootlets of C1. C1 in these cases did not possess a dorsal root ganglion. There were no significant differences between left sides, gender, and age (P > 0.05). Additional knowledge regarding the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami may be of use to the clinician who treats various pain syndromes including medically and surgically intractable occipital neuralgia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)624-627
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 13 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spinal Ganglia
Anatomy
Accessory Nerve
Spinal Nerves
Neuralgia
Cadaver
Age Groups
Pain
Incidence

Keywords

  • Anatomy
  • Craniocervical junction
  • Occipital neuralgia
  • Spinal nerves

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy

Cite this

Tubbs, R. S., Loukas, M., Slappey, J. B., Mohajel Shoja, M., Oakes, W. J., & Salter, E. G. (2007). Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: A review and anatomical study. Clinical Anatomy, 20(6), 624-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20472

Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus : A review and anatomical study. / Tubbs, R. Shane; Loukas, Marios; Slappey, John B.; Mohajel Shoja, Mohammadali; Oakes, W. Jerry; Salter, E. George.

In: Clinical Anatomy, Vol. 20, No. 6, 13.09.2007, p. 624-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tubbs, RS, Loukas, M, Slappey, JB, Mohajel Shoja, M, Oakes, WJ & Salter, EG 2007, 'Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: A review and anatomical study', Clinical Anatomy, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 624-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20472
Tubbs RS, Loukas M, Slappey JB, Mohajel Shoja M, Oakes WJ, Salter EG. Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: A review and anatomical study. Clinical Anatomy. 2007 Sep 13;20(6):624-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20472
Tubbs, R. Shane ; Loukas, Marios ; Slappey, John B. ; Mohajel Shoja, Mohammadali ; Oakes, W. Jerry ; Salter, E. George. / Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus : A review and anatomical study. In: Clinical Anatomy. 2007 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 624-627.
@article{e65d214f96b64305b0c509e082ca93fb,
title = "Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus: A review and anatomical study",
abstract = "Discrepancies abound in the literature regarding the anatomy and incidence of the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami. The present study was performed to elucidate further the detailed anatomy of these structures and to review their clinical relevance. Thirty-adult cadavers were used for this study. The mean age for this group was 72 years. C1 and C2 spinal nerves were identified in 100{\%} of the specimens examined. In 46.6{\%} of specimens, C1 dorsal rootlets were identified and of these, 28.5{\%} had an associated dorsal root ganglion. In 50{\%} of specimens, the spinal accessory nerve joined with dorsal rootlets of C1. C1 in these cases did not possess a dorsal root ganglion. There were no significant differences between left sides, gender, and age (P > 0.05). Additional knowledge regarding the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami may be of use to the clinician who treats various pain syndromes including medically and surgically intractable occipital neuralgia.",
keywords = "Anatomy, Craniocervical junction, Occipital neuralgia, Spinal nerves",
author = "Tubbs, {R. Shane} and Marios Loukas and Slappey, {John B.} and {Mohajel Shoja}, Mohammadali and Oakes, {W. Jerry} and Salter, {E. George}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1002/ca.20472",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "624--627",
journal = "Clinical Anatomy",
issn = "0897-3806",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical anatomy of the C1 dorsal root, ganglion, and ramus

T2 - A review and anatomical study

AU - Tubbs, R. Shane

AU - Loukas, Marios

AU - Slappey, John B.

AU - Mohajel Shoja, Mohammadali

AU - Oakes, W. Jerry

AU - Salter, E. George

PY - 2007/9/13

Y1 - 2007/9/13

N2 - Discrepancies abound in the literature regarding the anatomy and incidence of the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami. The present study was performed to elucidate further the detailed anatomy of these structures and to review their clinical relevance. Thirty-adult cadavers were used for this study. The mean age for this group was 72 years. C1 and C2 spinal nerves were identified in 100% of the specimens examined. In 46.6% of specimens, C1 dorsal rootlets were identified and of these, 28.5% had an associated dorsal root ganglion. In 50% of specimens, the spinal accessory nerve joined with dorsal rootlets of C1. C1 in these cases did not possess a dorsal root ganglion. There were no significant differences between left sides, gender, and age (P > 0.05). Additional knowledge regarding the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami may be of use to the clinician who treats various pain syndromes including medically and surgically intractable occipital neuralgia.

AB - Discrepancies abound in the literature regarding the anatomy and incidence of the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami. The present study was performed to elucidate further the detailed anatomy of these structures and to review their clinical relevance. Thirty-adult cadavers were used for this study. The mean age for this group was 72 years. C1 and C2 spinal nerves were identified in 100% of the specimens examined. In 46.6% of specimens, C1 dorsal rootlets were identified and of these, 28.5% had an associated dorsal root ganglion. In 50% of specimens, the spinal accessory nerve joined with dorsal rootlets of C1. C1 in these cases did not possess a dorsal root ganglion. There were no significant differences between left sides, gender, and age (P > 0.05). Additional knowledge regarding the C1 dorsal roots, ganglia, and rami may be of use to the clinician who treats various pain syndromes including medically and surgically intractable occipital neuralgia.

KW - Anatomy

KW - Craniocervical junction

KW - Occipital neuralgia

KW - Spinal nerves

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548475360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548475360&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ca.20472

DO - 10.1002/ca.20472

M3 - Article

C2 - 17330847

AN - SCOPUS:34548475360

VL - 20

SP - 624

EP - 627

JO - Clinical Anatomy

JF - Clinical Anatomy

SN - 0897-3806

IS - 6

ER -