Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity

A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome

Paul Latimer, Sushil Sarna, Dugal Campbell, Margaret Latimer, William Waterfall, E. E. Daniel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

164 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Colonic electrical control activity and colonic motor activity in patients with IBS were compared to that found in patients who were equally psychologically disturbed but without bowel symptoms and to the colonic activity of normal subjects. A psychologic assessment was followed by measurement of activity in the rectosigmoid colon during baseline, a neutral interview, a stressful interview, and after a meal or neostigmine. Myoelectrical activity was recorded from two intraluminal bipolar suction electrodes; motor activity was recorded from two intaluminal strain gauges at the same sites. The number and duration of contractions per minute were determined by inspection of the motor activity record; the frequency content of both the motor and myoelectrical records was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform method. Patient selection was successful in producing two groups psychologically similar to each other and more disturbed than the normals. The IBS group had a greater number and duration of contractions than the normals at one recording site during baseline; there were no differences in electrical control (slow wave) activity between these same two groups. The IBS group did not differ significantly from the neurotic group on measures of either electrical control activity or motor activity. Possible reasons for the discrepancies between this and some previous studies are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)893-901
Number of pages9
JournalGastroenterology
Volume80
Issue number5 PART 1
StatePublished - 1981
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Motor Activity
Interviews
Neostigmine
Suction
Fourier Analysis
Patient Selection
Meals
Electrodes
Colon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Latimer, P., Sarna, S., Campbell, D., Latimer, M., Waterfall, W., & Daniel, E. E. (1981). Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity: A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology, 80(5 PART 1), 893-901.

Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity : A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. / Latimer, Paul; Sarna, Sushil; Campbell, Dugal; Latimer, Margaret; Waterfall, William; Daniel, E. E.

In: Gastroenterology, Vol. 80, No. 5 PART 1, 1981, p. 893-901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Latimer, P, Sarna, S, Campbell, D, Latimer, M, Waterfall, W & Daniel, EE 1981, 'Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity: A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome', Gastroenterology, vol. 80, no. 5 PART 1, pp. 893-901.
Latimer, Paul ; Sarna, Sushil ; Campbell, Dugal ; Latimer, Margaret ; Waterfall, William ; Daniel, E. E. / Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity : A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome. In: Gastroenterology. 1981 ; Vol. 80, No. 5 PART 1. pp. 893-901.
@article{97127981e1f4467ab93d8503651d9c02,
title = "Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity: A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome",
abstract = "Colonic electrical control activity and colonic motor activity in patients with IBS were compared to that found in patients who were equally psychologically disturbed but without bowel symptoms and to the colonic activity of normal subjects. A psychologic assessment was followed by measurement of activity in the rectosigmoid colon during baseline, a neutral interview, a stressful interview, and after a meal or neostigmine. Myoelectrical activity was recorded from two intraluminal bipolar suction electrodes; motor activity was recorded from two intaluminal strain gauges at the same sites. The number and duration of contractions per minute were determined by inspection of the motor activity record; the frequency content of both the motor and myoelectrical records was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform method. Patient selection was successful in producing two groups psychologically similar to each other and more disturbed than the normals. The IBS group had a greater number and duration of contractions than the normals at one recording site during baseline; there were no differences in electrical control (slow wave) activity between these same two groups. The IBS group did not differ significantly from the neurotic group on measures of either electrical control activity or motor activity. Possible reasons for the discrepancies between this and some previous studies are discussed.",
author = "Paul Latimer and Sushil Sarna and Dugal Campbell and Margaret Latimer and William Waterfall and Daniel, {E. E.}",
year = "1981",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "893--901",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonic motor and myoelectrical activity

T2 - A comparative study of normal subjects, psychoneurotic patients, and patients with irritable bowel syndrome

AU - Latimer, Paul

AU - Sarna, Sushil

AU - Campbell, Dugal

AU - Latimer, Margaret

AU - Waterfall, William

AU - Daniel, E. E.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - Colonic electrical control activity and colonic motor activity in patients with IBS were compared to that found in patients who were equally psychologically disturbed but without bowel symptoms and to the colonic activity of normal subjects. A psychologic assessment was followed by measurement of activity in the rectosigmoid colon during baseline, a neutral interview, a stressful interview, and after a meal or neostigmine. Myoelectrical activity was recorded from two intraluminal bipolar suction electrodes; motor activity was recorded from two intaluminal strain gauges at the same sites. The number and duration of contractions per minute were determined by inspection of the motor activity record; the frequency content of both the motor and myoelectrical records was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform method. Patient selection was successful in producing two groups psychologically similar to each other and more disturbed than the normals. The IBS group had a greater number and duration of contractions than the normals at one recording site during baseline; there were no differences in electrical control (slow wave) activity between these same two groups. The IBS group did not differ significantly from the neurotic group on measures of either electrical control activity or motor activity. Possible reasons for the discrepancies between this and some previous studies are discussed.

AB - Colonic electrical control activity and colonic motor activity in patients with IBS were compared to that found in patients who were equally psychologically disturbed but without bowel symptoms and to the colonic activity of normal subjects. A psychologic assessment was followed by measurement of activity in the rectosigmoid colon during baseline, a neutral interview, a stressful interview, and after a meal or neostigmine. Myoelectrical activity was recorded from two intraluminal bipolar suction electrodes; motor activity was recorded from two intaluminal strain gauges at the same sites. The number and duration of contractions per minute were determined by inspection of the motor activity record; the frequency content of both the motor and myoelectrical records was determined using the Fast Fourier Transform method. Patient selection was successful in producing two groups psychologically similar to each other and more disturbed than the normals. The IBS group had a greater number and duration of contractions than the normals at one recording site during baseline; there were no differences in electrical control (slow wave) activity between these same two groups. The IBS group did not differ significantly from the neurotic group on measures of either electrical control activity or motor activity. Possible reasons for the discrepancies between this and some previous studies are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019461618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019461618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 893

EP - 901

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 5 PART 1

ER -