Coronary flow capacity and survival prediction after revascularization: physiological basis and clinical implications

  • K. Lance Gould
  • , Nils P. Johnson
  • , Amanda E. Roby
  • , Linh Bui
  • , Danai Kitkungvan
  • , Monica B. Patel
  • , Tung Nguyen
  • , Richard Kirkeeide
  • , Mary Haynie
  • , Salman A. Arain
  • , Konstantinos Charitakis
  • , Abhijeet Dhoble
  • , Richard Smalling
  • , Angelo Nascimbene
  • , Marwan Jumean
  • , Sachin Kumar
  • , Biswajit Kar
  • , Stefano Sdringola
  • , Anthony Estrera
  • , Igor Gregoric
  • Dejian Lai, Ruosha Li, David McPherson, Jagat Narula

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Coronary flow capacity (CFC) is associated with an observed 10-year survival probability for individual patients before and Aims after actual revascularization for comparison to virtual hypothetical ideal complete revascularization. Methods Stress myocardial perfusion (mL/min/g) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) per pixel were quantified in 6979 coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects using Rb-82 positron emission tomography (PET) for CFC maps of artery-specific size-severity abnormalities expressed as percent left ventricle with prospective follow-up to define survival probability per-decade as fraction of 1.0. Results Severely reduced CFC in 6979 subjects predicted low survival probability that improved by 42% after revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable severity (P = .0015). For 283 pre-and-post-procedure PET pairs, severely reduced regional CFC-associated survival probability improved heterogeneously after revascularization (P < .001), more so after bypass surgery than percutaneous coronary interventions (P < .001) but normalized in only 5.7%; non-severe baseline CFC or survival probability did not improve compared with severe CFC (P = .00001). Observed CFC-associated survival probability after actual revascularization was lower than virtual ideal hypothetical complete post-revascularization survival probability due to residual CAD or failed revascularization (P < .001) unrelated to gender or microvascular dysfunction. Severely reduced CFC in 2552 post-revascularization subjects associated with low survival probability also improved after repeat revascularization compared with no repeat procedures (P = .025). Conclusions Severely reduced CFC and associated observed survival probability improved after first and repeat revascularization compared with no revascularization for comparable CFC severity. Non-severe CFC showed no benefit. Discordance between observed actual and virtual hypothetical post-revascularization survival probability revealed residual CAD or failed revascularization.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)181-194
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 14 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Coronary bypass surgery
  • Coronary flow reserve
  • Myocardial ischaemia
  • Myocardial perfusion
  • PET imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary flow capacity and survival prediction after revascularization: physiological basis and clinical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this