Conscientious objection and LGBTQ discrimination in the United States

Abram Brummett, Lisa Campo-Engelstein

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    5 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Given recent legal developments in the United States, now is a critical time to draw attention to how ‘conscientious objection’ is sometimes used by health care providers to discriminate against the LGBTQ community. We review legal developments from 2019 and present several cases where health care providers used conscientious objection in ways that discriminate against the LGBTQ community, resulting in damaged trust by this underserved population. We then discuss two important conceptual points in this debate. The first involves the interpretation of discrimination (provider versus patient-centered views), and we argue for a patient-centered view; the second involves the use of the people versus procedure distinction to reach a compromise between LGBTQ individuals and the clinicians who do not want to treat them. We argue the distinction is problematic when applied to treatment of the LGBTQ population.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)322-330
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Public Health Policy
    Volume42
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2021

    Keywords

    • Conscientious objection
    • Discrimination
    • Healthcare access
    • LGBTQ rights

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health Policy
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conscientious objection and LGBTQ discrimination in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this