Comorbidities in head and neck cancer

Agreement between self-report and chart review

Shraddha S. Mukerji, Sonia A. Duffy, Karen E. Fowler, Mumtaz Khan, David L. Ronis, Jeffrey E. Terrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the accuracy of self-reported comorbidities compared with medical record review and the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with accuracy of self-reported comorbidities. Study Design: We conducted a prospective study of 458 newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients using self-administered questionnaire and medical chart review data. Overall and itemwise consistency between self-report and chart review was evaluated. Social, clinical, and demographic characteristics of consistent versus inconsistent responders were analyzed. Results: Seventy-four percent of patients had at least one comorbidity. There was good overall consistency between self-report and chart review (κ = 0.50). Compared with consistent responders, inconsistent responders were found to be older (P < 0.05), have lower sleep (P < 0.05) and physical activity scores (P < 0.05), be more depressed (P < 0.05), and have more severe comorbidities (P < 0.05). Conclusions and significance: Self-report may be considered as an alternative to chart review for comorbidity assessment in head and neck cancer patients. Younger patients, those with good general health, fewer depressive symptoms, and mild comorbidities, are more likely to give responses consistent with chart review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)536-542
Number of pages7
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume136
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Self Report
Comorbidity
Medical Records
Sleep
Demography
Prospective Studies
Exercise
Depression
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Mukerji, S. S., Duffy, S. A., Fowler, K. E., Khan, M., Ronis, D. L., & Terrell, J. E. (2007). Comorbidities in head and neck cancer: Agreement between self-report and chart review. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 136(4), 536-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.041

Comorbidities in head and neck cancer : Agreement between self-report and chart review. / Mukerji, Shraddha S.; Duffy, Sonia A.; Fowler, Karen E.; Khan, Mumtaz; Ronis, David L.; Terrell, Jeffrey E.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 136, No. 4, 04.2007, p. 536-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mukerji, Shraddha S. ; Duffy, Sonia A. ; Fowler, Karen E. ; Khan, Mumtaz ; Ronis, David L. ; Terrell, Jeffrey E. / Comorbidities in head and neck cancer : Agreement between self-report and chart review. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2007 ; Vol. 136, No. 4. pp. 536-542.
@article{469c8d715bcc4b879846328b548bc876,
title = "Comorbidities in head and neck cancer: Agreement between self-report and chart review",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the accuracy of self-reported comorbidities compared with medical record review and the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with accuracy of self-reported comorbidities. Study Design: We conducted a prospective study of 458 newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients using self-administered questionnaire and medical chart review data. Overall and itemwise consistency between self-report and chart review was evaluated. Social, clinical, and demographic characteristics of consistent versus inconsistent responders were analyzed. Results: Seventy-four percent of patients had at least one comorbidity. There was good overall consistency between self-report and chart review (κ = 0.50). Compared with consistent responders, inconsistent responders were found to be older (P < 0.05), have lower sleep (P < 0.05) and physical activity scores (P < 0.05), be more depressed (P < 0.05), and have more severe comorbidities (P < 0.05). Conclusions and significance: Self-report may be considered as an alternative to chart review for comorbidity assessment in head and neck cancer patients. Younger patients, those with good general health, fewer depressive symptoms, and mild comorbidities, are more likely to give responses consistent with chart review.",
author = "Mukerji, {Shraddha S.} and Duffy, {Sonia A.} and Fowler, {Karen E.} and Mumtaz Khan and Ronis, {David L.} and Terrell, {Jeffrey E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "536--542",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comorbidities in head and neck cancer

T2 - Agreement between self-report and chart review

AU - Mukerji, Shraddha S.

AU - Duffy, Sonia A.

AU - Fowler, Karen E.

AU - Khan, Mumtaz

AU - Ronis, David L.

AU - Terrell, Jeffrey E.

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Objectives: To determine the accuracy of self-reported comorbidities compared with medical record review and the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with accuracy of self-reported comorbidities. Study Design: We conducted a prospective study of 458 newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients using self-administered questionnaire and medical chart review data. Overall and itemwise consistency between self-report and chart review was evaluated. Social, clinical, and demographic characteristics of consistent versus inconsistent responders were analyzed. Results: Seventy-four percent of patients had at least one comorbidity. There was good overall consistency between self-report and chart review (κ = 0.50). Compared with consistent responders, inconsistent responders were found to be older (P < 0.05), have lower sleep (P < 0.05) and physical activity scores (P < 0.05), be more depressed (P < 0.05), and have more severe comorbidities (P < 0.05). Conclusions and significance: Self-report may be considered as an alternative to chart review for comorbidity assessment in head and neck cancer patients. Younger patients, those with good general health, fewer depressive symptoms, and mild comorbidities, are more likely to give responses consistent with chart review.

AB - Objectives: To determine the accuracy of self-reported comorbidities compared with medical record review and the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with accuracy of self-reported comorbidities. Study Design: We conducted a prospective study of 458 newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients using self-administered questionnaire and medical chart review data. Overall and itemwise consistency between self-report and chart review was evaluated. Social, clinical, and demographic characteristics of consistent versus inconsistent responders were analyzed. Results: Seventy-four percent of patients had at least one comorbidity. There was good overall consistency between self-report and chart review (κ = 0.50). Compared with consistent responders, inconsistent responders were found to be older (P < 0.05), have lower sleep (P < 0.05) and physical activity scores (P < 0.05), be more depressed (P < 0.05), and have more severe comorbidities (P < 0.05). Conclusions and significance: Self-report may be considered as an alternative to chart review for comorbidity assessment in head and neck cancer patients. Younger patients, those with good general health, fewer depressive symptoms, and mild comorbidities, are more likely to give responses consistent with chart review.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047157020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047157020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.041

DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.10.041

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 536

EP - 542

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 4

ER -