Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007

Nusrat Homaira, Mahmudur Rahman, M. Jahangir Hossain, Nazmun Nahar, Rasheda Khan, Mostafizur Rahman, Goutam Podder, Kamrun Nahar, Dawlat Khan, Emily S. Gurley, Pierre E. Rollin, James A. Comer, Thomas Ksiazek, Stephen P. Luby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: In March 2007, we investigated a cluster of Nipah encephalitis to identify risk factors for Nipah infection in Bangladesh. Methods: We defined confirmed Nipah cases by the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus in serum. Casepatients, who resided in the same village during the outbreak period but died before serum could be collected, were classified as probable cases. Results: We identified three confirmed and five probable Nipah cases. There was a single index case. Five of the secondary cases came in close physical contact to the index case when she was ill. Case-patients were more likely to have physical contact with the index case (71% cases versus 0% controls, p=<0.001). The index case, on her third day of illness, and all the subsequent cases attended the same religious gathering. For three probable cases including the index case, we could not identify any known risk factors for Nipah infection such as physical contact with Nipah case-patients, consumption of raw date palm juice, or contact with sick animals or fruit bats. Conclusion: Though person-to-person transmission remains an important mode of transmission for Nipah infection, we could not confirm the source of infection for three of the probable Nipah case-patients. Continued surveillance and outbreak investigations will help better understand the transmission of Nipah virus and develop preventive strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere13570
JournalPLoS One
Volume5
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Nipah Virus
Nipah virus
Bangladesh
Virus Diseases
Viruses
Disease Outbreaks
Infection
infection
Sick Leave
Infectious Disease Transmission
risk factors
Encephalitis
Fruits
outbreak investigation
Serum
Phoenix dactylifera
Immunoglobulin M
Fruit
Animals
encephalitis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Homaira, N., Rahman, M., Hossain, M. J., Nahar, N., Khan, R., Rahman, M., ... Luby, S. P. (2010). Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007. PLoS One, 5(10), [e13570]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013570

Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007. / Homaira, Nusrat; Rahman, Mahmudur; Hossain, M. Jahangir; Nahar, Nazmun; Khan, Rasheda; Rahman, Mostafizur; Podder, Goutam; Nahar, Kamrun; Khan, Dawlat; Gurley, Emily S.; Rollin, Pierre E.; Comer, James A.; Ksiazek, Thomas; Luby, Stephen P.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 5, No. 10, e13570, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Homaira, N, Rahman, M, Hossain, MJ, Nahar, N, Khan, R, Rahman, M, Podder, G, Nahar, K, Khan, D, Gurley, ES, Rollin, PE, Comer, JA, Ksiazek, T & Luby, SP 2010, 'Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007', PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 10, e13570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013570
Homaira N, Rahman M, Hossain MJ, Nahar N, Khan R, Rahman M et al. Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007. PLoS One. 2010;5(10). e13570. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013570
Homaira, Nusrat ; Rahman, Mahmudur ; Hossain, M. Jahangir ; Nahar, Nazmun ; Khan, Rasheda ; Rahman, Mostafizur ; Podder, Goutam ; Nahar, Kamrun ; Khan, Dawlat ; Gurley, Emily S. ; Rollin, Pierre E. ; Comer, James A. ; Ksiazek, Thomas ; Luby, Stephen P. / Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007. In: PLoS One. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 10.
@article{98f11b7cf5dd4c7cb7bb2956c707c405,
title = "Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007",
abstract = "Objective: In March 2007, we investigated a cluster of Nipah encephalitis to identify risk factors for Nipah infection in Bangladesh. Methods: We defined confirmed Nipah cases by the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus in serum. Casepatients, who resided in the same village during the outbreak period but died before serum could be collected, were classified as probable cases. Results: We identified three confirmed and five probable Nipah cases. There was a single index case. Five of the secondary cases came in close physical contact to the index case when she was ill. Case-patients were more likely to have physical contact with the index case (71{\%} cases versus 0{\%} controls, p=<0.001). The index case, on her third day of illness, and all the subsequent cases attended the same religious gathering. For three probable cases including the index case, we could not identify any known risk factors for Nipah infection such as physical contact with Nipah case-patients, consumption of raw date palm juice, or contact with sick animals or fruit bats. Conclusion: Though person-to-person transmission remains an important mode of transmission for Nipah infection, we could not confirm the source of infection for three of the probable Nipah case-patients. Continued surveillance and outbreak investigations will help better understand the transmission of Nipah virus and develop preventive strategies.",
author = "Nusrat Homaira and Mahmudur Rahman and Hossain, {M. Jahangir} and Nazmun Nahar and Rasheda Khan and Mostafizur Rahman and Goutam Podder and Kamrun Nahar and Dawlat Khan and Gurley, {Emily S.} and Rollin, {Pierre E.} and Comer, {James A.} and Thomas Ksiazek and Luby, {Stephen P.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0013570",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cluster of nipah virus infection, kushtia district, Bangladesh, 2007

