TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device
T2 - intra-procedural technical difficulties, major morbidity, and neurological mortality decrease significantly with increased operator experience in device deployment and patient management
AU - Delgado Almandoz, Josser E.
AU - Kayan, Yasha
AU - Tenreiro, Andrea
AU - Wallace, Adam N.
AU - Scholz, Jill M.
AU - Fease, Jennifer L.
AU - Milner, Anna M.
AU - Mulder, Maximilian
AU - Uittenbogaard, Kyle M.
AU - Tenreiro-Picón, Oscar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Flow diversion constitutes a pivotal advancement in endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment, but requires development of a new skill set. The aim of this study is to determine whether outcomes after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device improve with experience. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline at two centers over a 4.5-year period. Baseline patient and aneurysm characteristics, complications, and angiographic outcomes were analyzed. Results: One hundred forty patients underwent 150 Pipeline procedures to treat 167 intracranial aneurysms during the study period, 109 women, mean age 55.4 years. One hundred twenty-six aneurysms were ICA, mean size 10.2 mm and mean neck 6.4 mm. Intra-procedural technical difficulties were higher during the first 75 procedures compared with the subsequent 75 (13.3 vs 2.7%; p = 0.03), as combined major morbidity and neurological mortality (14.7 vs 4%; p = 0.046). In multivariate regression analysis, increased operator experience with Pipeline remained an independent predictor of intra-procedural technical difficulties (p = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 0.015, 95% CI 0.0004–0.55) and combined major morbidity and neurological mortality (p = 0.03, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.84). At last follow-up, 123 aneurysms were completely occluded (81.5%, mean 24 months). In our cohort, age ≤ 53 years was an independent predictor of complete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up (p = 0.001, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97). Five aneurysms were retreated (3.3%). Conclusion: The Pipeline embolization device is an effective treatment for intracranial aneurysms. The risk of intra-procedural technical difficulties and combined major morbidity and neurological mortality decreases significantly with increased operator experience in Pipeline deployment and patient management.
AB - Purpose: Flow diversion constitutes a pivotal advancement in endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment, but requires development of a new skill set. The aim of this study is to determine whether outcomes after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device improve with experience. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline at two centers over a 4.5-year period. Baseline patient and aneurysm characteristics, complications, and angiographic outcomes were analyzed. Results: One hundred forty patients underwent 150 Pipeline procedures to treat 167 intracranial aneurysms during the study period, 109 women, mean age 55.4 years. One hundred twenty-six aneurysms were ICA, mean size 10.2 mm and mean neck 6.4 mm. Intra-procedural technical difficulties were higher during the first 75 procedures compared with the subsequent 75 (13.3 vs 2.7%; p = 0.03), as combined major morbidity and neurological mortality (14.7 vs 4%; p = 0.046). In multivariate regression analysis, increased operator experience with Pipeline remained an independent predictor of intra-procedural technical difficulties (p = 0.02, odds ratio (OR) 0.015, 95% CI 0.0004–0.55) and combined major morbidity and neurological mortality (p = 0.03, OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.84). At last follow-up, 123 aneurysms were completely occluded (81.5%, mean 24 months). In our cohort, age ≤ 53 years was an independent predictor of complete aneurysm occlusion at last follow-up (p = 0.001, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97). Five aneurysms were retreated (3.3%). Conclusion: The Pipeline embolization device is an effective treatment for intracranial aneurysms. The risk of intra-procedural technical difficulties and combined major morbidity and neurological mortality decreases significantly with increased operator experience in Pipeline deployment and patient management.
KW - Aneurysm
KW - Flow diverter
KW - Hemorrhage
KW - Pipeline
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030700508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030700508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00234-017-1930-z
DO - 10.1007/s00234-017-1930-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 28986614
AN - SCOPUS:85030700508
SN - 0028-3940
VL - 59
SP - 1291
EP - 1299
JO - Neuroradiology
JF - Neuroradiology
IS - 12
ER -