Coagulation profile changes and safety of epidural analgesia after hepatectomy: a retrospective study

Kelly G. Elterman, Zhiling Xiong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to review post-hepatectomy coagulation profile changes, to assess outcomes of epidural catheter placement in post-hepatectomy patients, and to make justifications regarding use of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 141 patients undergoing liver resection at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. All patients were between 21 and 85 years old, with ASA physical status classification of II or III, and Child-Pugh scores ≤6. Patients undergoing laparoscopy or resection of less than three hepatic segments were excluded. We examined pre-operative hematocrit, platelet count, coagulation studies, and liver function tests, and trended values for 7 post-operative days. We examined frequency of epidural placement, use of peri-operative anticoagulation, and incidence of epidural-related complications. Results: We demonstrated statistically significant decreases in hematocrit and platelet counts, as well as statistically significant increases in prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (INR) values. Thirty-two percent of patients required vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma to achieve an INR ≤1.3. No patient required platelet transfusion to achieve platelets ≥100,000 prior to catheter removal. Changes in post-operative partial thromboplastin time were not significant. Epidural catheters were placed in 90 % of liver resections performed at our institution. We noted no epidural hematomas, even in the 7 % of patients in whom the epidural catheter was inadvertently removed before coagulation criteria were met. The latter group was monitored with hourly neurologic exams for 24 h. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia may be safely used in patients undergoing major hepatic resection, providing that they have normal pre-operative coagulation and catheters are removed only when resection-induced perioperative coagulopathy has resolved or has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-372
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Anesthesia
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 13 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidural Analgesia
Hepatectomy
Retrospective Studies
Safety
Catheters
International Normalized Ratio
Liver
Platelet Count
Hematocrit
Platelet Transfusion
Partial Thromboplastin Time
Vitamin K
Liver Function Tests
Prothrombin Time
Hematoma
Laparoscopy
Nervous System
Blood Platelets
Incidence

Keywords

  • Coagulopathy
  • Epidural anesthesia
  • Hepatectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Coagulation profile changes and safety of epidural analgesia after hepatectomy : a retrospective study. / Elterman, Kelly G.; Xiong, Zhiling.

In: Journal of Anesthesia, Vol. 29, No. 3, 13.11.2014, p. 367-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elterman, Kelly G. ; Xiong, Zhiling. / Coagulation profile changes and safety of epidural analgesia after hepatectomy : a retrospective study. In: Journal of Anesthesia. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 367-372.
@article{93fe65d11ff643b6b71c97d6be147c00,
title = "Coagulation profile changes and safety of epidural analgesia after hepatectomy: a retrospective study",
abstract = "Purpose: We aimed to review post-hepatectomy coagulation profile changes, to assess outcomes of epidural catheter placement in post-hepatectomy patients, and to make justifications regarding use of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 141 patients undergoing liver resection at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. All patients were between 21 and 85 years old, with ASA physical status classification of II or III, and Child-Pugh scores ≤6. Patients undergoing laparoscopy or resection of less than three hepatic segments were excluded. We examined pre-operative hematocrit, platelet count, coagulation studies, and liver function tests, and trended values for 7 post-operative days. We examined frequency of epidural placement, use of peri-operative anticoagulation, and incidence of epidural-related complications. Results: We demonstrated statistically significant decreases in hematocrit and platelet counts, as well as statistically significant increases in prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (INR) values. Thirty-two percent of patients required vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma to achieve an INR ≤1.3. No patient required platelet transfusion to achieve platelets ≥100,000 prior to catheter removal. Changes in post-operative partial thromboplastin time were not significant. Epidural catheters were placed in 90 {\%} of liver resections performed at our institution. We noted no epidural hematomas, even in the 7 {\%} of patients in whom the epidural catheter was inadvertently removed before coagulation criteria were met. The latter group was monitored with hourly neurologic exams for 24 h. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia may be safely used in patients undergoing major hepatic resection, providing that they have normal pre-operative coagulation and catheters are removed only when resection-induced perioperative coagulopathy has resolved or has been corrected.",
keywords = "Coagulopathy, Epidural anesthesia, Hepatectomy",
author = "Elterman, {Kelly G.} and Zhiling Xiong",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1007/s00540-014-1933-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "367--372",
journal = "Journal of Anesthesia",
issn = "0913-8668",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coagulation profile changes and safety of epidural analgesia after hepatectomy

T2 - a retrospective study

AU - Elterman, Kelly G.

