Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
UTMB Health Research Expert Profiles Home
Help & FAQ
Search content at UTMB Health Research Expert Profiles
Home
Experts
Departments
Equipment
Projects/Grants
Publications
Activities
Press/Media
Honors
Impacts
Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)
Janina Wilmskoetter
, Heather Bonilha
, Ickpyo Hong
, R. Jordan Hazelwood
, Bonnie Martin-Harris
, Craig Velozo
Rehabilitation Sciences
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
53
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Construct validity of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Construct Validity
100%
Eating Assessment Tool
100%
EAT-10
100%
Functional Oral Intake Scale
37%
Clinical Research
25%
Clinical Practice
25%
Rating Scales
25%
Frequent Use
25%
Penetration-aspiration Scale
25%
Pneumonia
12%
Malnutrition
12%
Psychological Burden
12%
Response to Treatment
12%
Retrospective Analysis
12%
Severe Complications
12%
Differential Item Functioning
12%
Patient Cohort
12%
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
12%
Rasch
12%
Self-report Instrument
12%
Social Burden
12%
Rasch Model
12%
Person Reliability
12%
Misfit
12%
Rasch Measurement
12%
Unidimensionality
12%
Dysphagia Symptoms
12%
Swallowing Disorders
12%
Dysphagia Severity
12%
Airway Invasion
12%
Medicine and Dentistry
Plummer-Vinson Syndrome
100%
Oral
100%
Rasch Analysis
66%
Rating Scale
66%
Self Report
33%
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
33%
Nursing and Health Professions
Construct Validity
100%
Dysphagia
75%
Clinical Practice
50%
Rasch Analysis
50%
Rating Scale
50%
Self Report
25%
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
25%
Psychology
Construct Validity
100%
Rating Scale
50%
Rasch Analysis
50%
Self-Report
25%
Factor Analysis
25%
Rasch Model
25%
Food Science
Malnutrition
100%