Comparison of Costs of Radical Cystectomy vs Trimodal Therapy for Patients with Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Stephen B. Williams, Yong Shan, Mohamed D. Ray-Zack, Hogan K. Hudgins, Usama Jazzar, Douglas Tyler, Stephen J. Freedland, Todd Swanson, Jacques G. Baillargeon, Jim C. Hu, Sapna Kaul, Ashish M. Kamat, John L. Gore, Hemalkumar Mehta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments lack granularity and are limited to 180 days. Objective: To compare the 1-year costs associated with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, accounting for survival and intensity effects on total costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and included 2963 patients aged 66 to 85 years who had received a diagnosis of clinical stage T2 to T4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. The data analysis was performed from March 5, 2018, through December 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical cystectomy vs trimodal therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models that included a 2-part estimator to account for intrinsic selection bias. Results: Of 2963 participants, 1030 (34.8%) were women, 2591 (87.4%) were white, 129 (4.4%) were African American, and 98 (3.3%) were Hispanic. Median costs were significantly higher for trimodal therapy than radical cystectomy in 90 days (83754 vs 68692; median difference, 11805; 95% CI, 7745-15864), 180 days (187162 vs 109078; median difference, 62370; 95% CI, 55581-69160), and 365 days (289142 vs 148757; median difference, 109027; 95% CI, 98692-119363), respectively. Outpatient care, radiology, medication expenses, and pathology/laboratory costs contributed largely to the higher costs associated with trimodal therapy. On inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjusted analyses, patients undergoing trimodal therapy had 136935 (95% CI, 122131-152115) higher mean costs compared with radical cystectomy 1 year after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy was associated with higher costs among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The differences in costs were largely attributed to medication and radiology expenses associated with trimodal therapy. Extrapolating cost figures resulted in a nationwide excess spending of 468 million for trimodal therapy compared with radical cystectomy for patients who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer in 2017.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere191629
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume154
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Costs of Radical Cystectomy vs Trimodal Therapy for Patients with Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this