Abstract
The authors regret that some of the information regarding the BORARC trial was incorrect in the original manuscript. The trial was conducted in Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. For post-operative quality-of-life outcomes (Figure 6, updated version included below), Supplementary Figure 19 and 20, the number of participants in each randomisation arm is 25 pre-operatively and 24 post-operatively, not 50 and 48 respectively. In Figure 2, there were 25 patients randomized to robot-assisted radical cystectomy, not 26. These corrections do not alter any trends or conclusions from the article. [Formula presented] Figure 6: Quality of life outcomes. (A) Physical functioning or wellbeing. (B) Role functioning. (C) Global health status. (D) Emotional functioning or wellbeing. (E) Cognitive functioning. (F) Social functioning.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e98-e99 |
| Journal | European Urology |
| Volume | 84 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Oct 2023 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Urology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative, Oncological, and Quality of Life Outcomes Using Randomized Controlled Trials” [Eur Urol. 2023;84:393–405] (European Urology (2023) 84(4) (393–405), (S0302283823027264), (10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.004))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS