Correlations Between a Dedicated Orthopaedic Complications Grading System and Early Adverse Outcomes in Joint Arthroplasty

Dorothy Y. Harris, Jillian K. McAngus, Yong Fang Kuo, Ronald Lindsey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Reliable classification of postoperative complications is important for quality improvement efforts. In 2014, The Knee Society proposed a grading system for complications after TKA, but to our knowledge, a relationship between complication grades and surgical outcomes has not yet been established. Questions/purposes: We attempted to determine (1) whether an association exists between complication grade and early adverse outcomes after TKA and THA, and (2) what proportion of the variability in complications could be associated with the classification grade (a metric of potential predictive value of the grading schema). Methods: A total of 210 primary THAs and TKAs in 201 patients performed at one center from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 were reviewed; of those, 188 patients (94%; 197 procedures) had complete 90-day postoperative data and were evaluated retrospectively for postoperative complications. We defined and graded complications according to the classification system proposed by Iorio et al. and The Knee Society. Early adverse outcomes assessed included length of hospital stay and unplanned readmissions or reoperations. A total of 254 complications were documented in 135 patients (137 procedures); 53 patients (60 procedures) had no complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify associations between complication grade and early adverse outcomes and patient variables; analyses considered patient variables including age, sex, status as a state prisoner (yes or no), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, BMI, and procedure (TKA or THA). Multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between complication grade and early adverse outcomes (length of stay [LOS] and unplanned readmission or reoperations) adjusted for confounding patient variables. Alpha was set at 0.05 for two-sided tests. Results: Maximum complication grade (range, from 0–4) was associated with a longer LOS (for each point increase of maximum grade, LOS increased 0.105 ± 0.024 days, p < 0.001) and more readmissions or reoperations (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.91–7.54; p < 0.001). Total grade (range, 0–22) also was associated with increased LOS (for each point increase of total grade, LOS increased 0.032 ± 0.006 days, p < 0.001) and increased readmissions or reoperations (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18–1.53; p < 0.001). Total grade could account for 38% of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90–0.98); whereas maximum complication grade could account for 35% of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.88–0.96). Thus, we found total grade to be a slightly better predictor of LOS and readmissions or reoperations than maximum grade. Conclusions: We found that the proposed grading system is applicable to TKA and THA in terms of documentation of complication severity and as an indicator of increased LOS and increased unplanned readmissions or reoperation rates. That total complication grade was a better predictor of LOS than maximum grade suggests that multiple complications of a lesser grade can be just as important as a single higher grade complication in terms of effect on outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1524-1531
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume473
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Orthopedics
Length of Stay
Joints
Reoperation
Tacrine
Odds Ratio
Prisoners
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Quality Improvement
Documentation
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Correlations Between a Dedicated Orthopaedic Complications Grading System and Early Adverse Outcomes in Joint Arthroplasty. / Harris, Dorothy Y.; McAngus, Jillian K.; Kuo, Yong Fang; Lindsey, Ronald.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 473, No. 4, 2015, p. 1524-1531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{22552c7cb76c4f699dba54753318c4b0,
title = "Correlations Between a Dedicated Orthopaedic Complications Grading System and Early Adverse Outcomes in Joint Arthroplasty",
abstract = "Background: Reliable classification of postoperative complications is important for quality improvement efforts. In 2014, The Knee Society proposed a grading system for complications after TKA, but to our knowledge, a relationship between complication grades and surgical outcomes has not yet been established. Questions/purposes: We attempted to determine (1) whether an association exists between complication grade and early adverse outcomes after TKA and THA, and (2) what proportion of the variability in complications could be associated with the classification grade (a metric of potential predictive value of the grading schema). Methods: A total of 210 primary THAs and TKAs in 201 patients performed at one center from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 were reviewed; of those, 188 patients (94{\%}; 197 procedures) had complete 90-day postoperative data and were evaluated retrospectively for postoperative complications. We defined and graded complications according to the classification system proposed by Iorio et al. and The Knee Society. Early adverse outcomes assessed included length of hospital stay and unplanned readmissions or reoperations. A total of 254 complications were documented in 135 patients (137 procedures); 53 patients (60 procedures) had no complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify associations between complication grade and early adverse outcomes and patient variables; analyses considered patient variables including age, sex, status as a state prisoner (yes or no), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, BMI, and procedure (TKA or THA). Multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between complication grade and early adverse outcomes (length of stay [LOS] and unplanned readmission or reoperations) adjusted for confounding patient variables. Alpha was set at 0.05 for two-sided tests. Results: Maximum complication grade (range, from 0–4) was associated with a longer LOS (for each point increase of maximum grade, LOS increased 0.105 ± 0.024 days, p < 0.001) and more readmissions or reoperations (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95{\%} CI, 1.91–7.54; p < 0.001). Total grade (range, 0–22) also was associated with increased LOS (for each point increase of total grade, LOS increased 0.032 ± 0.006 days, p < 0.001) and increased readmissions or reoperations (OR, 1.34; 95{\%} CI, 1.18–1.53; p < 0.001). Total grade could account for 38{\%} of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.94; 95{\%} CI, 0.90–0.98); whereas maximum complication grade could account for 35{\%} of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.35; 95{\%} CI, 0.88–0.96). Thus, we found total grade to be a slightly better predictor of LOS and readmissions or reoperations than maximum grade. Conclusions: We found that the proposed grading system is applicable to TKA and THA in terms of documentation of complication severity and as an indicator of increased LOS and increased unplanned readmissions or reoperation rates. That total complication grade was a better predictor of LOS than maximum grade suggests that multiple complications of a lesser grade can be just as important as a single higher grade complication in terms of effect on outcomes.",
author = "Harris, {Dorothy Y.} and McAngus, {Jillian K.} and Kuo, {Yong Fang} and Ronald Lindsey",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s11999-014-4058-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "473",
pages = "1524--1531",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correlations Between a Dedicated Orthopaedic Complications Grading System and Early Adverse Outcomes in Joint Arthroplasty

AU - Harris, Dorothy Y.

AU - McAngus, Jillian K.

AU - Kuo, Yong Fang

AU - Lindsey, Ronald

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: Reliable classification of postoperative complications is important for quality improvement efforts. In 2014, The Knee Society proposed a grading system for complications after TKA, but to our knowledge, a relationship between complication grades and surgical outcomes has not yet been established. Questions/purposes: We attempted to determine (1) whether an association exists between complication grade and early adverse outcomes after TKA and THA, and (2) what proportion of the variability in complications could be associated with the classification grade (a metric of potential predictive value of the grading schema). Methods: A total of 210 primary THAs and TKAs in 201 patients performed at one center from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 were reviewed; of those, 188 patients (94%; 197 procedures) had complete 90-day postoperative data and were evaluated retrospectively for postoperative complications. We defined and graded complications according to the classification system proposed by Iorio et al. and The Knee Society. Early adverse outcomes assessed included length of hospital stay and unplanned readmissions or reoperations. A total of 254 complications were documented in 135 patients (137 procedures); 53 patients (60 procedures) had no complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify associations between complication grade and early adverse outcomes and patient variables; analyses considered patient variables including age, sex, status as a state prisoner (yes or no), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, BMI, and procedure (TKA or THA). Multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between complication grade and early adverse outcomes (length of stay [LOS] and unplanned readmission or reoperations) adjusted for confounding patient variables. Alpha was set at 0.05 for two-sided tests. Results: Maximum complication grade (range, from 0–4) was associated with a longer LOS (for each point increase of maximum grade, LOS increased 0.105 ± 0.024 days, p < 0.001) and more readmissions or reoperations (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.91–7.54; p < 0.001). Total grade (range, 0–22) also was associated with increased LOS (for each point increase of total grade, LOS increased 0.032 ± 0.006 days, p < 0.001) and increased readmissions or reoperations (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18–1.53; p < 0.001). Total grade could account for 38% of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90–0.98); whereas maximum complication grade could account for 35% of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.88–0.96). Thus, we found total grade to be a slightly better predictor of LOS and readmissions or reoperations than maximum grade. Conclusions: We found that the proposed grading system is applicable to TKA and THA in terms of documentation of complication severity and as an indicator of increased LOS and increased unplanned readmissions or reoperation rates. That total complication grade was a better predictor of LOS than maximum grade suggests that multiple complications of a lesser grade can be just as important as a single higher grade complication in terms of effect on outcomes.

AB - Background: Reliable classification of postoperative complications is important for quality improvement efforts. In 2014, The Knee Society proposed a grading system for complications after TKA, but to our knowledge, a relationship between complication grades and surgical outcomes has not yet been established. Questions/purposes: We attempted to determine (1) whether an association exists between complication grade and early adverse outcomes after TKA and THA, and (2) what proportion of the variability in complications could be associated with the classification grade (a metric of potential predictive value of the grading schema). Methods: A total of 210 primary THAs and TKAs in 201 patients performed at one center from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 were reviewed; of those, 188 patients (94%; 197 procedures) had complete 90-day postoperative data and were evaluated retrospectively for postoperative complications. We defined and graded complications according to the classification system proposed by Iorio et al. and The Knee Society. Early adverse outcomes assessed included length of hospital stay and unplanned readmissions or reoperations. A total of 254 complications were documented in 135 patients (137 procedures); 53 patients (60 procedures) had no complications. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify associations between complication grade and early adverse outcomes and patient variables; analyses considered patient variables including age, sex, status as a state prisoner (yes or no), American Society of Anesthesiologists score, BMI, and procedure (TKA or THA). Multiple regression and logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between complication grade and early adverse outcomes (length of stay [LOS] and unplanned readmission or reoperations) adjusted for confounding patient variables. Alpha was set at 0.05 for two-sided tests. Results: Maximum complication grade (range, from 0–4) was associated with a longer LOS (for each point increase of maximum grade, LOS increased 0.105 ± 0.024 days, p < 0.001) and more readmissions or reoperations (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.91–7.54; p < 0.001). Total grade (range, 0–22) also was associated with increased LOS (for each point increase of total grade, LOS increased 0.032 ± 0.006 days, p < 0.001) and increased readmissions or reoperations (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18–1.53; p < 0.001). Total grade could account for 38% of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90–0.98); whereas maximum complication grade could account for 35% of the variation in LOS and readmissions or reoperations (C-statistic = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.88–0.96). Thus, we found total grade to be a slightly better predictor of LOS and readmissions or reoperations than maximum grade. Conclusions: We found that the proposed grading system is applicable to TKA and THA in terms of documentation of complication severity and as an indicator of increased LOS and increased unplanned readmissions or reoperation rates. That total complication grade was a better predictor of LOS than maximum grade suggests that multiple complications of a lesser grade can be just as important as a single higher grade complication in terms of effect on outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925467270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925467270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11999-014-4058-z

DO - 10.1007/s11999-014-4058-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 25413712

AN - SCOPUS:84925467270

VL - 473

SP - 1524

EP - 1531

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 4

ER -