TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost Effectiveness of Additional Preoperative Telephone Call to Increase Surgical Preparedness
T2 - Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Halder, Gabriela E.
AU - Guo, Fangjian
AU - Harvie, Heidi
AU - White, Amanda B.
AU - Caldwell, Lauren
AU - Giles, Dobie L.
AU - Bilagi, Daksha
AU - Rogers, Rebecca G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, The International Urogynecological Association.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Introduction and Hypothesis: There is a need for cost effective interventions that increase surgical preparedness in urogynecology. Methods: We performed an ancillary prospective economic evaluation of the Telehealth Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness for Surgery (TIPPS) Trial, a randomized multicenter trial that evaluated the impact of a preoperative telehealth call on surgical preparedness in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. A within-trial analysis from the health care sector and societal perspective was performed. Cost-effectiveness was computed from health care sector and societal perspectives, with an 8-week time horizon. Results: A total of 126 women were included in our analysis. QALYs gained were similar between groups (telehealth 0.1414 + 0.0249; usual care 0.1409 + 0.0179). The cumulative mean per-person costs at 8 weeks from the healthcare sector perspective were telehealth call: $8696 +/– 3341; usual care: $8473 +/– 3118 (p = 0.693) and from the societal perspective were telehealth call: $11,195 + 5191; usual care: $11,213 +/– 4869 (p = 0.944). The preoperative telehealth call intervention was not cost effective from the health care sector perspective with an ICER of $460,091/QALY (95%CI –$7,382,608/QALY, $7,673,961) using the generally accepted maximum willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY (Neumann et al. N Engl J Med. 371(9):796–7, 2014). From the societal perspective, because incremental costs per QALY gained were negative $–35,925/QALY (95%CI, –$382,978/QALY, $317,226), results suggest that preoperative telehealth call dominated usual care. Conclusions: A preoperative telehealth call is cost effective from the society perspective. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered with http://ClinicalTrials.gov . Date of registration: March 26, 2019 Date of initial participant enrollment: June 5, 2019 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03890471 Clinical trial identification number: NCT03890471.
AB - Introduction and Hypothesis: There is a need for cost effective interventions that increase surgical preparedness in urogynecology. Methods: We performed an ancillary prospective economic evaluation of the Telehealth Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness for Surgery (TIPPS) Trial, a randomized multicenter trial that evaluated the impact of a preoperative telehealth call on surgical preparedness in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. A within-trial analysis from the health care sector and societal perspective was performed. Cost-effectiveness was computed from health care sector and societal perspectives, with an 8-week time horizon. Results: A total of 126 women were included in our analysis. QALYs gained were similar between groups (telehealth 0.1414 + 0.0249; usual care 0.1409 + 0.0179). The cumulative mean per-person costs at 8 weeks from the healthcare sector perspective were telehealth call: $8696 +/– 3341; usual care: $8473 +/– 3118 (p = 0.693) and from the societal perspective were telehealth call: $11,195 + 5191; usual care: $11,213 +/– 4869 (p = 0.944). The preoperative telehealth call intervention was not cost effective from the health care sector perspective with an ICER of $460,091/QALY (95%CI –$7,382,608/QALY, $7,673,961) using the generally accepted maximum willingness to pay threshold of $150,000/QALY (Neumann et al. N Engl J Med. 371(9):796–7, 2014). From the societal perspective, because incremental costs per QALY gained were negative $–35,925/QALY (95%CI, –$382,978/QALY, $317,226), results suggest that preoperative telehealth call dominated usual care. Conclusions: A preoperative telehealth call is cost effective from the society perspective. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered with http://ClinicalTrials.gov . Date of registration: March 26, 2019 Date of initial participant enrollment: June 5, 2019 URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03890471 Clinical trial identification number: NCT03890471.
KW - Incontinence
KW - Informed consent
KW - Prolapse
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181737330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181737330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00192-023-05719-7
DO - 10.1007/s00192-023-05719-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 38189853
AN - SCOPUS:85181737330
SN - 0937-3462
JO - International Urogynecology Journal
JF - International Urogynecology Journal
ER -