TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative study of solutions for pulmonary preservation using an isolated rabbit lung model
AU - Al-Dossari, Ghannam A.
AU - Shumway, Sara J.
N1 - Funding Information:
All animals received humane care in compliance with the ``Principles of Laboratory Animal Care'' formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the ``Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals'' prepared by the National Academy of Sciences and published by the National Institutes of Health.
PY - 1998/3
Y1 - 1998/3
N2 - At the University of Minnesota, University of Wisconsin (UW), modified Euro-Collins (MEC), and Marshall (M) solutions were compared as agents for pulmonary preservation in an isolated rabbit lung model. Normal saline (NS) was used as a control. The heart-lung blocks of donor rabbits were flushed with, and then preserved in, one of the solutions at 4°C. Five rabbits were studied in each group. After 8 h of cold ischemia, the left lung was ventilated and reperfused with fresh venous blood from donor rabbits for 30 min. Pulmonary function was assessed by serial measurements of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) tensions in blood obtained from the left atrial appendage. The ratios of wet/dry (W/D) weight of the lungs were calculated to assess the extent of pulmonary edema. After 8 h of preservation followed by 30 min of reperfusion, O2 tension was significantly higher with UW (178.36 + 1.72 mmHg). The calculated P values were UW vs NS, <0.0001; UW vs MEC, 0.154; and UW vs M, 0.0001. CO2 tension with UW was also lower than the other solutions: UW, 35.8 ± 0.698 mmHg; NS, 48.5 ± 0.745 mmHg; MEC, 40.69 ± 0.749 mmHg; and M, 44.68 ± 0.697 mmHg. The calculated P value was UW vs NS, 0.0001; UW vs MEC, 0.0003; and UW vs M, 0.0001 using repeated-measures analysis of covariance. The W/D ratio was lower with UW as well: UW, 6.82 ± 0.19; NS, 8.01 ± 0.23; MEC, 7.28 ± 0.10; and M, 7.34 ± 0.17. The P value was <0.001 using post-hoc tests. In this model, UW solution preserved the lungs better than the other three solutions tested and therefore warrants further clinical application.
AB - At the University of Minnesota, University of Wisconsin (UW), modified Euro-Collins (MEC), and Marshall (M) solutions were compared as agents for pulmonary preservation in an isolated rabbit lung model. Normal saline (NS) was used as a control. The heart-lung blocks of donor rabbits were flushed with, and then preserved in, one of the solutions at 4°C. Five rabbits were studied in each group. After 8 h of cold ischemia, the left lung was ventilated and reperfused with fresh venous blood from donor rabbits for 30 min. Pulmonary function was assessed by serial measurements of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) tensions in blood obtained from the left atrial appendage. The ratios of wet/dry (W/D) weight of the lungs were calculated to assess the extent of pulmonary edema. After 8 h of preservation followed by 30 min of reperfusion, O2 tension was significantly higher with UW (178.36 + 1.72 mmHg). The calculated P values were UW vs NS, <0.0001; UW vs MEC, 0.154; and UW vs M, 0.0001. CO2 tension with UW was also lower than the other solutions: UW, 35.8 ± 0.698 mmHg; NS, 48.5 ± 0.745 mmHg; MEC, 40.69 ± 0.749 mmHg; and M, 44.68 ± 0.697 mmHg. The calculated P value was UW vs NS, 0.0001; UW vs MEC, 0.0003; and UW vs M, 0.0001 using repeated-measures analysis of covariance. The W/D ratio was lower with UW as well: UW, 6.82 ± 0.19; NS, 8.01 ± 0.23; MEC, 7.28 ± 0.10; and M, 7.34 ± 0.17. The P value was <0.001 using post-hoc tests. In this model, UW solution preserved the lungs better than the other three solutions tested and therefore warrants further clinical application.
KW - Preservation
KW - Pulmonary
KW - Solutions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031777108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031777108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/jsre.1998.5296
DO - 10.1006/jsre.1998.5296
M3 - Article
C2 - 9655094
AN - SCOPUS:0031777108
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 75
SP - 187
EP - 191
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 2
ER -