Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel: The importance of side in clinical practice

Faidon Magkos, Yannis Manios, Eirini Babaroutsi, Labros S. Sidossis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is becoming increasingly popular for the assessment of skeletal status, although there appears to be a general lack of agreement regarding which side to measure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate possible side differences (right versus left) in heel QUS within the general population, including children (10-15 years old, n=406), adults (26-33 years old, n=339), and elderly subjects (60-75 years old, n=455) of both genders (818 females and 382 males), and to examine the impact of these differences on prevalence estimates of osteoporosis and individual fracture risk assessment. All participants had both their heels measured twice with the Sahara device, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) through the os calcis; a composite parameter, that is, quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) and an estimate of heel BMD (eBMD) were also derived. Significant side differences were detected for BUA and SOS (P<0.05), but not for QUI or eBMD. Contralateral differences were rather small in absolute terms, but were in the order of 12.6% for BUA, 0.72% for SOS, 7.9% for QUI, and 9.9% for eBMD, when expressed as percentage of the mean values for the two heels. Bilateral differences appeared to vary across age and gender. Significant correlations between QUS indices of the right and left heel were observed (r=0.75-0.85; P<0.001), which seemed to be stronger among the elderly and among male individuals. Prevalence rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis were not significantly different when estimated from eBMD T-scores for the one or the other foot (χ2 =1.781, df=2, P=0.410). However, cross-classification analysis revealed that only 84% of the subjects classified into each risk category by the two calcanei were actually the same persons. In conclusion, results from the present study strongly suggest that QUS measurements of opposite heels may not be equivalent with respect to the evaluation of bone status and classification of individual fracture risk assessment, although the degree of discrepancy appears to be related to the primary outcome of interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)879-886
Number of pages8
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume16
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heel
Osteoporosis
Northern Africa
Calcaneus
Metabolic Bone Diseases
Foot
Bone and Bones
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Age
  • Bilateral
  • Calcaneus
  • Gender
  • Left
  • Osteoporosis
  • Quantitative ultrasound
  • Right
  • Side differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel : The importance of side in clinical practice. / Magkos, Faidon; Manios, Yannis; Babaroutsi, Eirini; Sidossis, Labros S.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 16, No. 8, 07.2005, p. 879-886.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Magkos, Faidon ; Manios, Yannis ; Babaroutsi, Eirini ; Sidossis, Labros S. / Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel : The importance of side in clinical practice. In: Osteoporosis International. 2005 ; Vol. 16, No. 8. pp. 879-886.
@article{a192d64567c5471c87ece5705c844922,
title = "Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel: The importance of side in clinical practice",
abstract = "Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is becoming increasingly popular for the assessment of skeletal status, although there appears to be a general lack of agreement regarding which side to measure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate possible side differences (right versus left) in heel QUS within the general population, including children (10-15 years old, n=406), adults (26-33 years old, n=339), and elderly subjects (60-75 years old, n=455) of both genders (818 females and 382 males), and to examine the impact of these differences on prevalence estimates of osteoporosis and individual fracture risk assessment. All participants had both their heels measured twice with the Sahara device, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) through the os calcis; a composite parameter, that is, quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) and an estimate of heel BMD (eBMD) were also derived. Significant side differences were detected for BUA and SOS (P<0.05), but not for QUI or eBMD. Contralateral differences were rather small in absolute terms, but were in the order of 12.6{\%} for BUA, 0.72{\%} for SOS, 7.9{\%} for QUI, and 9.9{\%} for eBMD, when expressed as percentage of the mean values for the two heels. Bilateral differences appeared to vary across age and gender. Significant correlations between QUS indices of the right and left heel were observed (r=0.75-0.85; P<0.001), which seemed to be stronger among the elderly and among male individuals. Prevalence rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis were not significantly different when estimated from eBMD T-scores for the one or the other foot (χ2 =1.781, df=2, P=0.410). However, cross-classification analysis revealed that only 84{\%} of the subjects classified into each risk category by the two calcanei were actually the same persons. In conclusion, results from the present study strongly suggest that QUS measurements of opposite heels may not be equivalent with respect to the evaluation of bone status and classification of individual fracture risk assessment, although the degree of discrepancy appears to be related to the primary outcome of interest.",
keywords = "Age, Bilateral, Calcaneus, Gender, Left, Osteoporosis, Quantitative ultrasound, Right, Side differences",
author = "Faidon Magkos and Yannis Manios and Eirini Babaroutsi and Sidossis, {Labros S.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-004-1761-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "879--886",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel

T2 - The importance of side in clinical practice

AU - Magkos, Faidon

AU - Manios, Yannis

AU - Babaroutsi, Eirini

AU - Sidossis, Labros S.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is becoming increasingly popular for the assessment of skeletal status, although there appears to be a general lack of agreement regarding which side to measure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate possible side differences (right versus left) in heel QUS within the general population, including children (10-15 years old, n=406), adults (26-33 years old, n=339), and elderly subjects (60-75 years old, n=455) of both genders (818 females and 382 males), and to examine the impact of these differences on prevalence estimates of osteoporosis and individual fracture risk assessment. All participants had both their heels measured twice with the Sahara device, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) through the os calcis; a composite parameter, that is, quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) and an estimate of heel BMD (eBMD) were also derived. Significant side differences were detected for BUA and SOS (P<0.05), but not for QUI or eBMD. Contralateral differences were rather small in absolute terms, but were in the order of 12.6% for BUA, 0.72% for SOS, 7.9% for QUI, and 9.9% for eBMD, when expressed as percentage of the mean values for the two heels. Bilateral differences appeared to vary across age and gender. Significant correlations between QUS indices of the right and left heel were observed (r=0.75-0.85; P<0.001), which seemed to be stronger among the elderly and among male individuals. Prevalence rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis were not significantly different when estimated from eBMD T-scores for the one or the other foot (χ2 =1.781, df=2, P=0.410). However, cross-classification analysis revealed that only 84% of the subjects classified into each risk category by the two calcanei were actually the same persons. In conclusion, results from the present study strongly suggest that QUS measurements of opposite heels may not be equivalent with respect to the evaluation of bone status and classification of individual fracture risk assessment, although the degree of discrepancy appears to be related to the primary outcome of interest.

AB - Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is becoming increasingly popular for the assessment of skeletal status, although there appears to be a general lack of agreement regarding which side to measure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate possible side differences (right versus left) in heel QUS within the general population, including children (10-15 years old, n=406), adults (26-33 years old, n=339), and elderly subjects (60-75 years old, n=455) of both genders (818 females and 382 males), and to examine the impact of these differences on prevalence estimates of osteoporosis and individual fracture risk assessment. All participants had both their heels measured twice with the Sahara device, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) through the os calcis; a composite parameter, that is, quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) and an estimate of heel BMD (eBMD) were also derived. Significant side differences were detected for BUA and SOS (P<0.05), but not for QUI or eBMD. Contralateral differences were rather small in absolute terms, but were in the order of 12.6% for BUA, 0.72% for SOS, 7.9% for QUI, and 9.9% for eBMD, when expressed as percentage of the mean values for the two heels. Bilateral differences appeared to vary across age and gender. Significant correlations between QUS indices of the right and left heel were observed (r=0.75-0.85; P<0.001), which seemed to be stronger among the elderly and among male individuals. Prevalence rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis were not significantly different when estimated from eBMD T-scores for the one or the other foot (χ2 =1.781, df=2, P=0.410). However, cross-classification analysis revealed that only 84% of the subjects classified into each risk category by the two calcanei were actually the same persons. In conclusion, results from the present study strongly suggest that QUS measurements of opposite heels may not be equivalent with respect to the evaluation of bone status and classification of individual fracture risk assessment, although the degree of discrepancy appears to be related to the primary outcome of interest.

KW - Age

KW - Bilateral

KW - Calcaneus

KW - Gender

KW - Left

KW - Osteoporosis

KW - Quantitative ultrasound

KW - Right

KW - Side differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23744502661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23744502661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-004-1761-8

DO - 10.1007/s00198-004-1761-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 15586269

AN - SCOPUS:23744502661

VL - 16

SP - 879

EP - 886

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 8

ER -