Comparison of Spatiotemporal and Energy Cost of the Use of 3 Different Walkers and Unassisted Walking in Older Adults

Elizabeth J. Protas, Mary Lynn Raines, Sandrine Tissier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protas EJ, Raines ML, Tissier S. Comparison of spatiotemporal and energy cost of the use of 3 different walkers and unassisted walking in older adults. Objective: To compare temporal, spatial, and oxygen costs of gait while elderly subjects walked without an assistive device, with a new assistive device, and with 2 other commercially available assistive devices. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based research laboratory. Participants: Thirteen healthy older subjects who could walk without an assistive device. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, cadence, stride lengths, 5-minute walk distance and gait speed, oxygen consumption (V̇o2) per meter walked, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) per meter walked, and minute ventilation per meter walked. Results: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, and stride lengths decreased when the Merry Walker device was used, compared with walking without an assistive device. Outcome measures when walking with either the wheeled walker or the WalkAbout did not differ significantly from walking without a device except for a faster cadence with the WalkAbout. The distance walked and gait speed were decreased and the RER and minute ventilation were increased during the 5-minute walk with the Merry Walker compared with normal walking. The V̇o2 was higher with the wheeled walker and Merry Walker than when walking without an assistive device, but there was no difference when the WalkAbout was used. Conclusions: Older adults walked in the new assistive device, the WalkAbout, with parameters that did not differ significantly from their gait without a device. The oxygen demands of walking were similar to unassisted walking for the WalkAbout, but were higher for the wheeled walker and Merry Walker. These results may help guide the prescription of assistive devices for older adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)768-773
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume88
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Self-Help Devices
Walking
Costs and Cost Analysis
Gait
Equipment and Supplies
Ventilation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Walkers
Oxygen
Oxygen Consumption
Prescriptions
Walking Speed
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Assistive devices
  • Gait
  • Rehabilitation
  • Walkers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Comparison of Spatiotemporal and Energy Cost of the Use of 3 Different Walkers and Unassisted Walking in Older Adults. / Protas, Elizabeth J.; Raines, Mary Lynn; Tissier, Sandrine.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 88, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 768-773.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6d0ac3d3588f4e49a43a4eaa555dc7cc,
title = "Comparison of Spatiotemporal and Energy Cost of the Use of 3 Different Walkers and Unassisted Walking in Older Adults",
abstract = "Protas EJ, Raines ML, Tissier S. Comparison of spatiotemporal and energy cost of the use of 3 different walkers and unassisted walking in older adults. Objective: To compare temporal, spatial, and oxygen costs of gait while elderly subjects walked without an assistive device, with a new assistive device, and with 2 other commercially available assistive devices. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based research laboratory. Participants: Thirteen healthy older subjects who could walk without an assistive device. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, cadence, stride lengths, 5-minute walk distance and gait speed, oxygen consumption (V̇o2) per meter walked, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) per meter walked, and minute ventilation per meter walked. Results: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, and stride lengths decreased when the Merry Walker device was used, compared with walking without an assistive device. Outcome measures when walking with either the wheeled walker or the WalkAbout did not differ significantly from walking without a device except for a faster cadence with the WalkAbout. The distance walked and gait speed were decreased and the RER and minute ventilation were increased during the 5-minute walk with the Merry Walker compared with normal walking. The V̇o2 was higher with the wheeled walker and Merry Walker than when walking without an assistive device, but there was no difference when the WalkAbout was used. Conclusions: Older adults walked in the new assistive device, the WalkAbout, with parameters that did not differ significantly from their gait without a device. The oxygen demands of walking were similar to unassisted walking for the WalkAbout, but were higher for the wheeled walker and Merry Walker. These results may help guide the prescription of assistive devices for older adults.",
keywords = "Aging, Assistive devices, Gait, Rehabilitation, Walkers",
author = "Protas, {Elizabeth J.} and Raines, {Mary Lynn} and Sandrine Tissier",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "768--773",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Spatiotemporal and Energy Cost of the Use of 3 Different Walkers and Unassisted Walking in Older Adults

AU - Protas, Elizabeth J.

AU - Raines, Mary Lynn

AU - Tissier, Sandrine

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Protas EJ, Raines ML, Tissier S. Comparison of spatiotemporal and energy cost of the use of 3 different walkers and unassisted walking in older adults. Objective: To compare temporal, spatial, and oxygen costs of gait while elderly subjects walked without an assistive device, with a new assistive device, and with 2 other commercially available assistive devices. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based research laboratory. Participants: Thirteen healthy older subjects who could walk without an assistive device. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, cadence, stride lengths, 5-minute walk distance and gait speed, oxygen consumption (V̇o2) per meter walked, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) per meter walked, and minute ventilation per meter walked. Results: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, and stride lengths decreased when the Merry Walker device was used, compared with walking without an assistive device. Outcome measures when walking with either the wheeled walker or the WalkAbout did not differ significantly from walking without a device except for a faster cadence with the WalkAbout. The distance walked and gait speed were decreased and the RER and minute ventilation were increased during the 5-minute walk with the Merry Walker compared with normal walking. The V̇o2 was higher with the wheeled walker and Merry Walker than when walking without an assistive device, but there was no difference when the WalkAbout was used. Conclusions: Older adults walked in the new assistive device, the WalkAbout, with parameters that did not differ significantly from their gait without a device. The oxygen demands of walking were similar to unassisted walking for the WalkAbout, but were higher for the wheeled walker and Merry Walker. These results may help guide the prescription of assistive devices for older adults.

AB - Protas EJ, Raines ML, Tissier S. Comparison of spatiotemporal and energy cost of the use of 3 different walkers and unassisted walking in older adults. Objective: To compare temporal, spatial, and oxygen costs of gait while elderly subjects walked without an assistive device, with a new assistive device, and with 2 other commercially available assistive devices. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based research laboratory. Participants: Thirteen healthy older subjects who could walk without an assistive device. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, cadence, stride lengths, 5-minute walk distance and gait speed, oxygen consumption (V̇o2) per meter walked, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) per meter walked, and minute ventilation per meter walked. Results: Gait speed, normalized gait speed, and stride lengths decreased when the Merry Walker device was used, compared with walking without an assistive device. Outcome measures when walking with either the wheeled walker or the WalkAbout did not differ significantly from walking without a device except for a faster cadence with the WalkAbout. The distance walked and gait speed were decreased and the RER and minute ventilation were increased during the 5-minute walk with the Merry Walker compared with normal walking. The V̇o2 was higher with the wheeled walker and Merry Walker than when walking without an assistive device, but there was no difference when the WalkAbout was used. Conclusions: Older adults walked in the new assistive device, the WalkAbout, with parameters that did not differ significantly from their gait without a device. The oxygen demands of walking were similar to unassisted walking for the WalkAbout, but were higher for the wheeled walker and Merry Walker. These results may help guide the prescription of assistive devices for older adults.

KW - Aging

KW - Assistive devices

KW - Gait

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Walkers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249013042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249013042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 768

EP - 773

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 6

ER -