TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to
T2 - Rapid detection of Orthopoxvirus by semi-nested PCR directly from clinical specimens: A useful alternative for routine laboratories : Direct Detection of Orhopoxvirus by vgf Semi-Nested PCR (Journal of Medical Virology, (2010), 82, 4, (692-699), 10.1002/jmv.21617)
AU - Abrahão, Jônatas Santos
AU - Drumond, Betânia Paiva
AU - Trindade, Giliane de Souza
AU - Silva-Fernandes, André Tavares da
AU - Ferreira, Jaqueline Maria Siqueira
AU - Alves, Pedro Augusto
AU - Campos, Rafael Kroon
AU - Siqueira, Larissa
AU - Bonjardim, Cláudio Antônio
AU - Ferreira, Paulo César Peregrino
AU - Kroon, Erna Geessien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Rapid detection of Orthopoxvirus by semi-nested PCR directly from clinical specimens: A useful alternative for routine laboratories. The article to which this Corrigendum refers was published in Journal of Medical Virology 82:692–699 (2010). 1 While checking laboratory files related to the manuscript published at Journal of Medical Virology 82:692–699 (2010) we realized that we made a mistake during the preparation of Figure 2. Some components of the panel regarding the semi-nested PCR sensitivity assays (urine, without BSA) were inadvertently replaced by a wrong, duplicated figure. We prepared an updated version of Figure 2 panel including the correct gel image. The sensitivity of the semi-nested PCR in urine, without BSA, remains the same described in the paper (103 PFU). 2 Figure (Figure presented.) For this mistake, we would like to state our apologies.
AB - Rapid detection of Orthopoxvirus by semi-nested PCR directly from clinical specimens: A useful alternative for routine laboratories. The article to which this Corrigendum refers was published in Journal of Medical Virology 82:692–699 (2010). 1 While checking laboratory files related to the manuscript published at Journal of Medical Virology 82:692–699 (2010) we realized that we made a mistake during the preparation of Figure 2. Some components of the panel regarding the semi-nested PCR sensitivity assays (urine, without BSA) were inadvertently replaced by a wrong, duplicated figure. We prepared an updated version of Figure 2 panel including the correct gel image. The sensitivity of the semi-nested PCR in urine, without BSA, remains the same described in the paper (103 PFU). 2 Figure (Figure presented.) For this mistake, we would like to state our apologies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111360763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111360763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmv.27193
DO - 10.1002/jmv.27193
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 34251724
AN - SCOPUS:85111360763
SN - 0146-6615
VL - 93
SP - 6424
JO - Journal of Medical Virology
JF - Journal of Medical Virology
IS - 11
ER -