AU - Xiong, Zhiling

PY - 2014/11/13

Y1 - 2014/11/13

N2 - Purpose: We aimed to review post-hepatectomy coagulation profile changes, to assess outcomes of epidural catheter placement in post-hepatectomy patients, and to make justifications regarding use of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 141 patients undergoing liver resection at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. All patients were between 21 and 85 years old, with ASA physical status classification of II or III, and Child-Pugh scores ≤6. Patients undergoing laparoscopy or resection of less than three hepatic segments were excluded. We examined pre-operative hematocrit, platelet count, coagulation studies, and liver function tests, and trended values for 7 post-operative days. We examined frequency of epidural placement, use of peri-operative anticoagulation, and incidence of epidural-related complications. Results: We demonstrated statistically significant decreases in hematocrit and platelet counts, as well as statistically significant increases in prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (INR) values. Thirty-two percent of patients required vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma to achieve an INR ≤1.3. No patient required platelet transfusion to achieve platelets ≥100,000 prior to catheter removal. Changes in post-operative partial thromboplastin time were not significant. Epidural catheters were placed in 90 % of liver resections performed at our institution. We noted no epidural hematomas, even in the 7 % of patients in whom the epidural catheter was inadvertently removed before coagulation criteria were met. The latter group was monitored with hourly neurologic exams for 24 h. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia may be safely used in patients undergoing major hepatic resection, providing that they have normal pre-operative coagulation and catheters are removed only when resection-induced perioperative coagulopathy has resolved or has been corrected.

AB - Purpose: We aimed to review post-hepatectomy coagulation profile changes, to assess outcomes of epidural catheter placement in post-hepatectomy patients, and to make justifications regarding use of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 141 patients undergoing liver resection at Brigham and Women’s Hospital between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2011. All patients were between 21 and 85 years old, with ASA physical status classification of II or III, and Child-Pugh scores ≤6. Patients undergoing laparoscopy or resection of less than three hepatic segments were excluded. We examined pre-operative hematocrit, platelet count, coagulation studies, and liver function tests, and trended values for 7 post-operative days. We examined frequency of epidural placement, use of peri-operative anticoagulation, and incidence of epidural-related complications. Results: We demonstrated statistically significant decreases in hematocrit and platelet counts, as well as statistically significant increases in prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (INR) values. Thirty-two percent of patients required vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma to achieve an INR ≤1.3. No patient required platelet transfusion to achieve platelets ≥100,000 prior to catheter removal. Changes in post-operative partial thromboplastin time were not significant. Epidural catheters were placed in 90 % of liver resections performed at our institution. We noted no epidural hematomas, even in the 7 % of patients in whom the epidural catheter was inadvertently removed before coagulation criteria were met. The latter group was monitored with hourly neurologic exams for 24 h. Conclusion: Epidural analgesia may be safely used in patients undergoing major hepatic resection, providing that they have normal pre-operative coagulation and catheters are removed only when resection-induced perioperative coagulopathy has resolved or has been corrected.

KW - Coagulopathy

KW - Epidural anesthesia

KW - Hepatectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934440335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934440335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00540-014-1933-4

DO - 10.1007/s00540-014-1933-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 25391365

AN - SCOPUS:84934440335

VL - 29

SP - 367

EP - 372

JO - Journal of Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Anesthesia

SN - 0913-8668

IS - 3

ER -