Consistently Inconsistent: Does Inconsistency Really Indicate Incapacity?

Bryanna Moore, Ryan H. Nelson, Nicole Meredyth, Nekee Pandya

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

While it is not explicitly included in capacity assessment tools, “consistency” has come to feature as a central concern when assessing patients’ capacity. In order to determine whether inconsistency indicates incapacity, clinicians must determine the source of the inconsistency with respect to the process or content of a patient’s decision-making. In this paper, we outline common types of inconsistency and analyze them against widely accepted elements of capacity. We explore the question of whether inconsistency necessarily entails a deficiency in a patient’s capacity. While inconsistency may count as primafacie evidence of incapacity—enough evidence to justify a closer look—when making such determinations, it is important for clinicians to slow down, inquire about the reasons underlying the inconsistency and clearly show which of the elements of capacity the patient fails to satisfy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHEC Forum
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2021

Keywords

  • Capacity
  • Competency
  • Ethics consultation
  • Informed consent
  • Medical decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consistently Inconsistent: Does Inconsistency Really Indicate Incapacity?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this