Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research

Yvonne A. Joosten, Tiffany L. Israel, Neely A. Williams, Leslie R. Boone, David G. Schlundt, Charles Mouton, Robert S. Dittus, Gordon R. Bernard, Consuelo H. Wilkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Problem Engaging communities in research increases its relevance and may speed the translation of discoveries into improved health outcomes. Many researchers lack training to effectively engage stakeholders, whereas academic institutions lack infrastructure to support community engagement. Approach In 2009, the Meharry-Vanderbilt Community-Engaged Research Core began testing new approaches for community engagement, which led to the development of the Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio). This structured program facilitates project-specific input from community and patient stakeholders to enhance research design, implementation, and dissemination. Developers used a team approach to recruit and train stakeholders, prepare researchers to engage with stakeholders, and facilitate an in-person meeting with both. Outcomes The research core has implemented 28 CE Studios that engaged 152 community stakeholders. Participating researchers, representing a broad range of faculty ranks and disciplines, reported that input from stakeholders was valuable and that the CE Studio helped determine project feasibility and enhanced research design and implementation. Stakeholders found the CE Studio to be an acceptable method of engagement and reported a better understanding of research in general. A tool kit was developed to replicate this model and to disseminate this approach. Next Steps The research core will collect data to better understand the impact of CE Studios on research proposal submissions, funding, research outcomes, patient and stakeholder engagement in projects, and dissemination of results. They will also collect data to determine whether CE Studios increase patient-centered approaches in research and whether stakeholders who participate have more trust and willingness to participate in research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1646-1650
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume90
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stakeholder
Research
community
Research Design
Research Personnel
research planning
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
research implementation
Patient Participation
community research
lack
funding
infrastructure
human being
Health
health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Joosten, Y. A., Israel, T. L., Williams, N. A., Boone, L. R., Schlundt, D. G., Mouton, C., ... Wilkins, C. H. (2015). Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research. Academic Medicine, 90(12), 1646-1650. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000794

Community Engagement Studios : A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research. / Joosten, Yvonne A.; Israel, Tiffany L.; Williams, Neely A.; Boone, Leslie R.; Schlundt, David G.; Mouton, Charles; Dittus, Robert S.; Bernard, Gordon R.; Wilkins, Consuelo H.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 90, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 1646-1650.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joosten, YA, Israel, TL, Williams, NA, Boone, LR, Schlundt, DG, Mouton, C, Dittus, RS, Bernard, GR & Wilkins, CH 2015, 'Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research', Academic Medicine, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1646-1650. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000794
Joosten, Yvonne A. ; Israel, Tiffany L. ; Williams, Neely A. ; Boone, Leslie R. ; Schlundt, David G. ; Mouton, Charles ; Dittus, Robert S. ; Bernard, Gordon R. ; Wilkins, Consuelo H. / Community Engagement Studios : A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research. In: Academic Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 90, No. 12. pp. 1646-1650.
@article{3797fade13024f30b7203cc7ed523f54,
title = "Community Engagement Studios: A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research",
abstract = "Problem Engaging communities in research increases its relevance and may speed the translation of discoveries into improved health outcomes. Many researchers lack training to effectively engage stakeholders, whereas academic institutions lack infrastructure to support community engagement. Approach In 2009, the Meharry-Vanderbilt Community-Engaged Research Core began testing new approaches for community engagement, which led to the development of the Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio). This structured program facilitates project-specific input from community and patient stakeholders to enhance research design, implementation, and dissemination. Developers used a team approach to recruit and train stakeholders, prepare researchers to engage with stakeholders, and facilitate an in-person meeting with both. Outcomes The research core has implemented 28 CE Studios that engaged 152 community stakeholders. Participating researchers, representing a broad range of faculty ranks and disciplines, reported that input from stakeholders was valuable and that the CE Studio helped determine project feasibility and enhanced research design and implementation. Stakeholders found the CE Studio to be an acceptable method of engagement and reported a better understanding of research in general. A tool kit was developed to replicate this model and to disseminate this approach. Next Steps The research core will collect data to better understand the impact of CE Studios on research proposal submissions, funding, research outcomes, patient and stakeholder engagement in projects, and dissemination of results. They will also collect data to determine whether CE Studios increase patient-centered approaches in research and whether stakeholders who participate have more trust and willingness to participate in research.",
author = "Joosten, {Yvonne A.} and Israel, {Tiffany L.} and Williams, {Neely A.} and Boone, {Leslie R.} and Schlundt, {David G.} and Charles Mouton and Dittus, {Robert S.} and Bernard, {Gordon R.} and Wilkins, {Consuelo H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000794",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1646--1650",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community Engagement Studios

