Commentary on the paper by Benes and Lange

Richard E. Coggeshall

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

    7 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In disagreement with Benes and Lange, non-randomness of the nervous system does not preclude stereological methods in general or the optical disector in particular. In agreement with Benes and Lange, sampling in histological material is non-trivial. Also in agreement with Benes and Lange, there might be occasions where 2-D methods would be useful, but all requirements of these methods must be met, and as a final comment, this might be more time-consuming than a stereological estimate.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)376-377
    Number of pages2
    JournalTrends in Neurosciences
    Volume24
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2001

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Neuroscience

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Commentary on the paper by Benes and Lange'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this