TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-Effectiveness and Economic Impact of Bladder Cancer Management
T2 - An Updated Review of the Literature
AU - Joyce, Daniel D.
AU - Sharma, Vidit
AU - Williams, Stephen B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Bladder cancer remains one of the costliest malignancies to manage. We provide a narrative review of literature assessing the economic burden and cost-effectiveness of bladder cancer treatment and surveillance. This is an update to a previous review and focuses on data published within the past 10 years. We queried PubMed and MEDLINE for all bladder cancer cost-related literature between 2013 and 2023. After initial screening, 117 abstracts were identified, 50 of which were selected for inclusion in our review. Management of disease recurrence and treatment complications contributes significantly to the high cost of care. High-value interventions are therefore treatments that improve recurrence-free and overall survival at minimal additional toxicity. De-escalation of surveillance and diagnostic interventions may help to reduce costs in this space without compromising oncologic control. The persistently rising cost of novel cancer drugs undermines their value when only modest gains in efficacy are observed. Multiple cost-effectiveness analyses have been published and are useful for contextualizing the cost, efficacy, and impact on quality of life that interventions have in this population. Further cost-effectiveness work is needed to better characterize the impact that treatment costs have on patients’ financial well-being and quality of life.
AB - Bladder cancer remains one of the costliest malignancies to manage. We provide a narrative review of literature assessing the economic burden and cost-effectiveness of bladder cancer treatment and surveillance. This is an update to a previous review and focuses on data published within the past 10 years. We queried PubMed and MEDLINE for all bladder cancer cost-related literature between 2013 and 2023. After initial screening, 117 abstracts were identified, 50 of which were selected for inclusion in our review. Management of disease recurrence and treatment complications contributes significantly to the high cost of care. High-value interventions are therefore treatments that improve recurrence-free and overall survival at minimal additional toxicity. De-escalation of surveillance and diagnostic interventions may help to reduce costs in this space without compromising oncologic control. The persistently rising cost of novel cancer drugs undermines their value when only modest gains in efficacy are observed. Multiple cost-effectiveness analyses have been published and are useful for contextualizing the cost, efficacy, and impact on quality of life that interventions have in this population. Further cost-effectiveness work is needed to better characterize the impact that treatment costs have on patients’ financial well-being and quality of life.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85153387485
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153387485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40273-023-01273-8
DO - 10.1007/s40273-023-01273-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37088844
AN - SCOPUS:85153387485
SN - 1170-7690
VL - 41
SP - 751
EP - 769
JO - PharmacoEconomics
JF - PharmacoEconomics
IS - 7
ER -