Community alternatives to incarceration

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Introduction The central reason behind the creation of the juvenile justice system at the beginning of the twentieth century was the belief, that in contrast to adult offenders, delinquents were amenable to change in their antisocial behaviors. Therefore, the juvenile courts sought to capitalize on this opportunity and provide rehabilitation, not solely punishment. The rate of recidivism among young offenders certainly supports the notion of developing programs aimed at reforming delinquents (Snyder, 1988). The reduction in youth crime and its personal and economic costs to the individual and communities easily justify the expense of intervention (Schoenwald et al., 1996). In addition, it has been estimated that each delinquent that continues onto an adult criminal career costs society $1.3-1.5 million (Cohen, 1998). The founding principle of the opportunity for rehabilitation has been questioned from the start as to whether effective interventions truly exist with juvenile delinquents. Early intervention efforts were based on an individualized approach to meeting the needs of the particular youth before the court. While some intervention models were based on theoretical speculations regarding the causes of delinquency, few were derived from direct research on the causes and correlates of antisocial behavior in youth. Most reflected an application of general models of psychopathology and treatment to the special case of delinquency, such as Aichhorn’s psychoanalytic approach (Aichhorn, 1935). A series of research reviews in the late 1970s supported the popular belief that “nothing works” with delinquents (Lipton et al., 1975; Greenberg, 1977; Romig, 1978; Sechrest et al., 1979).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages368-384
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9780511543913, 9780521612906
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Costs and Cost Analysis
Punishment
Social Justice
Crime
Psychopathology
Research
Economics
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Thomas, C. (2007). Community alternatives to incarceration. In The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation (pp. 368-384). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543913.018

Community alternatives to incarceration. / Thomas, Christopher.

The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 368-384.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Thomas, C 2007, Community alternatives to incarceration. in The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543913.018
Thomas C. Community alternatives to incarceration. In The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 368-384 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511543913.018
Thomas, Christopher. / Community alternatives to incarceration. The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 368-384
@inbook{a13f6b1a99bb43a584722921ee419389,
title = "Community alternatives to incarceration",
abstract = "Introduction The central reason behind the creation of the juvenile justice system at the beginning of the twentieth century was the belief, that in contrast to adult offenders, delinquents were amenable to change in their antisocial behaviors. Therefore, the juvenile courts sought to capitalize on this opportunity and provide rehabilitation, not solely punishment. The rate of recidivism among young offenders certainly supports the notion of developing programs aimed at reforming delinquents (Snyder, 1988). The reduction in youth crime and its personal and economic costs to the individual and communities easily justify the expense of intervention (Schoenwald et al., 1996). In addition, it has been estimated that each delinquent that continues onto an adult criminal career costs society $1.3-1.5 million (Cohen, 1998). The founding principle of the opportunity for rehabilitation has been questioned from the start as to whether effective interventions truly exist with juvenile delinquents. Early intervention efforts were based on an individualized approach to meeting the needs of the particular youth before the court. While some intervention models were based on theoretical speculations regarding the causes of delinquency, few were derived from direct research on the causes and correlates of antisocial behavior in youth. Most reflected an application of general models of psychopathology and treatment to the special case of delinquency, such as Aichhorn’s psychoanalytic approach (Aichhorn, 1935). A series of research reviews in the late 1970s supported the popular belief that “nothing works” with delinquents (Lipton et al., 1975; Greenberg, 1977; Romig, 1978; Sechrest et al., 1979).",
author = "Christopher Thomas",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511543913.018",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511543913",
pages = "368--384",
booktitle = "The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Community alternatives to incarceration

AU - Thomas, Christopher

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Introduction The central reason behind the creation of the juvenile justice system at the beginning of the twentieth century was the belief, that in contrast to adult offenders, delinquents were amenable to change in their antisocial behaviors. Therefore, the juvenile courts sought to capitalize on this opportunity and provide rehabilitation, not solely punishment. The rate of recidivism among young offenders certainly supports the notion of developing programs aimed at reforming delinquents (Snyder, 1988). The reduction in youth crime and its personal and economic costs to the individual and communities easily justify the expense of intervention (Schoenwald et al., 1996). In addition, it has been estimated that each delinquent that continues onto an adult criminal career costs society $1.3-1.5 million (Cohen, 1998). The founding principle of the opportunity for rehabilitation has been questioned from the start as to whether effective interventions truly exist with juvenile delinquents. Early intervention efforts were based on an individualized approach to meeting the needs of the particular youth before the court. While some intervention models were based on theoretical speculations regarding the causes of delinquency, few were derived from direct research on the causes and correlates of antisocial behavior in youth. Most reflected an application of general models of psychopathology and treatment to the special case of delinquency, such as Aichhorn’s psychoanalytic approach (Aichhorn, 1935). A series of research reviews in the late 1970s supported the popular belief that “nothing works” with delinquents (Lipton et al., 1975; Greenberg, 1977; Romig, 1978; Sechrest et al., 1979).

AB - Introduction The central reason behind the creation of the juvenile justice system at the beginning of the twentieth century was the belief, that in contrast to adult offenders, delinquents were amenable to change in their antisocial behaviors. Therefore, the juvenile courts sought to capitalize on this opportunity and provide rehabilitation, not solely punishment. The rate of recidivism among young offenders certainly supports the notion of developing programs aimed at reforming delinquents (Snyder, 1988). The reduction in youth crime and its personal and economic costs to the individual and communities easily justify the expense of intervention (Schoenwald et al., 1996). In addition, it has been estimated that each delinquent that continues onto an adult criminal career costs society $1.3-1.5 million (Cohen, 1998). The founding principle of the opportunity for rehabilitation has been questioned from the start as to whether effective interventions truly exist with juvenile delinquents. Early intervention efforts were based on an individualized approach to meeting the needs of the particular youth before the court. While some intervention models were based on theoretical speculations regarding the causes of delinquency, few were derived from direct research on the causes and correlates of antisocial behavior in youth. Most reflected an application of general models of psychopathology and treatment to the special case of delinquency, such as Aichhorn’s psychoanalytic approach (Aichhorn, 1935). A series of research reviews in the late 1970s supported the popular belief that “nothing works” with delinquents (Lipton et al., 1975; Greenberg, 1977; Romig, 1978; Sechrest et al., 1979).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927032173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927032173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511543913.018

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511543913.018

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511543913

SN - 9780521612906

SP - 368

EP - 384

BT - The Mental Health Needs of Young Offenders: Forging Paths Toward Reintegration and Rehabilitation

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -