Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices

David B. Engler, Alan C. DeJarnatt, Tommy C. Sim, Jana L. Lee, J. Andrew Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty volunteers were skin tested with seven concentrations of histamine phosphate and a glycerosaline control to determine the relative sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices Greer Pen (GP), Greer DermaPIK (DP), Center Multi-Test (MT), and Morrow Brown needle (MB). The end points of the study were (1) wheal and flare response of each device, with a dose-response curve, (2) the time required to apply each set of eight tests, and (3) the volunteers' subjective assessment of each device. On a different day, 10 of the volunteers were tested to determine the precision of each device. Dose-response curves for half-log dilutions of histamine phosphate were produced with a glycerosaline control. The DP and GP induced wheal and flare responses discernible from that of the glycerosaline control at a lower concentration of histamine phosphate than the MB and MT. The DP took a shorter time to apply eight samples than any other device. The MB was preferred by the most volunteers, but any device tested on the upper half of the back was usually preferred over that tested on the lower half. When 5 mg ml histamine phosphate was used, coefficients of variation for each device demonstrated that for wheals the precision of the DP, GP, and MT was similar (mean, 21.1%, 23.1%, and 24.5%, respectively). The MB was larger (mean, 59.9%). For flares, the precision of GP and DP was similar (mean, 22.0% and 23.5%, respectively), with the MT and MB larger (mean, 35.5% and 58.@%, respectively). Repeating the analysis for the MB with 10 mg ml histamine phosphate, we found a mean coefficient of variation of 16.5% for wheals and 19.6% for flares. We conclude that the DP is equal to the GP in precision and sensitivity for wheal and flare, but it has the advantage of allowing allergy skin testing to be performed more quickly. The MT has similar precision for wheals but has less precision for flares. The MB device is more precise only with higher concentrations of histamine phosphate than those routinely used in the clinical practice of allergy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)985-991
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Volume90
Issue number6 PART 1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Skin Tests
Needles
Equipment and Supplies
Volunteers
Hypersensitivity
Skin
histamine phosphate

Keywords

  • allergy testing
  • histamine
  • Skin testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Immunology and Allergy

Cite this

Engler, D. B., DeJarnatt, A. C., Sim, T. C., Lee, J. L., & Grant, J. A. (1992). Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 90(6 PART 1), 985-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(92)90472-E

Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices. / Engler, David B.; DeJarnatt, Alan C.; Sim, Tommy C.; Lee, Jana L.; Grant, J. Andrew.

In: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Vol. 90, No. 6 PART 1, 1992, p. 985-991.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Engler, David B. ; DeJarnatt, Alan C. ; Sim, Tommy C. ; Lee, Jana L. ; Grant, J. Andrew. / Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices. In: The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 1992 ; Vol. 90, No. 6 PART 1. pp. 985-991.
@article{3c7a90f9e91d4734818f863fdcd46f6b,
title = "Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices",
abstract = "Twenty volunteers were skin tested with seven concentrations of histamine phosphate and a glycerosaline control to determine the relative sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices Greer Pen (GP), Greer DermaPIK (DP), Center Multi-Test (MT), and Morrow Brown needle (MB). The end points of the study were (1) wheal and flare response of each device, with a dose-response curve, (2) the time required to apply each set of eight tests, and (3) the volunteers' subjective assessment of each device. On a different day, 10 of the volunteers were tested to determine the precision of each device. Dose-response curves for half-log dilutions of histamine phosphate were produced with a glycerosaline control. The DP and GP induced wheal and flare responses discernible from that of the glycerosaline control at a lower concentration of histamine phosphate than the MB and MT. The DP took a shorter time to apply eight samples than any other device. The MB was preferred by the most volunteers, but any device tested on the upper half of the back was usually preferred over that tested on the lower half. When 5 mg ml histamine phosphate was used, coefficients of variation for each device demonstrated that for wheals the precision of the DP, GP, and MT was similar (mean, 21.1{\%}, 23.1{\%}, and 24.5{\%}, respectively). The MB was larger (mean, 59.9{\%}). For flares, the precision of GP and DP was similar (mean, 22.0{\%} and 23.5{\%}, respectively), with the MT and MB larger (mean, 35.5{\%} and 58.@{\%}, respectively). Repeating the analysis for the MB with 10 mg ml histamine phosphate, we found a mean coefficient of variation of 16.5{\%} for wheals and 19.6{\%} for flares. We conclude that the DP is equal to the GP in precision and sensitivity for wheal and flare, but it has the advantage of allowing allergy skin testing to be performed more quickly. The MT has similar precision for wheals but has less precision for flares. The MB device is more precise only with higher concentrations of histamine phosphate than those routinely used in the clinical practice of allergy.",
keywords = "allergy testing, histamine, Skin testing",
author = "Engler, {David B.} and DeJarnatt, {Alan C.} and Sim, {Tommy C.} and Lee, {Jana L.} and Grant, {J. Andrew}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0091-6749(92)90472-E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "985--991",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0091-6749",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices

AU - Engler, David B.

AU - DeJarnatt, Alan C.

AU - Sim, Tommy C.

AU - Lee, Jana L.

AU - Grant, J. Andrew

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Twenty volunteers were skin tested with seven concentrations of histamine phosphate and a glycerosaline control to determine the relative sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices Greer Pen (GP), Greer DermaPIK (DP), Center Multi-Test (MT), and Morrow Brown needle (MB). The end points of the study were (1) wheal and flare response of each device, with a dose-response curve, (2) the time required to apply each set of eight tests, and (3) the volunteers' subjective assessment of each device. On a different day, 10 of the volunteers were tested to determine the precision of each device. Dose-response curves for half-log dilutions of histamine phosphate were produced with a glycerosaline control. The DP and GP induced wheal and flare responses discernible from that of the glycerosaline control at a lower concentration of histamine phosphate than the MB and MT. The DP took a shorter time to apply eight samples than any other device. The MB was preferred by the most volunteers, but any device tested on the upper half of the back was usually preferred over that tested on the lower half. When 5 mg ml histamine phosphate was used, coefficients of variation for each device demonstrated that for wheals the precision of the DP, GP, and MT was similar (mean, 21.1%, 23.1%, and 24.5%, respectively). The MB was larger (mean, 59.9%). For flares, the precision of GP and DP was similar (mean, 22.0% and 23.5%, respectively), with the MT and MB larger (mean, 35.5% and 58.@%, respectively). Repeating the analysis for the MB with 10 mg ml histamine phosphate, we found a mean coefficient of variation of 16.5% for wheals and 19.6% for flares. We conclude that the DP is equal to the GP in precision and sensitivity for wheal and flare, but it has the advantage of allowing allergy skin testing to be performed more quickly. The MT has similar precision for wheals but has less precision for flares. The MB device is more precise only with higher concentrations of histamine phosphate than those routinely used in the clinical practice of allergy.

AB - Twenty volunteers were skin tested with seven concentrations of histamine phosphate and a glycerosaline control to determine the relative sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices Greer Pen (GP), Greer DermaPIK (DP), Center Multi-Test (MT), and Morrow Brown needle (MB). The end points of the study were (1) wheal and flare response of each device, with a dose-response curve, (2) the time required to apply each set of eight tests, and (3) the volunteers' subjective assessment of each device. On a different day, 10 of the volunteers were tested to determine the precision of each device. Dose-response curves for half-log dilutions of histamine phosphate were produced with a glycerosaline control. The DP and GP induced wheal and flare responses discernible from that of the glycerosaline control at a lower concentration of histamine phosphate than the MB and MT. The DP took a shorter time to apply eight samples than any other device. The MB was preferred by the most volunteers, but any device tested on the upper half of the back was usually preferred over that tested on the lower half. When 5 mg ml histamine phosphate was used, coefficients of variation for each device demonstrated that for wheals the precision of the DP, GP, and MT was similar (mean, 21.1%, 23.1%, and 24.5%, respectively). The MB was larger (mean, 59.9%). For flares, the precision of GP and DP was similar (mean, 22.0% and 23.5%, respectively), with the MT and MB larger (mean, 35.5% and 58.@%, respectively). Repeating the analysis for the MB with 10 mg ml histamine phosphate, we found a mean coefficient of variation of 16.5% for wheals and 19.6% for flares. We conclude that the DP is equal to the GP in precision and sensitivity for wheal and flare, but it has the advantage of allowing allergy skin testing to be performed more quickly. The MT has similar precision for wheals but has less precision for flares. The MB device is more precise only with higher concentrations of histamine phosphate than those routinely used in the clinical practice of allergy.

KW - allergy testing

KW - histamine

KW - Skin testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027092357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027092357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0091-6749(92)90472-E

DO - 10.1016/0091-6749(92)90472-E

M3 - Article

C2 - 1460202

AN - SCOPUS:0027092357

VL - 90

SP - 985

EP - 991

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0091-6749

IS - 6 PART 1

ER -