Commentary on the paper by Benes and Lange

Richard E. Coggeshall

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In disagreement with Benes and Lange, non-randomness of the nervous system does not preclude stereological methods in general or the optical disector in particular. In agreement with Benes and Lange, sampling in histological material is non-trivial. Also in agreement with Benes and Lange, there might be occasions where 2-D methods would be useful, but all requirements of these methods must be met, and as a final comment, this might be more time-consuming than a stereological estimate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)376-377
Number of pages2
JournalTrends in Neurosciences
Volume24
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on the paper by Benes and Lange'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this