TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical significance of quantitative assessment of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) in patients with constipation
AU - Xu, Xiaohong
AU - Pasricha, Pankaj J.
AU - Sallam, Hanaa S.
AU - Ma, Long
AU - Chen, Jiande D.Z.
PY - 2008/7
Y1 - 2008/7
N2 - BACKGROUND: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. METHODS: Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. RESULTS: Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50% was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64% and a sensitivity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.
AB - BACKGROUND: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. METHODS: Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. RESULTS: Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50% was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64% and a sensitivity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54749097167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54749097167&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31814927ba
DO - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31814927ba
M3 - Article
C2 - 18496393
AN - SCOPUS:54749097167
SN - 0192-0790
VL - 42
SP - 692
EP - 698
JO - Journal of clinical gastroenterology
JF - Journal of clinical gastroenterology
IS - 6
ER -