Consensus Paper on the Surveillance of Surgical Wound Infections

C. Glen Mayhall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

195 Scopus citations


A Surgical Wound Infection (SWI) Task Force was convened by The Society for Hospital Epidemiology of America (SHEA) to evaluate how SWI surveillance should be done and to identify where more information is needed. The Task Force reached consensus in the following areas. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) definitions of SWI should be used for routine surveillance because of their current widespread acceptance and reproducibility. The CDC definitions have been clarified in an accompanying article (“Report From the CDC”). Direct observation of wounds and traditional infection control surveillance techniques are acceptable methods of case finding for hospitalized patients. The optimal method for case finding postdischarge or after outpatient surgery is unknown at this time. SWI rates should be stratified by surgical wound class plus a measure of patient susceptibility to infection, such as the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, and duration of surgery Surgeon-specific SWI rates should be calculated and reported to individual surgeons. (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:599-605.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)599-605
Number of pages7
JournalInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1992
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases


Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus Paper on the Surveillance of Surgical Wound Infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this