TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical wound infections
AU - Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America, for Hospital Epidemiology of America
AU - Sherertz, Robert J.
AU - Garibaldi, Richard A.
AU - Marosok, Randy D.
AU - Glen Mayhall, C.
AU - Scheckler, William E.
AU - Berg, Rosemary
AU - Centers for Disease Control, for Disease Control
AU - Gaynes, Robert P.
AU - Jarvis, William R.
AU - Martone, William J.
AU - Surgical Infection Society, Infection Society
AU - Lee, James T.
PY - 1992/10
Y1 - 1992/10
N2 - A Surgical Wound Infection Task Force was convened by the Society of Hospital Epidemiology of America to evaluate how surgical wound infection surveillance should be done and to identify where more information is needed. The task force reached consensus in the following areas. The Centers for Disease Control definitions of surgical wound infection should be used for routine surveillance because of their current widespread acceptance and reproducibility. The Centers for Disease Control defintions are clarified in an accompanying article. Direct observation of wounds and traditional infection control surveillance techniques are acceptable methods of case finding for hospitalized patients. The optimal method for case finding after discharge or after outpatient surgery is unknown at this time. Surgical wound infection rates should be stratified by surgical wound class plus a measure of patient susceptibility to infection, such as the American Society of Anesthesiology class, and duration of surgery. Surgeon-specific surgical wound infection rates should be calculated and reported to individual surgeons.
AB - A Surgical Wound Infection Task Force was convened by the Society of Hospital Epidemiology of America to evaluate how surgical wound infection surveillance should be done and to identify where more information is needed. The task force reached consensus in the following areas. The Centers for Disease Control definitions of surgical wound infection should be used for routine surveillance because of their current widespread acceptance and reproducibility. The Centers for Disease Control defintions are clarified in an accompanying article. Direct observation of wounds and traditional infection control surveillance techniques are acceptable methods of case finding for hospitalized patients. The optimal method for case finding after discharge or after outpatient surgery is unknown at this time. Surgical wound infection rates should be stratified by surgical wound class plus a measure of patient susceptibility to infection, such as the American Society of Anesthesiology class, and duration of surgery. Surgeon-specific surgical wound infection rates should be calculated and reported to individual surgeons.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026442115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026442115&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80200-7
DO - 10.1016/S0196-6553(05)80200-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0026442115
SN - 0196-6553
VL - 20
SP - 263
EP - 270
JO - AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
JF - AJIC: American Journal of Infection Control
IS - 5
ER -