Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical outcome after total neoadjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) versus intensified neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) a comparison between two multicenter randomized phase II/III trials

  • Markus Diefenhardt
  • , Maximillian Fleischmann
  • , Daniel Martin
  • , Ralf Dieter Hofheinz
  • , Pompiliu Piso
  • , Christoph Thomas Germer
  • , Peter Hambsch
  • , Robert Grützmann
  • , Simon Kirste
  • , Anke Schlenska-Lange
  • , Michael Ghadimi
  • , Claus Rödel
  • , Emmanouil Fokas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) can enhance local tumor regression, but its survival benefits compared to intensified chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) remain unclear. Methods: This is a secondary comparison between 607 patients treated with intensified 5-FU/Oxaliplatin neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial, and 306 patients treated with TNT within the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 phase II trial. Comparison between clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical quality, and post-surgical complications were analyzed using the Pearson's Chi-squared or Mann-Whitney U test. Oncological outcome was examined with log-rank, Gray's test, and multivariate cox regression. In addition, further subgroup analyses and propensity score matching were performed to optimize the balance of baseline covariates. Findings: Patients treated with CRT followed by consolidation CT had a significantly higher rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) compared to patients treated within the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial (25.3 % vs 17.3 %, P = 0.04). Post-surgical complications were less common in the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial. After a median follow-up of 46 months, clinical outcome did not differ significantly in the overall cohort, in any subgroup or after propensity score matching. In multivariate analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the experimental arm of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial and treatments arms of the CAO/ARO/AIO-12 trial (vs arm A: HR 0.92 [95 % CI 0.62–1.37], P = 0.69; vs arm B: HR 1.06 [95 % CI 0.72–1.58], P = 0.76). Interpretation: Notwithstanding the limitations of intertrial comparison, TNT did not improve long term oncological outcome in our study compared to the intensified neoadjuvant CRT and adjuvant CT treatment in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial. Improved response rates after TNT offers an attractive option to explore organ preservation in selective patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number109455
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume179
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Oxaliplatin
  • Radiotherapy
  • Rectal cancer
  • Survival
  • TNT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcome after total neoadjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-12) versus intensified neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) a comparison between two multicenter randomized phase II/III trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this