Confidence levels can broaden the application of clinical research findings and promote evidence-based practice

James E. Graham, Timothy Reistetter, Trudy R. Mallinson, Kenneth Ottenbacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The traditional method of presenting quantitative research findings based on the statistical results of null hypothesis testing can limit the ability of clinicians and consumers to trans-late research findings into meaningful information for treatment planning and evaluation. In this article, the authors compare results from an illustrative study based on traditional statistical methods, including a t test and p values, to a more clinically useful approach using confidence levels. The process of calculating confidence levels using the basic quanti-tative information included in most clinical research articles is described. The argument is made that confidence levels do not replace traditional (null) hypothesis testing. Rather, they facilitate the interpretation of statistical findings, improve clinical decision making, and support the development of evidence-based occupational therapy practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-104
Number of pages6
JournalOTJR Occupation, Participation and Health
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2009

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Research
Occupational Therapy
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Confidence levels can broaden the application of clinical research findings and promote evidence-based practice. / Graham, James E.; Reistetter, Timothy; Mallinson, Trudy R.; Ottenbacher, Kenneth.

In: OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, Vol. 29, No. 3, 06.2009, p. 99-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{412eb79001594823beffc42ad2a407f0,
title = "Confidence levels can broaden the application of clinical research findings and promote evidence-based practice",
abstract = "The traditional method of presenting quantitative research findings based on the statistical results of null hypothesis testing can limit the ability of clinicians and consumers to trans-late research findings into meaningful information for treatment planning and evaluation. In this article, the authors compare results from an illustrative study based on traditional statistical methods, including a t test and p values, to a more clinically useful approach using confidence levels. The process of calculating confidence levels using the basic quanti-tative information included in most clinical research articles is described. The argument is made that confidence levels do not replace traditional (null) hypothesis testing. Rather, they facilitate the interpretation of statistical findings, improve clinical decision making, and support the development of evidence-based occupational therapy practice.",
author = "Graham, {James E.} and Timothy Reistetter and Mallinson, {Trudy R.} and Kenneth Ottenbacher",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
doi = "10.3928/15394492-20090611-02",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "99--104",
journal = "OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health",
issn = "1539-4492",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Confidence levels can broaden the application of clinical research findings and promote evidence-based practice

AU - Graham, James E.

AU - Reistetter, Timothy

AU - Mallinson, Trudy R.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth

PY - 2009/6

Y1 - 2009/6

N2 - The traditional method of presenting quantitative research findings based on the statistical results of null hypothesis testing can limit the ability of clinicians and consumers to trans-late research findings into meaningful information for treatment planning and evaluation. In this article, the authors compare results from an illustrative study based on traditional statistical methods, including a t test and p values, to a more clinically useful approach using confidence levels. The process of calculating confidence levels using the basic quanti-tative information included in most clinical research articles is described. The argument is made that confidence levels do not replace traditional (null) hypothesis testing. Rather, they facilitate the interpretation of statistical findings, improve clinical decision making, and support the development of evidence-based occupational therapy practice.

AB - The traditional method of presenting quantitative research findings based on the statistical results of null hypothesis testing can limit the ability of clinicians and consumers to trans-late research findings into meaningful information for treatment planning and evaluation. In this article, the authors compare results from an illustrative study based on traditional statistical methods, including a t test and p values, to a more clinically useful approach using confidence levels. The process of calculating confidence levels using the basic quanti-tative information included in most clinical research articles is described. The argument is made that confidence levels do not replace traditional (null) hypothesis testing. Rather, they facilitate the interpretation of statistical findings, improve clinical decision making, and support the development of evidence-based occupational therapy practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74049130344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74049130344&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3928/15394492-20090611-02

DO - 10.3928/15394492-20090611-02

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:74049130344

VL - 29

SP - 99

EP - 104

JO - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

JF - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

SN - 1539-4492

IS - 3

ER -