Cost-Effectiveness of Case Management and Financial Incentives to Increase Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation

Donald S. Shepard, Jiaye Shen, Blair K. Yant, Deborah E. Denkmann, Patrick D. Savage, Robin K. Collier, Brian R. Katz, Philip A. Ades, Diann E. Gaalema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: As cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is highly effective, cost-effective, and professionally recommended, policymakers seek to increase utilization. Here we applied results from a randomized trial of case management (CM) and financial incentives (FI), paid as retail gift cards, separately and combined. We modeled their impact and cost-effectiveness compared to usual care (UC) in increasing quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Methods: Staff time logs, FI payouts, and CR attendance records generated short-term data. We derived the lifetime QALYs and cost-effectiveness (in 2022 US dollars) from a 2024 cost-effectiveness study of CR calibrated from an observational cohort of 601 099 CR-eligible Medicare beneficiaries. That cohort study controlled for confounding using instrumental variables (IV) and propensity-based (PB) matching. Results: The FI alone and CM + FI combined interventions increased CR sessions significantly. Additional CR sessions per participant averaged 7.04 (95% CI, 0.93-13.15) with FI and 13.63 (95% CI, 7.86-19.41) with CM + FI. The CM alone intervention did not increase sessions significantly (mean = 1.53: 95% CI, −4.23 to 7.56). The CM + FI intervention generated the most lifetime QALYs, 0.733 (IV) and 1.100 (PB), and displayed a powerful synergy between CM and FI. Under CM + FI, the cost of financial payouts averaged $1088 (range $0-$1966), and total intervention costs averaged $2388. The lifetime cost-effectiveness of CM + FI was 29.966 (95% CI, 29.636-30.296, IV) or 29.257 (95% CI, 28.935-29.579 PB) QALYs/$million. Both values substantially surpassed the average threshold of the United States health care system (10.421 QALYs/$million). Conclusions: The CM + FI intervention proved highly effective and more than twice as cost-effective as the average of all health interventions in the United States. Thus, CM + FI, combined with other effective interventions such as automatic referral and home-based CR, merit widespread implementation and funding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • cardiac rehabilitation
  • case management
  • coronary heart disease
  • cost-effectiveness
  • incentives

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-Effectiveness of Case Management and Financial Incentives to Increase Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this