Comparative efficacy and safety of stent retrievers as a bailout strategy following failed contact aspiration technique in acute stroke thrombectomy

Mohamad Ezzeldin, Mishaal Hukamdad, Rahim Abo Kasem, Rime Ezzeldin, Ilko Maier, Ansaar T. Rai, Pascal Jabbour, Joon Tae Kim, Brian M. Howard, Ali Alawieh, Stacey Q. Wolfe, Robert M. Starke, Marios Nikos Psychogios, Amir Shaban, Nitin Goyal, Justin Dye, Ali Alaraj, Shinichi Yoshimura, David Fiorella, Omar TanweerDaniele G. Romano, Pedro Navia, Hugo Cuellar, Isabel Fragata, Adam Polifka, Justin R. Mascitelli, Joshua W. Osbun, Fazeel Siddiqui, Mark Moss, Kaustubh Limaye, Maxim Mokin, Charles Matouk, Min S. Park, Waleed Brinjikji, Ergun Daglioglu, Richard Williamson, David J. Altschul, Christopher S. Ogilvy, Roberto Javier Crosa, Michael R. Levitt, Benjamin Gory, Ramesh Grandhi, Alexandra R. Paul, Peter Kan, Walter Casagrande, Shakeel A. Chowdhry, Michael F. Stiefel, Varun Chaubal, Alejandro M. Spiotta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The contact aspiration (CA) technique is often used to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, rescue strategies are necessary if CA fails to achieve recanalization. This study investigates the outcomes of incorporating stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in the rescue strategy following failed CA. Methods: EVT patients with failed CA attempts were identified from a large multicenter registry and stratified by rescue technique: CA alone or incorporating SR in the rescue strategy. Outcomes included successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes (defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results: Among 1885 patients with failed CA attempts, conversion to SR was associated with higher recanalization rates (85.2% vs 80.6%; p=0.03), higher rates of second-pass recanalization (31.2% vs 23.4%; p<0.001), and better 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2: 35.2% vs 29.9%; p=0.04) when compared with repeated CA attempts. Trevo SRs showed higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; p=0.02), second-pass recanalization (aOR=1.7; p=0.01), and reduced odds of sICH (aOR=0.3; p=0.02). EmboTrap SRs were associated with higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR=2.6; p=0.004) and sICH (aOR=2.9; p=0.04) and lower odds of recanalization (aOR=0.5; p=0.03). Conclusions: Incorporating SR in the rescue strategy after a failed CA improves recanalization rates and functional outcomes. Trevo SRs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when incorporated into the rescue strategy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of neurointerventional surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • Reperfusion
  • Stent
  • Stroke
  • Technique
  • Thrombectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative efficacy and safety of stent retrievers as a bailout strategy following failed contact aspiration technique in acute stroke thrombectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this