Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents

Suresh Bhavnani, Gavin Clarkson, Matthew Scholl

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the large number of patent searches conducted by professional patent searchers and inventors, little is known about how such searches are actually performed. Here we describe a qualitative study of experienced patent searchers as they conducted in-context searches at a technology transfer office. Based on studies of expert search and sensemaking in other domains, we expected the professional searchers to (1) use well-formed search strategies that were effective for patent search, and (2) rapidly make sense of the novelty of an invention by constructing new representations to organize existing patents that appear relevant. Instead, we observed the searchers perform simplistic preliminary searches and then exchange their search process and results with inventors and patent lawyers to collaboratively make sense of the patentability and licensability of the invention. Furthermore, their sensemaking consisted of selecting known representations of patents to organize the new information, an approach we call "weak" sensemaking. These results suggest implications for designing systems that support the observed collaborative "weak" sensemaking with the goal of helping the users to more effectively determine the patentability and licensability of an invention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
Pages2799-2804
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes
Event28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Florence, Italy
Duration: Apr 5 2008Apr 10 2008

Other

Other28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
CountryItaly
CityFlorence
Period4/5/084/10/08

Fingerprint

Patents and inventions
Technology transfer

Keywords

  • Interviews
  • Patent search
  • Qualitative study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Software

Cite this

Bhavnani, S., Clarkson, G., & Scholl, M. (2008). Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (pp. 2799-2804) https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358764

Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents. / Bhavnani, Suresh; Clarkson, Gavin; Scholl, Matthew.

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2008. p. 2799-2804.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Bhavnani, S, Clarkson, G & Scholl, M 2008, Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents. in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. pp. 2799-2804, 28th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy, 4/5/08. https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358764
Bhavnani S, Clarkson G, Scholl M. Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2008. p. 2799-2804 https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358764
Bhavnani, Suresh ; Clarkson, Gavin ; Scholl, Matthew. / Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 2008. pp. 2799-2804
@inproceedings{03de26a37e6b473c810ed77f456553b9,
title = "Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents",
abstract = "Despite the large number of patent searches conducted by professional patent searchers and inventors, little is known about how such searches are actually performed. Here we describe a qualitative study of experienced patent searchers as they conducted in-context searches at a technology transfer office. Based on studies of expert search and sensemaking in other domains, we expected the professional searchers to (1) use well-formed search strategies that were effective for patent search, and (2) rapidly make sense of the novelty of an invention by constructing new representations to organize existing patents that appear relevant. Instead, we observed the searchers perform simplistic preliminary searches and then exchange their search process and results with inventors and patent lawyers to collaboratively make sense of the patentability and licensability of the invention. Furthermore, their sensemaking consisted of selecting known representations of patents to organize the new information, an approach we call {"}weak{"} sensemaking. These results suggest implications for designing systems that support the observed collaborative {"}weak{"} sensemaking with the goal of helping the users to more effectively determine the patentability and licensability of an invention.",
keywords = "Interviews, Patent search, Qualitative study",
author = "Suresh Bhavnani and Gavin Clarkson and Matthew Scholl",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1145/1358628.1358764",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "2799--2804",
booktitle = "Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Collaborative search and sensemaking of patents

AU - Bhavnani, Suresh

AU - Clarkson, Gavin

AU - Scholl, Matthew

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Despite the large number of patent searches conducted by professional patent searchers and inventors, little is known about how such searches are actually performed. Here we describe a qualitative study of experienced patent searchers as they conducted in-context searches at a technology transfer office. Based on studies of expert search and sensemaking in other domains, we expected the professional searchers to (1) use well-formed search strategies that were effective for patent search, and (2) rapidly make sense of the novelty of an invention by constructing new representations to organize existing patents that appear relevant. Instead, we observed the searchers perform simplistic preliminary searches and then exchange their search process and results with inventors and patent lawyers to collaboratively make sense of the patentability and licensability of the invention. Furthermore, their sensemaking consisted of selecting known representations of patents to organize the new information, an approach we call "weak" sensemaking. These results suggest implications for designing systems that support the observed collaborative "weak" sensemaking with the goal of helping the users to more effectively determine the patentability and licensability of an invention.

AB - Despite the large number of patent searches conducted by professional patent searchers and inventors, little is known about how such searches are actually performed. Here we describe a qualitative study of experienced patent searchers as they conducted in-context searches at a technology transfer office. Based on studies of expert search and sensemaking in other domains, we expected the professional searchers to (1) use well-formed search strategies that were effective for patent search, and (2) rapidly make sense of the novelty of an invention by constructing new representations to organize existing patents that appear relevant. Instead, we observed the searchers perform simplistic preliminary searches and then exchange their search process and results with inventors and patent lawyers to collaboratively make sense of the patentability and licensability of the invention. Furthermore, their sensemaking consisted of selecting known representations of patents to organize the new information, an approach we call "weak" sensemaking. These results suggest implications for designing systems that support the observed collaborative "weak" sensemaking with the goal of helping the users to more effectively determine the patentability and licensability of an invention.

KW - Interviews

KW - Patent search

KW - Qualitative study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049176573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049176573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/1358628.1358764

DO - 10.1145/1358628.1358764

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:57049176573

SP - 2799

EP - 2804

BT - Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

ER -