Comparison of Frailty Measures as Predictors of Outcomes After Orthopedic Surgery

Zara Cooper, Selwyn O. Rogers, Long Ngo, Jamey Guess, Eva Schmitt, Richard N. Jones, Douglas K. Ayres, Jeremy D. Walston, Thomas M. Gill, Lauren J. Gleason, Sharon K. Inouye, Edward R. Marcantonio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To apply the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and Frailty Index (FI) before major elective orthopedic surgery to categorize frailty status and assess associations with postoperative outcomes. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Two tertiary hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. Participants: Individuals aged 70 and older undergoing scheduled orthopedic surgery enrolled in the Successful Aging after Elective Surgery (SAGES) Study (N = 415). Measurements: Preoperative evaluation included assessment of frailty using the FP and FI. The weighted kappa statistic was used to determine concordance between the two frailty measures and multivariable modeling to determine associations between each measure and postoperative complications, postoperative length of stay (LOS) of longer than 5 days, discharge to postacute institutional care (PAC), and 300 day readmission. Results: Frailty was highly prevalent (FP, 35%; FI, 41%). There was moderate concordance between the FP and FI (κ = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.49). When using the FP, being prefrail predicted greater risk of complications (relative risk (RR) = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.1–2.1) and discharge to PAC (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.2–2.9) than being robust, and being frail predicted more complications (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.1–2.1), LOS longer than 5 days (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.1–8.8), and discharge to PAC (RR = 2.3 95% CI = 1.4–3.7). When using FI, being prefrail predicted LOS longer than 5 days (RR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.0–4.8) and discharge to PAC (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.4–2.1), as did being frail (RR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4–2.5; RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.4–6.8, respectively). The other outcomes were not significantly associated with frailty status. Conclusion: FP and FI predict postoperative outcomes after major elective orthopedic surgery and should be considered for preoperative risk stratification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2464-2471
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume64
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Keywords

  • elderly
  • frailty measures
  • orthopedic procedures
  • preoperative evaluation
  • surgery outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Frailty Measures as Predictors of Outcomes After Orthopedic Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Cooper, Z., Rogers, S. O., Ngo, L., Guess, J., Schmitt, E., Jones, R. N., Ayres, D. K., Walston, J. D., Gill, T. M., Gleason, L. J., Inouye, S. K., & Marcantonio, E. R. (2016). Comparison of Frailty Measures as Predictors of Outcomes After Orthopedic Surgery. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 64(12), 2464-2471. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14387