T2 - A Structured Approach to Obtaining Meaningful Input from Stakeholders to Inform Research

AU - Joosten, Yvonne A.

AU - Israel, Tiffany L.

AU - Williams, Neely A.

AU - Boone, Leslie R.

AU - Schlundt, David G.

AU - Mouton, Charles

AU - Dittus, Robert S.

AU - Bernard, Gordon R.

AU - Wilkins, Consuelo H.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Problem Engaging communities in research increases its relevance and may speed the translation of discoveries into improved health outcomes. Many researchers lack training to effectively engage stakeholders, whereas academic institutions lack infrastructure to support community engagement. Approach In 2009, the Meharry-Vanderbilt Community-Engaged Research Core began testing new approaches for community engagement, which led to the development of the Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio). This structured program facilitates project-specific input from community and patient stakeholders to enhance research design, implementation, and dissemination. Developers used a team approach to recruit and train stakeholders, prepare researchers to engage with stakeholders, and facilitate an in-person meeting with both. Outcomes The research core has implemented 28 CE Studios that engaged 152 community stakeholders. Participating researchers, representing a broad range of faculty ranks and disciplines, reported that input from stakeholders was valuable and that the CE Studio helped determine project feasibility and enhanced research design and implementation. Stakeholders found the CE Studio to be an acceptable method of engagement and reported a better understanding of research in general. A tool kit was developed to replicate this model and to disseminate this approach. Next Steps The research core will collect data to better understand the impact of CE Studios on research proposal submissions, funding, research outcomes, patient and stakeholder engagement in projects, and dissemination of results. They will also collect data to determine whether CE Studios increase patient-centered approaches in research and whether stakeholders who participate have more trust and willingness to participate in research.

AB - Problem Engaging communities in research increases its relevance and may speed the translation of discoveries into improved health outcomes. Many researchers lack training to effectively engage stakeholders, whereas academic institutions lack infrastructure to support community engagement. Approach In 2009, the Meharry-Vanderbilt Community-Engaged Research Core began testing new approaches for community engagement, which led to the development of the Community Engagement Studio (CE Studio). This structured program facilitates project-specific input from community and patient stakeholders to enhance research design, implementation, and dissemination. Developers used a team approach to recruit and train stakeholders, prepare researchers to engage with stakeholders, and facilitate an in-person meeting with both. Outcomes The research core has implemented 28 CE Studios that engaged 152 community stakeholders. Participating researchers, representing a broad range of faculty ranks and disciplines, reported that input from stakeholders was valuable and that the CE Studio helped determine project feasibility and enhanced research design and implementation. Stakeholders found the CE Studio to be an acceptable method of engagement and reported a better understanding of research in general. A tool kit was developed to replicate this model and to disseminate this approach. Next Steps The research core will collect data to better understand the impact of CE Studios on research proposal submissions, funding, research outcomes, patient and stakeholder engagement in projects, and dissemination of results. They will also collect data to determine whether CE Studios increase patient-centered approaches in research and whether stakeholders who participate have more trust and willingness to participate in research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948133724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948133724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000794

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000794

M3 - Article

C2 - 26107879

AN - SCOPUS:84948133724

VL - 90

SP - 1646

EP - 1650

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 12

ER -