Clinically relevant designs for rehabilitation research: The idiographic model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traditional rehabilitation research involves designs emphasizing between-subject statistical evaluation and comparisons across two or more groups. The argument is made that these designs are often of limited use in clinical environments characterized by small samples and large within-group variability. The idiographic model of research design is presented as one alternative to traditional group comparison design. Idiographic, or single-subject, research emphasizes continuous monitoring of patient performance within a specified design framework. The advantages and limitations of both single-subject and group comparison designs are presented. Both designs can help establish the efficacy of rehabilitation practice and contribute to rehabilitation science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume70
Issue number1 SUPPL.
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Design
Rehabilitation
Physiologic Monitoring
Research
Rehabilitation Research

Keywords

  • intrasubject research
  • Single-subject design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

@article{44de892bcf224ca29efb9d4f1e489b68,
title = "Clinically relevant designs for rehabilitation research: The idiographic model",
abstract = "Traditional rehabilitation research involves designs emphasizing between-subject statistical evaluation and comparisons across two or more groups. The argument is made that these designs are often of limited use in clinical environments characterized by small samples and large within-group variability. The idiographic model of research design is presented as one alternative to traditional group comparison design. Idiographic, or single-subject, research emphasizes continuous monitoring of patient performance within a specified design framework. The advantages and limitations of both single-subject and group comparison designs are presented. Both designs can help establish the efficacy of rehabilitation practice and contribute to rehabilitation science.",
keywords = "intrasubject research, Single-subject design",
author = "Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0894-9115",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinically relevant designs for rehabilitation research

T2 - The idiographic model

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Traditional rehabilitation research involves designs emphasizing between-subject statistical evaluation and comparisons across two or more groups. The argument is made that these designs are often of limited use in clinical environments characterized by small samples and large within-group variability. The idiographic model of research design is presented as one alternative to traditional group comparison design. Idiographic, or single-subject, research emphasizes continuous monitoring of patient performance within a specified design framework. The advantages and limitations of both single-subject and group comparison designs are presented. Both designs can help establish the efficacy of rehabilitation practice and contribute to rehabilitation science.

AB - Traditional rehabilitation research involves designs emphasizing between-subject statistical evaluation and comparisons across two or more groups. The argument is made that these designs are often of limited use in clinical environments characterized by small samples and large within-group variability. The idiographic model of research design is presented as one alternative to traditional group comparison design. Idiographic, or single-subject, research emphasizes continuous monitoring of patient performance within a specified design framework. The advantages and limitations of both single-subject and group comparison designs are presented. Both designs can help establish the efficacy of rehabilitation practice and contribute to rehabilitation science.

KW - intrasubject research

KW - Single-subject design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025977464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025977464&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025977464

VL - 70

JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0894-9115

IS - 1 SUPPL.

ER -