Cognitive and perceptual responses during passive heat stress in younger and older adults

Zachary J. Schlader, Daniel Gagnon, Amy Adams, Eric Rivas, C. Munro Cullum, Craig G. Crandall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that attention, memory, and executive function are impaired to a greater extent in passively heat-stressed older adults than in passively heatstressed younger adults. In a randomized, crossover design, 15 older (age: 69 ± 5 yr) and 14 younger (age: 30 ± 4 yr) healthy subjects underwent passive heat stress and time control trials. Cognitive tests (outcomes: accuracy and reaction time) from the CANTAB battery evaluated attention [rapid visual processing (RVP), choice reaction time (CRT)], memory [spatial span (SSP), pattern recognition memory (PRM)], and executive function [one touch stockings of Cambridge (OTS)]. Testing was undertaken on two occasions during each trial, at baseline and after internal temperature had increased by 1.0 ± 0.2°C or after a time control period. For tests that measured attention, reaction time during RVP and CRT was slower (P ≤ 0.01) in the older group. During heat stress, RVP reaction time improved (P < 0.01) in both groups. Heat stress had no effect (P ≥ 0.09) on RVP or CRT accuracy in either group. For tests that measured memory, accuracy on SSP and PRM was lower (P < 0.01) in the older group, but there was no effect of heat stress (P ≥ 0.14). For tests that measured executive function, overall, accuracy on OTS was lower, and reaction time was slower in the older group (P ≤ 0.05). Reaction time generally improved during heat stress, but there was no effect of heat stress on accuracy in either group. These data indicate that moderate increases in body temperature during passive heat stress do not differentially compromise cognitive function in younger and older adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)R847-R854
JournalAmerican Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Volume308
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 15 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Young Adult
Hot Temperature
Executive Function
Touch
Body Temperature
Cross-Over Studies
Cognition
Healthy Volunteers
Temperature

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Cognitive function
  • Hyperthermia
  • Thermal comfort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cognitive and perceptual responses during passive heat stress in younger and older adults. / Schlader, Zachary J.; Gagnon, Daniel; Adams, Amy; Rivas, Eric; Cullum, C. Munro; Crandall, Craig G.

In: American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Vol. 308, No. 10, 15.05.2015, p. R847-R854.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schlader, Zachary J. ; Gagnon, Daniel ; Adams, Amy ; Rivas, Eric ; Cullum, C. Munro ; Crandall, Craig G. / Cognitive and perceptual responses during passive heat stress in younger and older adults. In: American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2015 ; Vol. 308, No. 10. pp. R847-R854.
@article{7b6a0c2599044dbd92c18b3ee87409f1,
title = "Cognitive and perceptual responses during passive heat stress in younger and older adults",
abstract = "We tested the hypothesis that attention, memory, and executive function are impaired to a greater extent in passively heat-stressed older adults than in passively heatstressed younger adults. In a randomized, crossover design, 15 older (age: 69 ± 5 yr) and 14 younger (age: 30 ± 4 yr) healthy subjects underwent passive heat stress and time control trials. Cognitive tests (outcomes: accuracy and reaction time) from the CANTAB battery evaluated attention [rapid visual processing (RVP), choice reaction time (CRT)], memory [spatial span (SSP), pattern recognition memory (PRM)], and executive function [one touch stockings of Cambridge (OTS)]. Testing was undertaken on two occasions during each trial, at baseline and after internal temperature had increased by 1.0 ± 0.2°C or after a time control period. For tests that measured attention, reaction time during RVP and CRT was slower (P ≤ 0.01) in the older group. During heat stress, RVP reaction time improved (P < 0.01) in both groups. Heat stress had no effect (P ≥ 0.09) on RVP or CRT accuracy in either group. For tests that measured memory, accuracy on SSP and PRM was lower (P < 0.01) in the older group, but there was no effect of heat stress (P ≥ 0.14). For tests that measured executive function, overall, accuracy on OTS was lower, and reaction time was slower in the older group (P ≤ 0.05). Reaction time generally improved during heat stress, but there was no effect of heat stress on accuracy in either group. These data indicate that moderate increases in body temperature during passive heat stress do not differentially compromise cognitive function in younger and older adults.",
keywords = "Aging, Cognitive function, Hyperthermia, Thermal comfort",
author = "Schlader, {Zachary J.} and Daniel Gagnon and Amy Adams and Eric Rivas and Cullum, {C. Munro} and Crandall, {Craig G.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1152/ajpregu.00010.2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "308",
pages = "R847--R854",
journal = "American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0193-1849",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cognitive and perceptual responses during passive heat stress in younger and older adults

AU - Schlader, Zachary J.

