Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters

Vinod Panchbhavi, Saul Trevino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there are intraobserver and interobserver differences in reliability when measuring hallux valgus angles (HVA), 1-2 intermetatarsal angles (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angles (DMAA) manually compared to computer-assisted means. Our hypothesis was that the measurements taken by computer-assisted methods of these three forefoot angles would be superior in consistency and accuracy compared to manual measurements. Methods: Four examiners studied 20 weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of patients with hallux valgus. Manual measurements were taken on photographic prints using a goniometer and a fine point pen. Computer-assisted measurements were taken on digitized images using computer software. Three sets of measurements by both of these methods were taken 1 week apart. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between digital and manual measurements for any of the three angles measured (p.05). However, the reliability of measurements within a range of 5 degrees for both methods was 70.6% for HVA, 84% for 1-2 IMA, and 59% for DMAA. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in interobserver and intraobserver reliability in measuring 1-2 IMA and HVA, regardless of the method of measurement; however, there was a significant difference in interobserver reliability when measuring the DMAA either on computer or manually (p = < .05).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)708-711
Number of pages4
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume25
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2004

Fingerprint

Hallux Valgus
Metatarsal Bones
Joints
Weight-Bearing
Software

Keywords

  • Computer Measurement
  • Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle
  • Hallux Valgus
  • Intermetatarsal 1-2 angle
  • Manual Measurement
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters. / Panchbhavi, Vinod; Trevino, Saul.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 25, No. 10, 10.2004, p. 708-711.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{761ad07c946d476e8e96f67ae014f379,
title = "Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters",
abstract = "Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there are intraobserver and interobserver differences in reliability when measuring hallux valgus angles (HVA), 1-2 intermetatarsal angles (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angles (DMAA) manually compared to computer-assisted means. Our hypothesis was that the measurements taken by computer-assisted methods of these three forefoot angles would be superior in consistency and accuracy compared to manual measurements. Methods: Four examiners studied 20 weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of patients with hallux valgus. Manual measurements were taken on photographic prints using a goniometer and a fine point pen. Computer-assisted measurements were taken on digitized images using computer software. Three sets of measurements by both of these methods were taken 1 week apart. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between digital and manual measurements for any of the three angles measured (p.05). However, the reliability of measurements within a range of 5 degrees for both methods was 70.6{\%} for HVA, 84{\%} for 1-2 IMA, and 59{\%} for DMAA. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in interobserver and intraobserver reliability in measuring 1-2 IMA and HVA, regardless of the method of measurement; however, there was a significant difference in interobserver reliability when measuring the DMAA either on computer or manually (p = < .05).",
keywords = "Computer Measurement, Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle, Hallux Valgus, Intermetatarsal 1-2 angle, Manual Measurement, Reliability",
author = "Vinod Panchbhavi and Saul Trevino",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "708--711",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

AU - Trevino, Saul

PY - 2004/10

Y1 - 2004/10

N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there are intraobserver and interobserver differences in reliability when measuring hallux valgus angles (HVA), 1-2 intermetatarsal angles (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angles (DMAA) manually compared to computer-assisted means. Our hypothesis was that the measurements taken by computer-assisted methods of these three forefoot angles would be superior in consistency and accuracy compared to manual measurements. Methods: Four examiners studied 20 weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of patients with hallux valgus. Manual measurements were taken on photographic prints using a goniometer and a fine point pen. Computer-assisted measurements were taken on digitized images using computer software. Three sets of measurements by both of these methods were taken 1 week apart. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between digital and manual measurements for any of the three angles measured (p.05). However, the reliability of measurements within a range of 5 degrees for both methods was 70.6% for HVA, 84% for 1-2 IMA, and 59% for DMAA. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in interobserver and intraobserver reliability in measuring 1-2 IMA and HVA, regardless of the method of measurement; however, there was a significant difference in interobserver reliability when measuring the DMAA either on computer or manually (p = < .05).

AB - Background: The aim of this study was to determine if there are intraobserver and interobserver differences in reliability when measuring hallux valgus angles (HVA), 1-2 intermetatarsal angles (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angles (DMAA) manually compared to computer-assisted means. Our hypothesis was that the measurements taken by computer-assisted methods of these three forefoot angles would be superior in consistency and accuracy compared to manual measurements. Methods: Four examiners studied 20 weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of patients with hallux valgus. Manual measurements were taken on photographic prints using a goniometer and a fine point pen. Computer-assisted measurements were taken on digitized images using computer software. Three sets of measurements by both of these methods were taken 1 week apart. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between digital and manual measurements for any of the three angles measured (p.05). However, the reliability of measurements within a range of 5 degrees for both methods was 70.6% for HVA, 84% for 1-2 IMA, and 59% for DMAA. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in interobserver and intraobserver reliability in measuring 1-2 IMA and HVA, regardless of the method of measurement; however, there was a significant difference in interobserver reliability when measuring the DMAA either on computer or manually (p = < .05).

KW - Computer Measurement

KW - Distal Metatarsal Articular Angle

KW - Hallux Valgus

KW - Intermetatarsal 1-2 angle

KW - Manual Measurement

KW - Reliability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7244224894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7244224894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15566701

AN - SCOPUS:7244224894

VL - 25

SP - 708

EP - 711

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 10

ER -