Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP

Jana Dejesus, Keenan Horani, Kush Brahmbhatt, Camila Franco Mesa, Sarah Samreen, Jennifer M. Moffett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Given the increasing interest for surgeons to reclaim the common bile duct in managing choledocholithiasis, there is a growing movement to perform common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Advantages of concomitant CBDE with cholecystectomy include fewer anesthetic events and decreased length of stay. As there is a paucity of literature evaluating the use of the robotic platform for CBDE, our study aims to compare intraoperative and post-operative outcomes between robotic-assisted one-stage and two-stage management of choledocholithiasis. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from May 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, identifying patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and transcystic CBDE with choledochoscopy (one-stage management). Preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative variables were compared to a control group of subjects with choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with pre- or post-operative ERCP (two-stage management). Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, Student’s T, or Mann–Whitney test. Results: Fifty-three subjects who underwent one-stage management and 101 subjects who underwent two-stage management met inclusion criteria. Groups had similar demographics and medical history. Time to CBD clearance (45.2 h vs 47.0 h, p =.036), total length of stay (3.9 days vs 5.1 days, p =.007), fluoroscopy time (70.3 s vs 151.4 s, p <.001), and estimated radiation dose (23.0 mSv vs 40.3 mSv, p =.002) were significantly lower in the one-stage group compared to two-stage. Clearance rates, complication rates, and 30-day readmission rates were similar for both groups. Total length of stay and radiation exposure remained significantly lower on subanalysis comparing one-stage management to two-stage management with ERCP either before or after cholecystectomy. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy with transcystic common bile duct exploration via choledochoscopy is a safe and feasible option in the management of choledocholithiasis. It offers a shorter time to duct clearance, shorter length of stay, and less radiation exposure when compared to two-stage management. Graphical Abstract: (Figure presented.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7552-7562
Number of pages11
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume38
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CBDE
  • Choledocholithiasis
  • Choledochoscopy
  • ERCP
  • Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Robotic surgery
  • Transcystic common bile duct exploration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this