AU - Gagnon, Daniel

AU - Adams, Amy

AU - Rivas, Eric

AU - Cullum, C. Munro

AU - Crandall, Craig G.

PY - 2015/5/15

Y1 - 2015/5/15

N2 - We tested the hypothesis that attention, memory, and executive function are impaired to a greater extent in passively heat-stressed older adults than in passively heatstressed younger adults. In a randomized, crossover design, 15 older (age: 69 ± 5 yr) and 14 younger (age: 30 ± 4 yr) healthy subjects underwent passive heat stress and time control trials. Cognitive tests (outcomes: accuracy and reaction time) from the CANTAB battery evaluated attention [rapid visual processing (RVP), choice reaction time (CRT)], memory [spatial span (SSP), pattern recognition memory (PRM)], and executive function [one touch stockings of Cambridge (OTS)]. Testing was undertaken on two occasions during each trial, at baseline and after internal temperature had increased by 1.0 ± 0.2°C or after a time control period. For tests that measured attention, reaction time during RVP and CRT was slower (P ≤ 0.01) in the older group. During heat stress, RVP reaction time improved (P < 0.01) in both groups. Heat stress had no effect (P ≥ 0.09) on RVP or CRT accuracy in either group. For tests that measured memory, accuracy on SSP and PRM was lower (P < 0.01) in the older group, but there was no effect of heat stress (P ≥ 0.14). For tests that measured executive function, overall, accuracy on OTS was lower, and reaction time was slower in the older group (P ≤ 0.05). Reaction time generally improved during heat stress, but there was no effect of heat stress on accuracy in either group. These data indicate that moderate increases in body temperature during passive heat stress do not differentially compromise cognitive function in younger and older adults.

AB - We tested the hypothesis that attention, memory, and executive function are impaired to a greater extent in passively heat-stressed older adults than in passively heatstressed younger adults. In a randomized, crossover design, 15 older (age: 69 ± 5 yr) and 14 younger (age: 30 ± 4 yr) healthy subjects underwent passive heat stress and time control trials. Cognitive tests (outcomes: accuracy and reaction time) from the CANTAB battery evaluated attention [rapid visual processing (RVP), choice reaction time (CRT)], memory [spatial span (SSP), pattern recognition memory (PRM)], and executive function [one touch stockings of Cambridge (OTS)]. Testing was undertaken on two occasions during each trial, at baseline and after internal temperature had increased by 1.0 ± 0.2°C or after a time control period. For tests that measured attention, reaction time during RVP and CRT was slower (P ≤ 0.01) in the older group. During heat stress, RVP reaction time improved (P < 0.01) in both groups. Heat stress had no effect (P ≥ 0.09) on RVP or CRT accuracy in either group. For tests that measured memory, accuracy on SSP and PRM was lower (P < 0.01) in the older group, but there was no effect of heat stress (P ≥ 0.14). For tests that measured executive function, overall, accuracy on OTS was lower, and reaction time was slower in the older group (P ≤ 0.05). Reaction time generally improved during heat stress, but there was no effect of heat stress on accuracy in either group. These data indicate that moderate increases in body temperature during passive heat stress do not differentially compromise cognitive function in younger and older adults.

KW - Aging

KW - Cognitive function

KW - Hyperthermia

KW - Thermal comfort

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930916345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930916345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1152/ajpregu.00010.2015

DO - 10.1152/ajpregu.00010.2015

M3 - Article

VL - 308

SP - R847-R854

JO - American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0193-1849

IS - 10

ER -