Comparison of bolus injection and constant infusion methods for measuring muscle protein fractional synthesis rate in humans

Demidmaa Tuvdendorj, David L. Chinkes, John Bahadorani, Xiao Jun Zhang, Melinda Sheffield-Moore, Lois A. Killewich, Robert R. Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The use of stable isotope tracer techniques to measure muscle protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) has been well established and widely used. The most common method that has been utilized so far is a primed constant infusion (CI) method, which requires 3-4 h of tracer infusion. However, recently our group has developed a bolus injection (BI) method, which requires an injection of bolus of tracer and can be completed within 1 h. In this study, we compared calf (gastrocnemius) muscle protein FSR measured using these two different methods - CI and BI. Method FSRs were measured in eight people (5 men and 3 women; age: 62.3 ± 6.9 years (mean ± SD); body weight: 75.4 ± 21.5 kg) at basal, postabsorptive state using L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine. In the CI protocol, a primed continuous infusion was given for 4 h, and muscle biopsies were taken at 120 and 240 min; in the BI, a bolus injection of the tracer was given at 0 min and biopsies were taken at 5 and 60 min. Tracer enrichments in blood and muscle tissue were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Data are expressed as mean ± SE; t-test, linear regression and Levene Median equal variance test analyses were performed. Results CI FSR was 0.066 ± 0.006%/h, whereas BI FSR was 0.058 ± 0.008%/h, p = NS. The linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between BI and CI, p = 0.038. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.83. The standard deviation of the differences in the measurements was 0.015%/h. The Levene Median equal variance test demonstrated no difference in variance between the CI and BI measurements (p = 0.722). Conclusion No difference could be detected in calf muscle protein FSR measured by CI and BI methods; the BI method can be used for the measurement of muscle protein FSR in humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1562-1567
Number of pages6
JournalMetabolism: Clinical and Experimental
Volume63
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Muscle Proteins
Injections
Linear Models
Biopsy
Muscles
Phenylalanine
Isotopes
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Analysis of Variance
Skeletal Muscle
Body Weight
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Bolus injection method
  • Constant infusion method
  • Fractional synthesis rate
  • Muscle protein
  • Stable isotope tracer techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Comparison of bolus injection and constant infusion methods for measuring muscle protein fractional synthesis rate in humans. / Tuvdendorj, Demidmaa; Chinkes, David L.; Bahadorani, John; Zhang, Xiao Jun; Sheffield-Moore, Melinda; Killewich, Lois A.; Wolfe, Robert R.

In: Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, Vol. 63, No. 12, 01.12.2014, p. 1562-1567.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tuvdendorj, Demidmaa ; Chinkes, David L. ; Bahadorani, John ; Zhang, Xiao Jun ; Sheffield-Moore, Melinda ; Killewich, Lois A. ; Wolfe, Robert R. / Comparison of bolus injection and constant infusion methods for measuring muscle protein fractional synthesis rate in humans. In: Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental. 2014 ; Vol. 63, No. 12. pp. 1562-1567.
@article{46453ce17712467e8a6a1fbca69df306,
title = "Comparison of bolus injection and constant infusion methods for measuring muscle protein fractional synthesis rate in humans",
abstract = "Background The use of stable isotope tracer techniques to measure muscle protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) has been well established and widely used. The most common method that has been utilized so far is a primed constant infusion (CI) method, which requires 3-4 h of tracer infusion. However, recently our group has developed a bolus injection (BI) method, which requires an injection of bolus of tracer and can be completed within 1 h. In this study, we compared calf (gastrocnemius) muscle protein FSR measured using these two different methods - CI and BI. Method FSRs were measured in eight people (5 men and 3 women; age: 62.3 ± 6.9 years (mean ± SD); body weight: 75.4 ± 21.5 kg) at basal, postabsorptive state using L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine. In the CI protocol, a primed continuous infusion was given for 4 h, and muscle biopsies were taken at 120 and 240 min; in the BI, a bolus injection of the tracer was given at 0 min and biopsies were taken at 5 and 60 min. Tracer enrichments in blood and muscle tissue were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Data are expressed as mean ± SE; t-test, linear regression and Levene Median equal variance test analyses were performed. Results CI FSR was 0.066 ± 0.006{\%}/h, whereas BI FSR was 0.058 ± 0.008{\%}/h, p = NS. The linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between BI and CI, p = 0.038. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.83. The standard deviation of the differences in the measurements was 0.015{\%}/h. The Levene Median equal variance test demonstrated no difference in variance between the CI and BI measurements (p = 0.722). Conclusion No difference could be detected in calf muscle protein FSR measured by CI and BI methods; the BI method can be used for the measurement of muscle protein FSR in humans.",
keywords = "Bolus injection method, Constant infusion method, Fractional synthesis rate, Muscle protein, Stable isotope tracer techniques",
author = "Demidmaa Tuvdendorj and Chinkes, {David L.} and John Bahadorani and Zhang, {Xiao Jun} and Melinda Sheffield-Moore and Killewich, {Lois A.} and Wolfe, {Robert R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.metabol.2014.09.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "1562--1567",
journal = "Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental",
issn = "0026-0495",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bolus injection and constant infusion methods for measuring muscle protein fractional synthesis rate in humans

