Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships

Gregory W. Briscoe, David L. Carlson, Lisa Fore Arcand, Ruth Levine, Mitchell J. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The clinical grade assessment is the most frequently used and heavily weighted component in the overall assessment of U.S. psychiatry clerkship students, yet the topic is understudied. The authors aimed to learn more about the nature, perceived virtues, and deficiencies of the clinical grade evaluation. Methods: A 26-item questionnaire regarding the psychiatry clerkship clinical grading form was distributed to the clerkship directors of 129 medical schools in the U.S. and U.S. territories. The design of the document, its strengths, its weaknesses, grading outcomes, and utilization were assessed. Results: Trends regarding clinical grading in psychiatry clerkships were detected. The clerkship grade form similarities, differences, desirable features, and utilization were ascertained, as were areas for improvement. Conclusions: The search for an optimal clinical grading process for the thousands of third-year medical students rotating annually is formidable. However, collaboration among psychiatry clerkship directors on development and improvement of clinical evaluation forms can clarify learning objectives and lead to better clinical evaluation tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-109
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Psychiatry
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

grading
psychiatry
Psychiatry
director
Clinical Clerkship
utilization
evaluation
faropenem medoxomil
learning objective
Medical Schools
Medical Students
medical student
Learning
Students
questionnaire
trend
school
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Education

Cite this

Briscoe, G. W., Carlson, D. L., Arcand, L. F., Levine, R., & Cohen, M. J. (2006). Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships. Academic Psychiatry, 30(2), 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.104

Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships. / Briscoe, Gregory W.; Carlson, David L.; Arcand, Lisa Fore; Levine, Ruth; Cohen, Mitchell J.

In: Academic Psychiatry, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2006, p. 104-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Briscoe, GW, Carlson, DL, Arcand, LF, Levine, R & Cohen, MJ 2006, 'Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships', Academic Psychiatry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.104
Briscoe, Gregory W. ; Carlson, David L. ; Arcand, Lisa Fore ; Levine, Ruth ; Cohen, Mitchell J. / Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships. In: Academic Psychiatry. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 104-109.
@article{20659f1aa0c34243bbc4539573d90006,
title = "Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships",
abstract = "Objective: The clinical grade assessment is the most frequently used and heavily weighted component in the overall assessment of U.S. psychiatry clerkship students, yet the topic is understudied. The authors aimed to learn more about the nature, perceived virtues, and deficiencies of the clinical grade evaluation. Methods: A 26-item questionnaire regarding the psychiatry clerkship clinical grading form was distributed to the clerkship directors of 129 medical schools in the U.S. and U.S. territories. The design of the document, its strengths, its weaknesses, grading outcomes, and utilization were assessed. Results: Trends regarding clinical grading in psychiatry clerkships were detected. The clerkship grade form similarities, differences, desirable features, and utilization were ascertained, as were areas for improvement. Conclusions: The search for an optimal clinical grading process for the thousands of third-year medical students rotating annually is formidable. However, collaboration among psychiatry clerkship directors on development and improvement of clinical evaluation forms can clarify learning objectives and lead to better clinical evaluation tools.",
author = "Briscoe, {Gregory W.} and Carlson, {David L.} and Arcand, {Lisa Fore} and Ruth Levine and Cohen, {Mitchell J.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "104--109",
journal = "Academic Psychiatry",
issn = "1042-9670",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Publishing Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical grading in psychiatric clerkships

AU - Briscoe, Gregory W.

AU - Carlson, David L.

AU - Arcand, Lisa Fore

AU - Levine, Ruth

AU - Cohen, Mitchell J.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Objective: The clinical grade assessment is the most frequently used and heavily weighted component in the overall assessment of U.S. psychiatry clerkship students, yet the topic is understudied. The authors aimed to learn more about the nature, perceived virtues, and deficiencies of the clinical grade evaluation. Methods: A 26-item questionnaire regarding the psychiatry clerkship clinical grading form was distributed to the clerkship directors of 129 medical schools in the U.S. and U.S. territories. The design of the document, its strengths, its weaknesses, grading outcomes, and utilization were assessed. Results: Trends regarding clinical grading in psychiatry clerkships were detected. The clerkship grade form similarities, differences, desirable features, and utilization were ascertained, as were areas for improvement. Conclusions: The search for an optimal clinical grading process for the thousands of third-year medical students rotating annually is formidable. However, collaboration among psychiatry clerkship directors on development and improvement of clinical evaluation forms can clarify learning objectives and lead to better clinical evaluation tools.

AB - Objective: The clinical grade assessment is the most frequently used and heavily weighted component in the overall assessment of U.S. psychiatry clerkship students, yet the topic is understudied. The authors aimed to learn more about the nature, perceived virtues, and deficiencies of the clinical grade evaluation. Methods: A 26-item questionnaire regarding the psychiatry clerkship clinical grading form was distributed to the clerkship directors of 129 medical schools in the U.S. and U.S. territories. The design of the document, its strengths, its weaknesses, grading outcomes, and utilization were assessed. Results: Trends regarding clinical grading in psychiatry clerkships were detected. The clerkship grade form similarities, differences, desirable features, and utilization were ascertained, as were areas for improvement. Conclusions: The search for an optimal clinical grading process for the thousands of third-year medical students rotating annually is formidable. However, collaboration among psychiatry clerkship directors on development and improvement of clinical evaluation forms can clarify learning objectives and lead to better clinical evaluation tools.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749026377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749026377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.104

DO - 10.1176/appi.ap.30.2.104

M3 - Article

C2 - 16609114

AN - SCOPUS:33749026377

VL - 30

SP - 104

EP - 109

JO - Academic Psychiatry

JF - Academic Psychiatry

SN - 1042-9670

IS - 2

ER -