Clinical significance of quantitative assessment of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) in patients with constipation

Xiaohong Xu, Pankaj J. Pasricha, Hanaa Sallam, Long Ma, Jiande D.Z. Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. METHODS: Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. RESULTS: Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50% was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64% and a sensitivity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)692-698
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of clinical gastroenterology
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Constipation
Reflex
Fecal Incontinence
Healthy Volunteers
Pressure
Manometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Clinical significance of quantitative assessment of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) in patients with constipation. / Xu, Xiaohong; Pasricha, Pankaj J.; Sallam, Hanaa; Ma, Long; Chen, Jiande D.Z.

In: Journal of clinical gastroenterology, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.07.2008, p. 692-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a39d5bfdeba843c0be8477d7b0e7421b,
title = "Clinical significance of quantitative assessment of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) in patients with constipation",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. METHODS: Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. RESULTS: Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50{\%} was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64{\%} and a sensitivity of 67{\%}. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.",
author = "Xiaohong Xu and Pasricha, {Pankaj J.} and Hanaa Sallam and Long Ma and Chen, {Jiande D.Z.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MCG.0b013e31814927ba",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "692--698",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology",
issn = "0192-0790",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical significance of quantitative assessment of rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) in patients with constipation

AU - Xu, Xiaohong

AU - Pasricha, Pankaj J.

AU - Sallam, Hanaa

AU - Ma, Long

AU - Chen, Jiande D.Z.

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. METHODS: Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. RESULTS: Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50% was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64% and a sensitivity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.

AB - BACKGROUND: Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) is routinely assessed in anorectal manometry and is of clinical value in the diagnosis of patients with constipation. However, no quantitative analysis is currently available for the assessment of RAIR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of RAIR in patients with constipation. METHODS: Nine healthy subjects, 22 constipation patients (CO) and 26 fecal incontinence patients (FI) were enrolled in this study. RAIR was solicited by inflating the balloon with various volumes from 10 to 50mL. The percentage of relaxation was determined on the basis of the rectal resting sphincter pressure and residual pressure with the balloon distention. RESULTS: Percentage of internal sphincter relaxation induced by rectal distention in constipation patients was significantly lower with distention of 20, 30, 40, and 50mL in comparison with that in healthy subjects (Mixed model, P<0.05). The volume of distention required to achieve a relaxation of 50% was significantly higher in patients with CO (37.3±3.1mL) than that in healthy subjects (27.8±2.6mL, P<0.03) or FI (26.3±2.3mL, P<0.05). It was also found that the percentage of relaxation could be used to differentiate the patients with constipation with a specificity of 64% and a sensitivity of 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CO have impaired RAIR in comparison with healthy subjects and patients with FI. Quantitative assessment of RAIR is valuable in the diagnosis of patients with CO and may be incorporated in the clinical anorectal manometric test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54749097167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54749097167&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31814927ba

DO - 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31814927ba

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 692

EP - 698

JO - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

JF - Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology

SN - 0192-0790

IS - 6

ER -