Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Conor P. Delaney, A. Craig Lynch, Anthony J. Senagore, Victor W. Fazio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

232 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Robotic laparoscopic surgery is postulated to result in better surgical results by allowing improved instrument manipulation and three-dimensional vision. The authors' experience performing robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reported. METHOD: Standard laparoscopic procedures with robot-assisted laparoscopic colon mobilization and vascular ligation were performed. Data relating to the operative procedure, hospital stay, and direct costs were collected. Results were compared with age, gender, and procedure case-matched controls taken from a prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. RESULTS: Six robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (2 right hemicolectomies, 3 sigmoid colectomies, and 1 Wells rectopexy) were performed between December 2001 and June 2002. There was no associated morbidity. Operative time was increased from a median time of 108 minutes for standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery to 165 minutes for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (P = 0.0313; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for non-parametric data). This was primarily a result of the time required for robot set-up. Blood loss, length of stay, and hospital cost were not significantly different between groups. Additional direct equipment costs for RAC cases included robotic laparoscopic instruments and sterile drapes (approximately US $350 per case), without including acquisition and maintenance costs for the robot. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Although three-dimensional vision and dexterity are facilitated, operative time is increased and the overall additional expense of robotics is of concern. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy requires further evaluation to establish clinical and financial benefits before introduction to routine practice. Such techniques may, in the future, facilitate complex laparoscopic techniques.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1633-1639
Number of pages7
JournalDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Volume46
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Laparoscopy
Colectomy
Robotics
Operative Time
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Hospital Costs
Operative Surgical Procedures
Sigmoid Colon
Ligation
Blood Vessels
Colon
Maintenance
Databases
Morbidity
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
  • Operative time
  • Robotically performed
  • Surgical costs
  • Traditional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Delaney, C. P., Lynch, A. C., Senagore, A. J., & Fazio, V. W. (2003). Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 46(12), 1633-1639.

Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. / Delaney, Conor P.; Lynch, A. Craig; Senagore, Anthony J.; Fazio, Victor W.

In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, Vol. 46, No. 12, 12.2003, p. 1633-1639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Delaney, CP, Lynch, AC, Senagore, AJ & Fazio, VW 2003, 'Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery', Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1633-1639.
Delaney, Conor P. ; Lynch, A. Craig ; Senagore, Anthony J. ; Fazio, Victor W. / Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2003 ; Vol. 46, No. 12. pp. 1633-1639.
@article{62ad59653dad45858671f84101c40bd0,
title = "Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Robotic laparoscopic surgery is postulated to result in better surgical results by allowing improved instrument manipulation and three-dimensional vision. The authors' experience performing robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reported. METHOD: Standard laparoscopic procedures with robot-assisted laparoscopic colon mobilization and vascular ligation were performed. Data relating to the operative procedure, hospital stay, and direct costs were collected. Results were compared with age, gender, and procedure case-matched controls taken from a prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. RESULTS: Six robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (2 right hemicolectomies, 3 sigmoid colectomies, and 1 Wells rectopexy) were performed between December 2001 and June 2002. There was no associated morbidity. Operative time was increased from a median time of 108 minutes for standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery to 165 minutes for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (P = 0.0313; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for non-parametric data). This was primarily a result of the time required for robot set-up. Blood loss, length of stay, and hospital cost were not significantly different between groups. Additional direct equipment costs for RAC cases included robotic laparoscopic instruments and sterile drapes (approximately US $350 per case), without including acquisition and maintenance costs for the robot. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Although three-dimensional vision and dexterity are facilitated, operative time is increased and the overall additional expense of robotics is of concern. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy requires further evaluation to establish clinical and financial benefits before introduction to routine practice. Such techniques may, in the future, facilitate complex laparoscopic techniques.",
keywords = "Laparoscopic colorectal surgery, Operative time, Robotically performed, Surgical costs, Traditional",
author = "Delaney, {Conor P.} and Lynch, {A. Craig} and Senagore, {Anthony J.} and Fazio, {Victor W.}",
year = "2003",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1633--1639",
journal = "Diseases of the Colon and Rectum",
issn = "0012-3706",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Robotically Performed and Traditional Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

AU - Delaney, Conor P.

AU - Lynch, A. Craig

AU - Senagore, Anthony J.

AU - Fazio, Victor W.

PY - 2003/12

Y1 - 2003/12

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Robotic laparoscopic surgery is postulated to result in better surgical results by allowing improved instrument manipulation and three-dimensional vision. The authors' experience performing robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reported. METHOD: Standard laparoscopic procedures with robot-assisted laparoscopic colon mobilization and vascular ligation were performed. Data relating to the operative procedure, hospital stay, and direct costs were collected. Results were compared with age, gender, and procedure case-matched controls taken from a prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. RESULTS: Six robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (2 right hemicolectomies, 3 sigmoid colectomies, and 1 Wells rectopexy) were performed between December 2001 and June 2002. There was no associated morbidity. Operative time was increased from a median time of 108 minutes for standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery to 165 minutes for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (P = 0.0313; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for non-parametric data). This was primarily a result of the time required for robot set-up. Blood loss, length of stay, and hospital cost were not significantly different between groups. Additional direct equipment costs for RAC cases included robotic laparoscopic instruments and sterile drapes (approximately US $350 per case), without including acquisition and maintenance costs for the robot. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Although three-dimensional vision and dexterity are facilitated, operative time is increased and the overall additional expense of robotics is of concern. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy requires further evaluation to establish clinical and financial benefits before introduction to routine practice. Such techniques may, in the future, facilitate complex laparoscopic techniques.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Robotic laparoscopic surgery is postulated to result in better surgical results by allowing improved instrument manipulation and three-dimensional vision. The authors' experience performing robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reported. METHOD: Standard laparoscopic procedures with robot-assisted laparoscopic colon mobilization and vascular ligation were performed. Data relating to the operative procedure, hospital stay, and direct costs were collected. Results were compared with age, gender, and procedure case-matched controls taken from a prospective laparoscopic colorectal surgery database. RESULTS: Six robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (2 right hemicolectomies, 3 sigmoid colectomies, and 1 Wells rectopexy) were performed between December 2001 and June 2002. There was no associated morbidity. Operative time was increased from a median time of 108 minutes for standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery to 165 minutes for robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (P = 0.0313; Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test for non-parametric data). This was primarily a result of the time required for robot set-up. Blood loss, length of stay, and hospital cost were not significantly different between groups. Additional direct equipment costs for RAC cases included robotic laparoscopic instruments and sterile drapes (approximately US $350 per case), without including acquisition and maintenance costs for the robot. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is a feasible and safe procedure. Although three-dimensional vision and dexterity are facilitated, operative time is increased and the overall additional expense of robotics is of concern. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy requires further evaluation to establish clinical and financial benefits before introduction to routine practice. Such techniques may, in the future, facilitate complex laparoscopic techniques.

KW - Laparoscopic colorectal surgery

KW - Operative time

KW - Robotically performed

KW - Surgical costs

KW - Traditional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346150344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346150344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14668588

AN - SCOPUS:0346150344

VL - 46

SP - 1633

EP - 1639

JO - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

JF - Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

SN - 0012-3706

IS - 12

ER -