AU - Homaira, Nusrat

AU - Rahman, Mahmudur

AU - Hossain, M. Jahangir

AU - Nahar, Nazmun

AU - Khan, Rasheda

AU - Rahman, Mostafizur

AU - Podder, Goutam

AU - Nahar, Kamrun

AU - Khan, Dawlat

AU - Gurley, Emily S.

AU - Rollin, Pierre E.

AU - Comer, James A.

AU - Ksiazek, Thomas

AU - Luby, Stephen P.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objective: In March 2007, we investigated a cluster of Nipah encephalitis to identify risk factors for Nipah infection in Bangladesh. Methods: We defined confirmed Nipah cases by the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus in serum. Casepatients, who resided in the same village during the outbreak period but died before serum could be collected, were classified as probable cases. Results: We identified three confirmed and five probable Nipah cases. There was a single index case. Five of the secondary cases came in close physical contact to the index case when she was ill. Case-patients were more likely to have physical contact with the index case (71% cases versus 0% controls, p=<0.001). The index case, on her third day of illness, and all the subsequent cases attended the same religious gathering. For three probable cases including the index case, we could not identify any known risk factors for Nipah infection such as physical contact with Nipah case-patients, consumption of raw date palm juice, or contact with sick animals or fruit bats. Conclusion: Though person-to-person transmission remains an important mode of transmission for Nipah infection, we could not confirm the source of infection for three of the probable Nipah case-patients. Continued surveillance and outbreak investigations will help better understand the transmission of Nipah virus and develop preventive strategies.

AB - Objective: In March 2007, we investigated a cluster of Nipah encephalitis to identify risk factors for Nipah infection in Bangladesh. Methods: We defined confirmed Nipah cases by the presence of IgM and IgG antibodies against Nipah virus in serum. Casepatients, who resided in the same village during the outbreak period but died before serum could be collected, were classified as probable cases. Results: We identified three confirmed and five probable Nipah cases. There was a single index case. Five of the secondary cases came in close physical contact to the index case when she was ill. Case-patients were more likely to have physical contact with the index case (71% cases versus 0% controls, p=<0.001). The index case, on her third day of illness, and all the subsequent cases attended the same religious gathering. For three probable cases including the index case, we could not identify any known risk factors for Nipah infection such as physical contact with Nipah case-patients, consumption of raw date palm juice, or contact with sick animals or fruit bats. Conclusion: Though person-to-person transmission remains an important mode of transmission for Nipah infection, we could not confirm the source of infection for three of the probable Nipah case-patients. Continued surveillance and outbreak investigations will help better understand the transmission of Nipah virus and develop preventive strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78149430469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78149430469&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013570

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0013570

M3 - Article

C2 - 21042407

AN - SCOPUS:78149430469

VL - 5

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 10

M1 - e13570

ER -