Analgesia combinada epidural-intradural para el trabajo de parto

Una revisión bibliográfica sistemática cuantitativa (metaanálisis)

Translated title of the contribution: Combined epidural-spinal analgesia during labor: A quantitative systematic review of the literature (meta-analysis)

Francisco Pascual-Ramirez, J. Haya Palazuelo, J. M. Valverde Mantecón

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To perform a meta-analysis on the use of combined epidural-intrathecal analgesia during labor, including intrathecal fentanyl and/or morphine compared to usual epidural techniques. Material and method: A literature search was made looking for randomized clinical trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The size of the effect for quantitative variables was analyzed by weighted mean difference; for qualitative variables, by odds ratio. Variables analyzed were: labor duration, type of delivery (spontaneous, instrumental and caesarean section), motor blockade, pain, and satisfaction. The analysis used in most cases was a random effects model. Results: A total of 21 trials, which included 3.646 patients, were selected out of the 38 initially found. The type of delivery variable with its 3 subgroups was the only one to show uniformity (p>Q 0.1; I2<50%). There were no differences in the variables analyzed except pain, which was advantageous for the group with intrathecal fentanyl or morphine by 0.55 points out of 10. Conclusion: Combined analgesia including intrathecal fentanyl-morphine does not offer significant advantages compared to the standard epidural.

Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)489-497
Number of pages9
JournalRevista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion
Volume60
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidural Analgesia
Fentanyl
Morphine
Meta-Analysis
Pain
MEDLINE
Cesarean Section
Analgesia
Libraries
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Combined analgesia
  • Epidural analgesia
  • Intrathecal opiates
  • Labor analgesia
  • Meta-analysis
  • Neuraxial analgesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Analgesia combinada epidural-intradural para el trabajo de parto : Una revisión bibliográfica sistemática cuantitativa (metaanálisis). / Pascual-Ramirez, Francisco; Haya Palazuelo, J.; Valverde Mantecón, J. M.

In: Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion, Vol. 60, No. 9, 01.11.2013, p. 489-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{40679e286eae405e921c3c69451df7a4,
title = "Analgesia combinada epidural-intradural para el trabajo de parto: Una revisi{\'o}n bibliogr{\'a}fica sistem{\'a}tica cuantitativa (metaan{\'a}lisis)",
abstract = "Objective: To perform a meta-analysis on the use of combined epidural-intrathecal analgesia during labor, including intrathecal fentanyl and/or morphine compared to usual epidural techniques. Material and method: A literature search was made looking for randomized clinical trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The size of the effect for quantitative variables was analyzed by weighted mean difference; for qualitative variables, by odds ratio. Variables analyzed were: labor duration, type of delivery (spontaneous, instrumental and caesarean section), motor blockade, pain, and satisfaction. The analysis used in most cases was a random effects model. Results: A total of 21 trials, which included 3.646 patients, were selected out of the 38 initially found. The type of delivery variable with its 3 subgroups was the only one to show uniformity (p>Q 0.1; I2<50{\%}). There were no differences in the variables analyzed except pain, which was advantageous for the group with intrathecal fentanyl or morphine by 0.55 points out of 10. Conclusion: Combined analgesia including intrathecal fentanyl-morphine does not offer significant advantages compared to the standard epidural.",
keywords = "Combined analgesia, Epidural analgesia, Intrathecal opiates, Labor analgesia, Meta-analysis, Neuraxial analgesia",
author = "Francisco Pascual-Ramirez and {Haya Palazuelo}, J. and {Valverde Mantec{\'o}n}, {J. M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.redar.2013.04.015",
language = "Spanish",
volume = "60",
pages = "489--497",
journal = "Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion",
issn = "0034-9356",
publisher = "Ediciones Doyma, S.L.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analgesia combinada epidural-intradural para el trabajo de parto

T2 - Una revisión bibliográfica sistemática cuantitativa (metaanálisis)

AU - Pascual-Ramirez, Francisco

AU - Haya Palazuelo, J.

AU - Valverde Mantecón, J. M.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Objective: To perform a meta-analysis on the use of combined epidural-intrathecal analgesia during labor, including intrathecal fentanyl and/or morphine compared to usual epidural techniques. Material and method: A literature search was made looking for randomized clinical trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The size of the effect for quantitative variables was analyzed by weighted mean difference; for qualitative variables, by odds ratio. Variables analyzed were: labor duration, type of delivery (spontaneous, instrumental and caesarean section), motor blockade, pain, and satisfaction. The analysis used in most cases was a random effects model. Results: A total of 21 trials, which included 3.646 patients, were selected out of the 38 initially found. The type of delivery variable with its 3 subgroups was the only one to show uniformity (p>Q 0.1; I2<50%). There were no differences in the variables analyzed except pain, which was advantageous for the group with intrathecal fentanyl or morphine by 0.55 points out of 10. Conclusion: Combined analgesia including intrathecal fentanyl-morphine does not offer significant advantages compared to the standard epidural.

AB - Objective: To perform a meta-analysis on the use of combined epidural-intrathecal analgesia during labor, including intrathecal fentanyl and/or morphine compared to usual epidural techniques. Material and method: A literature search was made looking for randomized clinical trials in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. The size of the effect for quantitative variables was analyzed by weighted mean difference; for qualitative variables, by odds ratio. Variables analyzed were: labor duration, type of delivery (spontaneous, instrumental and caesarean section), motor blockade, pain, and satisfaction. The analysis used in most cases was a random effects model. Results: A total of 21 trials, which included 3.646 patients, were selected out of the 38 initially found. The type of delivery variable with its 3 subgroups was the only one to show uniformity (p>Q 0.1; I2<50%). There were no differences in the variables analyzed except pain, which was advantageous for the group with intrathecal fentanyl or morphine by 0.55 points out of 10. Conclusion: Combined analgesia including intrathecal fentanyl-morphine does not offer significant advantages compared to the standard epidural.

KW - Combined analgesia

KW - Epidural analgesia

KW - Intrathecal opiates

KW - Labor analgesia

KW - Meta-analysis

KW - Neuraxial analgesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887818402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887818402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.redar.2013.04.015

DO - 10.1016/j.redar.2013.04.015

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 489

EP - 497

JO - Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion

JF - Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia y Reanimacion

SN - 0034-9356

IS - 9

ER -