AU - Tuvdendorj, Demidmaa

AU - Chinkes, David L.

AU - Bahadorani, John

AU - Zhang, Xiao Jun

AU - Sheffield-Moore, Melinda

AU - Killewich, Lois A.

AU - Wolfe, Robert R.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Background The use of stable isotope tracer techniques to measure muscle protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) has been well established and widely used. The most common method that has been utilized so far is a primed constant infusion (CI) method, which requires 3-4 h of tracer infusion. However, recently our group has developed a bolus injection (BI) method, which requires an injection of bolus of tracer and can be completed within 1 h. In this study, we compared calf (gastrocnemius) muscle protein FSR measured using these two different methods - CI and BI. Method FSRs were measured in eight people (5 men and 3 women; age: 62.3 ± 6.9 years (mean ± SD); body weight: 75.4 ± 21.5 kg) at basal, postabsorptive state using L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine. In the CI protocol, a primed continuous infusion was given for 4 h, and muscle biopsies were taken at 120 and 240 min; in the BI, a bolus injection of the tracer was given at 0 min and biopsies were taken at 5 and 60 min. Tracer enrichments in blood and muscle tissue were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Data are expressed as mean ± SE; t-test, linear regression and Levene Median equal variance test analyses were performed. Results CI FSR was 0.066 ± 0.006%/h, whereas BI FSR was 0.058 ± 0.008%/h, p = NS. The linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between BI and CI, p = 0.038. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.83. The standard deviation of the differences in the measurements was 0.015%/h. The Levene Median equal variance test demonstrated no difference in variance between the CI and BI measurements (p = 0.722). Conclusion No difference could be detected in calf muscle protein FSR measured by CI and BI methods; the BI method can be used for the measurement of muscle protein FSR in humans.

AB - Background The use of stable isotope tracer techniques to measure muscle protein fractional synthesis rate (FSR) has been well established and widely used. The most common method that has been utilized so far is a primed constant infusion (CI) method, which requires 3-4 h of tracer infusion. However, recently our group has developed a bolus injection (BI) method, which requires an injection of bolus of tracer and can be completed within 1 h. In this study, we compared calf (gastrocnemius) muscle protein FSR measured using these two different methods - CI and BI. Method FSRs were measured in eight people (5 men and 3 women; age: 62.3 ± 6.9 years (mean ± SD); body weight: 75.4 ± 21.5 kg) at basal, postabsorptive state using L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine. In the CI protocol, a primed continuous infusion was given for 4 h, and muscle biopsies were taken at 120 and 240 min; in the BI, a bolus injection of the tracer was given at 0 min and biopsies were taken at 5 and 60 min. Tracer enrichments in blood and muscle tissue were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Data are expressed as mean ± SE; t-test, linear regression and Levene Median equal variance test analyses were performed. Results CI FSR was 0.066 ± 0.006%/h, whereas BI FSR was 0.058 ± 0.008%/h, p = NS. The linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between BI and CI, p = 0.038. The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.83. The standard deviation of the differences in the measurements was 0.015%/h. The Levene Median equal variance test demonstrated no difference in variance between the CI and BI measurements (p = 0.722). Conclusion No difference could be detected in calf muscle protein FSR measured by CI and BI methods; the BI method can be used for the measurement of muscle protein FSR in humans.

KW - Bolus injection method

KW - Constant infusion method

KW - Fractional synthesis rate

KW - Muscle protein

KW - Stable isotope tracer techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961292217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961292217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.09.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 25308445

AN - SCOPUS:84961292217

VL - 63

SP - 1562

EP - 1567

JO - Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental

JF - Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental

SN - 0026-0495

IS - 12

ER -